You want a real conspiracy? Why does criticism of the 9/11 Directed Energy Weapons theory barely exist?
Posted Sep 8, 2020, 3:12 AM UTC
2745
All sorts of conspiracies are constantly theorised and debunked every single day. Look at flat earth for example: the debunkers get funnier the more ridiculous the flat earthers theories get.
And yet Judy Wood seems to just dissolve into smoke.
WHERE DID THE TOWERS GO?
3
A lot of this stuff is pushed by trolls and LARPers and good old hucksters making a buck.
I think it's gaining a lot of attention because it's new and 6 corporations don't control the content of the creativity, so it's more appealing.
2
It's not new though. Judy Woods main presentation available is from 2012 and the book had already been published. There are no systematic debunking videos for her work of the kind you find against flat earthers.
2
Actually flat earth can proven by anyone using simple tools and methods, its curvature that can't be proven without images and films provided by nasa.
0
Awesome!
Can you link to any vids or blogs of the simple tools and methods?
2
They're all over YouTube. It's not difficult to search there. You can start with the channel Jeranism if they didn't scrub it. And for the record, when I started researching flat earth I was a glober like the rest of the world has been taught to be. I wanted to see what the fuss was about. The key is going into any form of research with an open mind and the ability to think critically. The proof is out there.
1
Nope. If it's simple and easy then it's simple and easy to link something for me to examine.
2
Judy Wood is very hard to find info on and her youtube channel was deleted . Her theory is the most plausible imo . Check out Hutchinson effect. He's been doing some interesting things for a long time . I saw him on public television back in the 90s.
3
It's like she has been shadowbanned from the world?
3
[removed]
1
Same reasons any serious work or research into abductions barely exists, it's to close to the truth. I think its dr Judy woods book Where did the towers go. HAMMER ON THE FUCKING NAIL. You look at all the missing material and all of the super fucking weird shit they were doing at ground zero. Exotic weapons were used, torsion field weapons, dustification. But here's the thing, the towers were supposed to fall and the people that used the DEW to bring them down were not the same people that were planning and executing the the false flag operation.
3
[removed]
1
9/11 wasn't energy weapons...?
Drones with pre planted explosives/thermite.
2
Can you find any good debunking videos on Judy Woods work? It's weird that there's tons of other 9/11 stuff but almost nothing about this.
3
One of the best reports, Wood avoids any partisan political hinting or statements and sticks strictly to her explanation of, where the buildings went.
2
Where did the buildings go? How has that question not even occured to me in the past 19 years?
1
Haven't watched yet, but it's fairly well known Tesla had a device for amplifying the resonant frequencies of objects using an oscillator and some sort of mechanical "tap" to said object at just the right frequency. Here's a pretty decent write up on it: https://teslaresearch.jimdofree.com/oscilators/mechanical-oscilator/
2
Thanks! Yeah it's strange for how relevant Teslas work is to these theories, he is well known and this theory is not.
1
When Judy Wood appeared with her book, it was generally considered to be disinformation by a community of 'researchers' who had long since grown tired of the many fringe 9/11 theories in circulation.
Despite this, her online prominence grew rapidly - and as you point out - not long after, she seemed to disappear from the spotlight just as quickly as she had arrived.
Make of that what you will.
2
###[Meta] Sticky Comment
Rule 2 does not apply when replying to this stickied comment.
Rule 2 does apply throughout the rest of this thread.
What this means: Please keep any "meta" discussion directed at specific users, mods, or r/conspiracy in general in this comment chain only.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
1
I met some people on Facebook who all 100% believed the directed energy theory as if it were complete fact. That was pretty disheartening for me considering here we are almost 20 years later, and people still can't agree about what happened. Had an email chain where people wanted to argue about what happened to Flight 93 in Shanksville. Uhhh... There was no plane whatsoever, just a smoldering bomb crater. Yet they still want to argue about whether it was shot down or not. Guys, it was neither because THERE WAS NO PLANE IN SHANKSVILLE.
WTC1 and WTC2 both had drone planes flown into them, and then the nanothermite was detonated to implode the buildings. The Pentagon and Shanksville did not have any actual planes, just bombs/missiles with a few pieces of debris thrown in after the fact.
1
But where did the towers go?
1
Blown outwards over several square miles, and straight down into their own footprint. Then all the debris was rushed out to China in order to avoid being properly investigated. The buildings were totally pulverized by nano thermite. All that remained were all the steel columns, which shot out all over the place.
1
How do you account for the amount of debris already missing before wtc7 had collapsed? The amount of debris there already doesn't even fill the tower lobbies.
1
Pretty sure my answer already accounted for that. All the concrete was pulverized and turned into dust, which coated the entire city. The beams were either melted down, shot out, or fell into the foot print. That picture is deceptive because the debris field is literally several square miles.
Edit there was also a basement which completely filled with debris, which you can't see in that pic. Again, deceptive.
0†
Because we know that directed energy weapons were not used for a fact. In some footage of WTC 1 and 2 you can see the thermate pouring out of the side of the building.
-2
We don't know anything about that day for a fact at this stage.
How do you account for the unusually weak seismic readings at the time of the business collapse?
Isn't it weird that if you try and Google a response to that question, there's virtually no discussion?
2
I would guess hundreds of bombs going off at once would cause seismic activity. But who really cares anyway? Let a grand jury figure that stuff out. The only thing that really matters is that our government perpetrated the event. No planes and DE weapons are just diversionary in my opinion.
1
You're missing it! It's not that there is too much seismic activity, there's not enough
Compare the Seismic measurements of the controlled demolition of the Seattle Kingdome: 2.3 to the WTC: 2.1 and 2.3.
Even though the WTC is several times bigger (estimated expected seismic measurement: 3.8)
2
That they used Thermite for certain things doesn't dismiss extra methods.
0
[deleted]
And yet of all the 9/11 conspiracies plausible or not, from jet fuel to explosives to holograms and mass delusions are littered across the internet, both by their believers and critics: this one angle, with some seemingly compelling evidence, is almost entirely absent.
While the directed energy weapon theory could be valid. The nanothermite theory actually has scientific backing and physical evidence. And you can also add the Dancing Israelis who got caught by the Police and the FBI carrying explosive materials.
I don't trust the DEWT one bit though. It seems to me like it is misdirection, to distract from the Israelis and nanothermite. Counter intel likes to throw crazy details into the sphere, to distract from more established and correct theories. I know Obama's Cass Sunstein, wrote a paper on doing just that.
https://youtu.be/nDnzPkuJiX0
I just don't know how the thermite accounts for the complete lack of debris at ground Zero even before wtc7 fell?
There was debris. They began to lift it right away, for like 4 days straight. They then sold it to China and to other groups.
A lot of people got cancer and other health issues from doing that as they were not given the proper equipment.
https://www.nydailynews.com/opinion/9-11-victims-not-left-fresh-kills-dump-families-article-1.307359
https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/ct-xpm-2002-01-27-0201270268-story.html
I believe mini nukes were involved, besides conventional explosives and thermate (weaponized thermite). There are photos of melted then resolidified bedrock in the footprints of the towers. Trace elements found go beyond what thermite would leave, but are common to nuclear devices. Lots of responders and workers dying of bizarre rare cancers, and the memorial is a flowing water based system, water being one of the best insulators against radiation. Not to mention the cores were literally vaporized and produced a chimney effect upwards, then when the outer structures collapsed they produced hot rolling pyroclastic flows. All of that combined points to mini nukes and not some unknown unexplainable directed energy weapon - imho.
You should check out Judy Woods 2012 presentation in full.
https://youtu.be/Uw-aZsXnGl0
I watched the first 15 minutes and it changed everything Is thought I knew. And it's weird, for all the in-depth debunking of the official story and the in-depth analysis of theories like yours, there is virtually nothing about this theory. Especially not debunking videos.
Im pretty sure I've seen it. I started researching everything about 9/11 in 2005 thru 2012. Thanks for the link tho. I'll double-check if I saw it already.