(This is a response to a comment left by Grammarly support on another post, but I felt it warranted its own space.)  
  
Paragraph-level rewrites are clunky and inefficient by comparison to the Quick Fix and are second draft tools more useful for refining than just getting somethign readable on paper. when i am just writing somethign and forget a hypehen or misspell a word or two i don;t want to bother with a Paragraph-level rewrite to fix it and going back and fixing the issue one by one is annoying and time consuming by comparison.

Yes... I left every one of those mistakes in there intentionally to prove my point. All of that could have been fixed with a single button press, now... I'm not going to bother, just like I probably won't bother re-upping my subscription in December without this feature.  
  
This is above and beyond the improvement to my second-draft processing time; it quite literally quartered the number of suggestions I had to deal with, making second and final drafts a snap, again, by comparison.  
  
If you were going to give us these "task-specific agents" that are meant to integrate directly into our workflows and replace Quick Fix, you should have done that first and shown us how to use them in place of QF before removing a feature that was so stunningly useful.  
  
"Users' communication outcomes" be damned. The people complaining about this feature being removed are the writers, those who do this for a living, not the people writing e-mails who may only have one or two things underlined per document. Thanks for showing us that you don't give a damn about the people who most appreciate and depend on your service.

Bring Quick Fix back.