trpfl

Short and sweet: anyone notice how just in the last day or two, Wave has paywalled certain core features that were previously usable in the Free tier? Specifically, I can think of two main ones that I've been using consistently:

1. Direct Sending of Invoices - You must now create your own email, copy/paste the invoice link into it, and download/re-attached the PDF copy of the invoice.
2. Invoice Payment Reminders - Again, they've been fully usable and present since Wave's inception, but now are paywalled.

Anyone else notice anything that is core to your workflow, previously free, now paywalled?

Have used Wave since 2017 and it's been decent, but lack of a fully write-capable API had me pl

I have a customer with two specific users who are being blocked when trying to email any colleagues whose companies use ProofPoint Essentials. The error message returned to them is always as follows:

Message blocked.

Your message to [email protected] has been blocked. See technical details below for more information.

The response from the remote server was:

550 5.7.1 : Sender address rejected: User email address is marked as invalid.

We've tried asking each individual colleague org to have their IT teams whitelist the offending addresses, but that doesn't seem to be working. I've also tried submitting an official ProofPoint De-List, but no resul

I have a customer looking for a projector to use for PowerPoint presentations given to 10-20 person audiences in small to large conference rooms and cafeterias. The projector would likely be sitting on a table 10-15' from a typical-sized projector screen, hooked up via HDMI to new-ish Windows 11 laptop with plenty of graphics horsepower. I'd like the projected image to look as sharp as reasonably possible and plenty bright enough. I'd prefer to keep cost at or under $1500, but could go higher if absolutely necessary. What make/model projector would you suggest for this application. We're in the USA and are aware of the usual players (Epson, Optoma, Panasonic, BenQ, etc.). As a starting point

It would be great to have an option to hide the right-side "details" pane when viewing tasks. In such a mode, task details would only show when a task is clicked, via either 1) a "pop-over" above the task list itself, or 2) a slide-out details pane (similar to the current details pane, only dynamically showing/hiding as you click on/off of tasks).

TL;DR - This feature, or a similar variation, is offered by most of the top todo apps, including Todoist, Amazing Marvin, Things, etc. and IMHO is really a key component to UI/UX, to allow users to have a cleaner focus on a particular list or view (it would especially work well while executing a Pomodoro).

Thank you for listening!

Is Sophos ever planning on adding any form of smart queue management (SQM) to XG? I know UTM has fq_codel; either that or CAKE would be phenomenal. Thank you!

As the title says, thinking of "upgrading" from the On-Cell Touch FHD 250 nit (FRU 01LW092) to a Non-Touch IGZO FHD 400 nit low-power panel. Trading touch (which I almost never use) for image quality, brightness and better battery life seems like a no-brainer.

For the display itself, I'm thinking the N140HCG-GQ2 ($150 - eBay link), or equivalent (as long as it has the corner mounts compatible with the T480). Is that the current top choice, more or less? Is there higher nit brightness with equivalently low power draw?

For the display cable, I presume I'll need the 30-pin eD

Looking for a low-profile, lower-power (<70W) workstation-class graphics card for blueprint/construction, that can handle 4 displays, to go into a Lenovo ThinkCentre M725s SFF box (Ryzen 5 Pro 2400G). Displays will be two 1080p LCDs via DVI and one 4K TV via HDMI (for now).

The user is mostly viewing PDF blueprints on the 4K TV; very little content creation, so not much power needed there. Looking at the Radeon Pro WX 3200; also considering a Quadro P620 or P1000. Ideally would like a sub-$200 card.

Chief concern is stability and reliability. Would an AMD-based card on an AMD-based system be a better idea, versus Nvidia? Or better to go with a card that's been out longer with potent