How this game handles Linebackers
Anyone else dislike the 3-4 vs 4-3 linebacker set up in this game?
First, they have guys like Phernell McPhee with 4-3 Chemistry wtf? And hightower who would be perfect in 4-3 with 3-4?
But even regardless of chemistry it seems like guys can either rush the passer or cover but not both. Is it because a pass rush guy than can cover is OP? Just seems to split, and like MOST linebackers in the game are built to run stop and blitz but passing to TEs and RBs is like 98% of everyones gameplan.
Thats not really reflective of real football no? 3-4 linebackers have to cover, almost every play 1 of them does.
Even in this game how do you guys that run 3-4 select your OLBs? DO you just not value zone and man coverage stats? Do you think speed + awr +prec really is all that matters?
Is also frustrating because the guys i get for 4-3 that can struggle in run support and pressure, and this game seems to think DTs are irrelevant.
Posted Sep 21, 2016, 2:10 PM UTC
Hightower is both a solid rusher and a good coverage guy, same guys for someone like Barr. Mack also has okay coverage stats, can easily guard flat zones.
Not sure why McPhee has 4-3 chem, can only imagine it's stupidity/the need to have a 4-3 chem elite LB.
I get hybrid guys to play in my 3-4. Right now I'm running with Hightower at ROLB and been cycling through Barr, Mack and Von at LOLB. The LOLBs do a solid enough job of covering the zones I assign them to but I rarely use them in man and if I do I avoid them on potential out routes and have a user over the middle
Ive only been able to use Hightower in DC and dude was a beast usering picks. I would be way off my man and hed still jump in and grab it. It was awesome.
[deleted]
nah
Yeah books are awesome. Have you read "The Beast" yet? It's well worth your time.