Historical Performance of Real Estate Empire vs. Stocks
I'm doing some long-term planning, and was hoping to bounce a few ideas off of people.
I've been wondering what the historical performance of a small real estate empire has been as opposed to investing the downpayment in the stock market. At the moment, I have a single rental property that is doing well for me. However, I'm not sure whether I want to continue building this until I have a real estate empire, or invest aggressively in stocks.
Obviously, managing real estate takes more time and effort, but I'm able to manage the one property while working and going to school, so I should be OK. I can always get a property manager down the line when I need one. Either way, I'm living frugally and saving like crazy. I'm getting close to having a down payment saved up, so I wanted to see if anyone had any data.
Lastly, if it makes any difference, I'm considering, but by no means committed to FI/RE in 13~15 years. There are many things which can throw that plan out the window: loving my career (a definite possibility, I'm trying get into a very interesting field), financial pitfalls (possible, but hopefully I can avoid the ones that I can control).
Posted Oct 5, 2016, 7:17 PM UTC
This question, historically, has been discouraged here in r/pf - with the reasoning usually indicating issues with the performance of this strategy compared to the stock market as well as the effort required. I would recommend asking this over in r/realestate, or even on the biggerpockets.com forum.
For what it's worth as an anecdote - I'm someone who has 3 multifamily properties, with a 19% year over year return cash money, and a 43% yearly return if accounting for equity gains (not even adding in any appreciation). I spend about 300 hours a year on these properties, averaging 5.7 hours a week.