r/IAmA•
32bites

IAmA Survey

Upvote the comments you agree with. (I will only count upmods.) So if you downvote an option you don't agree with it will have no effect.

I will get the count at Fri, 04 Dec 2009 23:59:59 -0800 (PST).

Verification: Stop, Continuing (how...)

Requests: Only in comment list (with sub options), Only as submissions, None at all, Stay the same

Other comments (please only comment under this post.)

Please do not downvote comments you disagree with, once they get -10 points they are hidden from other people who may vote for it.

Posted Dec 3, 2009, 11:16 AM UTC · edited

3375
32bitesOP•

Verification:

193
32bitesOP•

Continuing verifying - (how...)

275
32bitesOP•

Verification should be for anonymous posters that wish to be considered legit. Verification will only be given if proof is exclusive to moderators.

edit: it has been pointed out to me that this is phrased a bit cryptically, how I see it this option has taken the place of Verify anyone who can provide proof.

457
[deleted]•

[deleted]

2
desk_rabbit•

post in the comments section :)

1
32bitesOP•

Verification should be for influential, famous and celebrity status posts Only.

75
32bitesOP•

Stop verifying altogether.

-65
32bitesOP•

Requests:

91
32bitesOP•

Requests should stay the same as they are now.

289
32bitesOP•

Requests should be made exclusively in the current request list comments.

41
32bitesOP•

The green text for submitted requests should not be removed.

242
32bitesOP•

Submission requests that are made should be removed.

83
32bitesOP•

Submission requests that are made should not be removed.

33
32bitesOP•

The green text for submitted requests should be removed.

-20
32bitesOP•

Requests should be made exclusively as submissions, and there should be no request list.

15
32bitesOP•

Requests should not be made at all.

-23
32bitesOP•

Other comments:

Leave any comments you have here.

8
Bornhuetter•

Overall this subreddit is running pretty well. Thanks for all the hard work.

107
len69•

^this

-27
[deleted]•

What's it like being a survey? Why is no one asking you questions? Am I misunderstanding this topic?

75
32bitesOP•

What's it like being a survey?

I must admit i have next to no experience myself being a survey but I think I can learn quick.

Am I misunderstanding this topic?

I think you might be doing exactly that.

36
[deleted]•

Seriously though, ama is fantastic. You've done a fine job.

13
rubberball•

LOL I thought you were some sort of manual survey service.

-1
dearsomethingMOD•

To everyone reading this: regarding the requests and aggregating them - it's hard to pull them from 3 different places (comments, submissions, spam). There has definitely been an increase in requests in the past few weeks.

Would people be OK with me removing redundant submission requests, e.g. ones that are in the list and/or have been requested a lot before and/or ones that are already Reddit Interviews?

21
Chetyre•

I don't see anything wrong with this. Maybe just PM the submitter/poster "hey, this has been requested before so I'm going to keep the front page tidy".

4
peanutsfan1995•

I gotta say, I like that idea. It makes sense.

1
Jameslikesme•

I think more could be done about the huge amount of people making insulting comments about IAmA posters. Such comments often get many upvotes simply because other Redditors agree that the IAmA poster has these negative qualities. However, these comments detract from the genuinely useful info that can be gleaned from people actually asking the IAmA poster questions - the whole point of the subreddit.

I mean, I can think to myself 'Man, that IAma person sounds horrible, I hope I never meet anyone like that', but I realise that writing such a comment in their thread helps noone, and it discourages other people from making their own IAma threads.

Although the subreddit description says "mindless insults are subject to moderation" - I've definitely seen mindless insults garner many upvotes without being moderated (of course that's not to say that no comments are moderated, I'm simply surprised at the amount of comments I've seen that aren't moderated).

16
krappy•

You can't moderate what people think, agree with, disagree with, upvote, or downvote. In the end this reddit is run by the community.

10
[deleted]•

[deleted]

5
AbsoluteTruth•

Good/bad is different from being a disrespectful dick.

2
JoshFiles2•

For the requests option I am happy with how it is running at the moment, with both submissions and the request list, I didn't see an option for that so I didn't upvote anything.

Edit: Also, I don't see why verification needs to be exclusive to moderators either. If a person posts verification in their original post, like a 6 fingered person holding a Reddit sign, why couldn't that count?

9
32bitesOP•
6
JoshFiles2•

Thanks for that. Encase you only check for orangered envelope I also changed edited my post to say "Edit: Also, I don't see why verification needs to be exclusive to moderators either. If a person posts verification in their original post, like a 6 fingered person holding a Reddit sign, why couldn't that count?"

2
32bitesOP•

They can feel more than welcome to. But the question more pertain to giving out gold stars.

ignore the grammar, myself and desk_rabbit are a bit intoxicated

3
unloud•

You aren't a very extensive survey.

6
32bitesOP•

If you feel any questions are not being asked that should be, tell me and I will be willing to add them if I feel they add a decent amount of value to the survey.

6
unloud•

Oh, it wasn't a criticism of content... It's just that my perception of surveys is generally something with 20 questions or more.

My opinion of IAmA is that the only thing I'd like to see is no more scammers, but it looks like you all are taking care of that ;-)

3
32bitesOP•

Yes, I am not aware what moderator gave the gold star to the post I think you are talking about. However between moderators I know I can trust we have been discussing the issue.

1
[deleted]•

[deleted]

1
Nick4753•

Would help if there was some way to verify/trust the mods and have some sort of secure way to provide documentation without it being logged. Don't have any ideas, just saying that as somebody who sent some stuff to MMM I'm still hesitant to post any more IAmAs or tell others to. Some more details about how you intend on keeping things private would be nice.

And REQUIRING verification is idiotic (aka the McDonalds guy, which I know you guys already addressed internally) but it does help

5
32bitesOP•

And REQUIRING verification is idiotic (aka the McDonalds guy, which I know you guys already addressed internally) but it does help

On that issue mmm acted unilaterally.

We only really require verification when it is a notable public figure or celebrity.

9
Yserbius•

Make a standard verification technique and put it on the front page.

Example: "If you would like a gold verification star, please PM 32bites or dearsomething with a picture of yourself showing yourself doing your thing and another with you holding a hello reddit sign".

4
slkjfdhsd•

make sure to include a reference to the30thElement!

3
jamt9000•

How about using this to toggle request visibility? (Look in the sidebar)

4
Chetyre•

Ooooh, I like that. It'd be great if we could get a feature like that.

1
Orphe•

I'm confused. What is the point of this?

3
32bitesOP•

We have received mixed messages from the IAmA community and would like to know what the majority of people think.

6
Chetyre•

You can please some of the people all of the time and all of the people some of the time but you can't please all of the people all of the time.

1
P33KAJ3W•

Survey, will you bring back MMM?

3
dearsomething•

Why do you ask?

1
zemsta•

The thing about this survey is that it will be biased no matter what you do. In statistics, it's called a response bias. A response bias is when you wait for the answers to come to you, instead of completely randomizing the process.

(I have a stats final in 5 days)

3
32bitesOP•

Okay, tell me on reddit what would be a better way to do this.

2
zemsta•

do you have access to every subscriber to IAmA? you could send out random orangered envelopes and tabulate the answers that way. Plus, with the way hive mind works, you're bound to get pretty messed up results.

(I realize this is non scientific, i just felt like I had to bring it up. it helps with studying too :) )

1
32bitesOP•

do you have access to every subscriber to IAmA?

No I do not have access to the list.

The best I could to is message people who are leaving comments but that would only be polling people who comment.

1
Clbull•

I agree that IAmA Requests shouldn't be exclusive to the verified list.

They're already distinguished from responses through the green text. Plus there seems to be a lack of clarification of what we actually need to do with IAmA Requests.

Why are certain people posting on every request and asking for the request to be made in the official Request List when we already have the green text distinguishing them?

As a suggestion for this subreddit. I think we should keep the current system as it is (green text for requests, blue for responses), but keep the Request List as a list of popular and notable IAmA Request posts, so they don't become unnoticeable after a day. Since a lot of people read the frontpage of IAmA, this will not only keep the initial exposure of IAmA Requests, but give the option to post in the permanent request list.

1
iPood•

Verification will only be given if proof is exclusive to moderators.

Am I missing something? If they make their proof public (like the creator of Omegle did), they won't be given verification?

Also, I love this subreddit, thanks for having this survey!

1
PSteak•

Verification is stupid and marginalizes the posts that don't have gold stars. While I can imagine some people out there even pretending to be something unglamorous for whatever reasons, the text should make it apparent most of the time whether they have legitimacy or not, and they can seek out mods if they want to provide proof within the posting. Celebrities or other specific people should provide provide proof to mods, but solely as a way to keep the posting from being deleted.

1
[deleted]•

[deleted]

0
32bitesOP•

What browser are you using on what screen size?

2
[deleted]•

[deleted]

2
cantCme•

Have you seen the TF2 logo? I think it is wider.

2
Notmyrealname•

Upvoted.

0
Failcake•

Can you PLEASE make a rule against requesting specific people?

0
Failcake•

Can you PLEASE make a rule against requesting specific people?

0
Failcake•

Can you PLEASE make a rule against requesting specific people?

0
[deleted]•

How can you tell up vs down votes on comments? Is that visible to moderators but not regular users?

3
32bitesOP•

Everyone can see them, if you add .json to the end of the url and that file will have the data for what you see.

But there are also greasemonkey scripts that do this. I am using Reddit Uppers and Downers.

Here is a sample of how it looks.

3
zomgwtfbbq•

The best part of that screenshot is that, despite your very simple instructions, people are still downvoting stuff. This is why designing any sort of system is depressing sometimes - people are ignorant and are unwilling to take even one second to educate themselves.

5
[deleted]•

Cool, thanks.

1
[deleted]•

[deleted]

2
slkjfdhsd•

its in the source code. there is an monkey app for your firefox

1
[deleted]•

[deleted]

1
32bitesOP•

Yes I agree with you, however I think we would need more than two.

But as for mods I trust for sure, I have known desk_rabbit since junior high, Saydrah is extremly nice and verry trustworthy, qgyh2 is qgyh2, and that karmanaut, there's a frood who really knows where his towel is.

9
AbsoluteTruth•

I think the amount of mods is fine. In fact, I wouldn't mind seeing 1-2 more.

5
merpes•

What was the recent scammer?

1
Chetyre•

See this though there were a lot of threads on the subject.

1
corevette•

So what's it like to not have a soul?

-1
noobjob•

Hi Survey.

-3
prob_not_sol•

... what is going on here?

-19