Source
TheCoinEvolution•

Even if someone was able to decipher it, I feel like it would contain information already known to science by now.

5
jdamager•

I think it’s a hoax. It’s gibberish.

1
pint•

it would still be interesting to learn who did it, and maybe how

6
jdamager•

I agree. Maybe it’s something. I’m not code breaker lol, I’d for sure like to know what the truth is.

2
grixelle•

It’s statistically flat so it’s likely a decorative work. Sometimes people do things like this with no concrete purpose in mind other than to be creative. Thus it’s a very human endeavor.

2
grixelle•

Statistically yes it’s gibberish. The index of coincidence shows it not to be a language (coded or not). The digraph, trigraph, tetragraph distribution is flat. It appears to be purely decorative (not uncommon). It’s a fantastical work of fiction. The Bristol researcher’s work is likely intentionally satirical.

2