Snark From Anonymous SF Moderators, or, When We Don't Let the Votes Decide
Disclaimer: You may or may not agree this link belongs on r/sanfrancisco, but I'm more interested in just putting another example out there of the behavior of the mods on this sub.
I posted this link, which I found on a Facebook page for a San Francisco neighborhood coalition, because I felt it was relevant to problems we face in San Francisco, and that page did, too: https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2017/8/18/16162234/regional-inequality-cause (I posted it with an unedited title)
This was the ensuing response, yet again from an anonymous account instead of an identified account:
Nothing but snark. This is how the people who are supposed to be stewards of this subreddit and ambassadors for local culture treat the denizens of this sub. Perhaps there was a political motivation.
I'll also be posting this to r/sanfranciscoII in case it gets deleted from here.
Posted Aug 22, 2017, 6:29 PM UTC
And an explanation for why your post was removed...
In unnecessarily rude terms, and then I was muted from messaging the mods when I was not being abusive towards them. Serious question: Is that how you want your mods to behave?
It's not like they're paid. They told you why the post was removed and you kept arguing. I'm fine with them muting you and moving on if you don't accept their initial response.