Using "non-" prefix correctly

Hey guys. A bit of an obscure one here.

The sentence in question is:

"The introduction of a [non- water equivalent] material into the system causes..."

I'm not sure exactly how to phrase the bracketed section. Options:

  • water nonequivalent

  • non- water equivalent

  • non-water equivalent

  • something else?

The context is scientific / technical writing (academic journal)

Posted Oct 27, 2017, 1:02 PM UTC

11
Boo155•

Could you provide a bit more context? Does the substance have to be a liquid? If so, maybe "liquid other than water"?

1