Christians and Jews were "dhimmi" in the Ottoman Empire and protected citizens, but would missionary works have been allowed?
I'm specifically curious about during the height of the Ottoman Empire during the reign of Suleiman the Magnificent in 1520-1566. The Byzantine Empire fell when Constantinople was defeated in 1453; as the years passed, would Christian groups from Europe (either Catholic or Orthodox) have attempted to send any priests, missionaries, or monastic orders such as Franciscans or Jesuits to the Ottoman Empire? Would this have even been allowed? I know that Christians and Jews were given protected status, but were still considered inferior to Muslim citizens.
During this time (1531-32) was also when the Church of England broke away from the Catholic church and that in 1571 is when Pope Pius V completes the formation of the Holy League against the Ottoman Empire. I believe that during this time priests were traveling as far as the Americas, China/Japan, and India; would they have ignored the Ottoman controlled lands or not been allowed in?
Thanks!
Posted Mar 9, 2020, 4:06 PM UTC
The first work I consulted had very little if any information about missionary work in the early Ottoman Empire. I think the following quote, which relates to earlier Muslim expansion than Suleiman but is still relevant.
Though they were protected, a Christian, even an educated one could only rise so high in the administrative ranks without converting to Islam. There was also devsirme, which was the practice of educating Christian boys in converting them to Islam and bringing them up to be fit for the Jannisar Corps or the Civil service. Muslims did not kill the Christians or force conversions because they still needed people to work, but they could take away the power of the best and brightest of the next generation and take away the ability for the advancement of Christian ideas past a certain level.
I did find some information of interest in a book that focused mostly on the relationship of the Ottoman Empire with Catholic (Western) Christians in the lands under their rule. There was already an Eastern/Western split in the church which was both theological and political. In addition, some Eastern Christians were considered heretical by both the Orthodox and the Latin (western Christians so there was a further lack of unity. The Ottomans treated the branches differently as well.
The Catholic or Western Christian areas that came under Ottoman rule had to make other arrangments for their freedoms which would make any missionary work likely precarious. So the Eastern Orthodox Church was depleted for various reasons and the enclaves of Western Christianity were in a precarious state. That leaves as you mention Christians from the West (Europe). However, the Church and political powers in the west were also distracted. As Frazee puts it,
Neill concludes that there undoubtedly was a Christian effect on Muslims, particularly Muslim mystics, but I am not qualified to comment or elaborate on that sorry! There was not however Christian conversion that one might expect from missionaries sent for that purpose. As for why there were missionaries to other relatively closed societies but not here research leads me to believe it is because there already were "established" churches even if they were greatly diminished in influence and numbers. The goal of driving out Islam militarily was still on people's minds rather than driving it out through conversion.
That said I did find one account of missionaries that went to Istanbul. Reproduced here since it seems to be what interested you the most.
Thanks for the interesting question! I enjoyed the research.
Sources:
Neill, Steven A History of Christian Missions, Second Edition Penguin New York 1986.
Frazee, Charles The Church and The Ottoman Empire 1453-1923 Cambridge University Press: NY 1983.
Edited to remove a statement that was not well supported. And to add clarity.
Thank you for the reply! That's very interesting; if I understand your statement correctly, you're saying these sources go into a few different factors:
Have I understood you correctly? Very enlightening, thank you! It seems as if any existing communities kept to themselves, they would have been left mostly to their own devices.
This may be a harder question for follow-up, but do you know of or can direct me towards any Catholic or Orthodox communities (whether clerical or citizenry) that existed in Egypt at this time? I imagine that there must have been some Orthodox leftovers from Greek influence, but perhaps I'm mistaken. This is all research for a book I'm working on. Thank you for your help!
I'm sorry this reply has taken so long. You sum up my post quite nicely. I did not find anything in-depth about communities in Eygpt at the time. Frazee's book leads me to believe there were Franciscans who were at odds with the Coptic church, which was the primary Christian sect in Eygpt at the time. It may be worth looking into or posting another follow-up.
That's quite alright, thank you so much for your help already, I really appreciate it. I'll poke around with researching Coptics at the time!