Television advertising and stereotypes
I wanted to have a chat about this topic, where we stop focusing just on how they objectify, and belittle women, but also how they make men look like simple assholes who don't care about their relationships.
Recently, it's been the PS3 commercials. There's several other advertisements that might make more fun of one sex, but in the end, they're all based on stereotypes.
I think this is because it's suppose to be humorous. While I agree it's wrong to depict women as whiny and upset because her boyfriend isn't paying attention to her, the fact of the matter is that the commercial is also saying her boyfriend is too big of a dick to give her any attention, because he'd rather play a video game. This is enough to make both sexes angry.
So I'm curious why there's always so much more focus on how women are being objectified and made to look silly, and why we seldom make comments about how men are portrayed in these ads. Do we really feel that these are accurate depictions of men? Or are we just too caught up in the female problems to see the bigger picture?
I know feminism is a focus on women, and female-related topics, I think keeping things in perspective is helpful, and I'm really curious why often, no other sides are taken into account when discussing topics, especially TV advertising.
Posted Mar 30, 2010, 12:37 AM UTC
Honestly it seems like we do talk about this often.
A lot of feminists talk about the dualism of how men and women are portrayed in the media and that one set of stereotypes necessarily feeds the other because gender roles tend to be polarising (women are weak, men must therefore be strong, etc etc) and a lot of attention has been paid to the way men are advertised to as well. For a rather comedic take on the matter I highly recommend Sarah Haskins' Target: Women episode on the "doofy husband" trope.
Part of this trope, however, is something that inexorably works its way back to misogyny. If men are supposedly so incompetent that they can't operate a blender or change a diaper... guess who has to be the expert? :P Generally, stereotypes about women blow back onto men, and vice versa. They're necessarily connected and stem from similar social ideas about the roles of men and women.
The difference today- as opposed to 40 years ago- is that this is being balanced with the drive to portray women "positively", so now the domestic goddess also has a job and an SUV. But this is simply metamorphosing into all sorts of silliness that is sexist against men and women, which both sexes tend to see as unrealistic in either case.
The media messages aimed at men have always been of significant concern to many feminists who do media criticism; at least the ones I know and read, or whose lectures I've heard, and I can certainly speak for myself in this regard. Objectifying imagery of men portrays a masculine ideal that has, without question, played a role in rising rates of male anorexia, perpetuates bullying in schools against young boys, and promotes violence as the inherently "male" solution to problems.
I don't need to illustrate how that's problematic for women as well.
So, the criticisms are out there for sure. They're two sides of the same coin, misogynist and misandrist media portrayals. One necessarily reinforces the other. They have to.
Edit: Clarified a few sentences. :)
Thanks for gracing my topic with your awesome insight.
Also, thanks for the link. I love her "target women" series.
I agree with most of your post but I think the above is pretty whack. Why is it misogynistic to portray women as more competent or capable than men?
Because they're usually only portrayed as more capable of housework/childrearing/etc.
But then how can you win? If you portray them as doing housework, it's misogyny, but if you portray them as being competent at anything else, it's also misogyny? Am I missing something here?
There's a difference in being portrayed as competent in something vs. being better at it than a man because it's a woman.