Why the judges' decisions Geneva 2023 finals are in fact completely fair

Competitions are controversial, because there are always implied biases, but this is one of those few instances where I think judges were 100% Objective and Correct, I'll explain why:

Geneva Finals: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mlJZm5JYc-E

If you actually do listen ot all the competitors play their concerto, you would know:

Yu Yuan: Stylistically very French, light tone and articulation, stylized phrasing, but I found him to be rather technically unpolished, including some slips in the Ibert, and overall his tempo seems unstable.

Elizaveta Ivanova: Very expressive playing in the Mozart, Nielsen is played very tastefully, its one of the few performances I know of that I don't have much to pick at.

Mario Bruno: Great sound, but his breathing in parts of the Ibert, namely the Third movement actually takes a big cut to his phrasing, Overall more technically reliable than Yu Yuan's performance, but still not with out its issues

I'm curious to see how everyone thinks