Drysuit exhaust valve profiles
I've been trying to figure out if there are any substantial differences between high profile and low profile drysuit exhaust valve. I understand that the lower profile ones are marginally less likely to get caught on stuff or knocked around, but are there any downsides as compared to their high profile counterparts? Basically, I just want to better understand the pros and cons. Not trying to ignite an Apeks vs SiTech debate, I swear!
Posted Jan 27, 2019, 6:21 PM UTC
The nominal flow rates through the newer low profile valves are significantly higher than high profile valves, but some people insist the high profile valves are easier to vent. I don't know if it's some factor outside of flow rate, like maybe the high profile valves are just easier to trigger even though they dump more slowly, or maybe people are just imagining it. On paper, though, low profile valves should perform better across the board and I've never had any issues with them. I find the cut of the suit makes a far more noticeable difference—some drysuits I just cannot get to dump quickly no matter how I position myself—as does the valve being positioned properly on the shoulder.
So, if I'm understanding correctly, there's no real valid reason not to go with a low profile exhaust valve these days, and the debate now is more about SiTech vs Apeks or single vs double checked (I.e. Viking Hazmat).
That's my assessment of the situation, yes. But I've only ever significantly used the low profile valves myself, outside of a few short term rentals with high profiles, and one of the people I know who really prefers the high profile ones is someone in the drysuit repair business who knows more about drysuits then I ever will. So it's possible there's some secret sauce I just don't get. However, for my own experience, I've been perfectly happy with low profiles and, like I said, there isn't a non-magical explanation I've been able to find for why high profile valves should perform better in any way.