Is there any meaningful difference between destiny and hasan’s views on political violence rhetoric in their media space?

Destiny identifies specific political violence that is justifiable on his media space; ie DACA individuals home being threatened by the government or healthcare recipients loosing their coverage and being threatened with death by the government; and hasan

destiny justifying political violence (4:20)

https://youtu.be/DDMwioVH12U?feature=shared

whats does it mean that if someone see your political violence, and they think it’s justifiEd, then does this mean they think that your political violence is logical and/or reasonable and/or warranted? (IF) yes, would this mean they would support that political violence? And if that scenario where that political violence were to develop, would it be reasonable for them to advocate for political violence in that specific setting?