BC2 vs MW2
I don't know how many of you guys have played MW2 but there seems to be quite a bit of prejudice here against MW2. I have played quite a bit of Battlefield myself (level 40 up in this) and recently decided to give MW2 a spin and see if it met my expectations.
So here, for your edification, are my observations of the differences between the two games:
##Multiplayer Obviously you buy either MW2 or BC2 for the multiplayer. I've got a singleplayer section for completeness further down.
MW2 wins
- Multiplayer feels very smooth in MW2, your ping will affect your performance a lot but you don't get the same kind of jerky feeling as in BC2 when you zoom in/out swap weapon etc... very nice and smooth all over.
- There is a metric fuck-tonne of unlocks and shit in MW2, way more than BC2. The challenges in MW2 are more interesting too!
- Way more game modes than BC2
- Usually you don't have to wait for an agonizing 15 seconds to spawn, you spawn quicker than in BC2.
- Fancy stuff like IR scopes, stun nades, sentries, HB sensors.
- Throwing knives what the shit.
- Prone
- Superior killcam
- Not as much BLOOM FUCKING EVERYWHERE as in BC2
- The maps have LOADS of cover (this is a question of preference though, sometimes it's nicer with big open maps like in BC2)
- Dual wield handguns holy shat
- If you reload while zoomed in, you zoom in automatically after reloading
BC2 wins
- Destruction: this is really the best thing about BC2 although it often works out to be laggy and rage inducing (building collapses onto you while you're jumping out of it what the shit)
- Squads are the shit
- Selectable spawn locations (okay MW2 has tactical insertion, but that's inferior to squad spawnage)
- Tanks and helicopters: although I feel that BC2 is slacking on the vehicle department when compared to BF2, having tanks and helis is nice.
- Bullet drop: this is really only noticable when sniping so this is pretty much a draw.
##Singleplayer Honestly BC2 wins this one easily but who the hell plays singleplayer in either of these games.
MW2 wins
- The plot sucks less ass. Seriously, what the shit is the plot of BC2? BALLS is what it is.
BC2 wins
- Vehicles, destruction and larger maps.
##Final Thoughts MW2 is pretty good in multiplayer. I don't see what all the hating is about. It was way better than expected.
Although MW2 does lack a few things which BC2 has, MW2 has got a lot of shit that BC2 doesn't.
Sure BC2 has dedicated servers, but the server browser was crippled for a long time before DICE got their ass off their heads and fixed that shit. MW2 was working fine since release.
Posted Aug 18, 2010, 12:42 PM UTC · edited
I think in terms of pure numbers that people prefer mw2 to bc2. I like how movement through the maps in bc2 is not just one of 2-3 paths determined by the developers. I can flank from weird angles and not have to worry about some guy with scavenger or oma just lobbing 203s around the corner where enemies always come from.
[deleted]