Is this car cheap because of water damage?
Earlier today I looked at a 2012 RAM 1500. It has 80k miles on it and is being sold for $17k, which is about the same price as other trucks with 130k+ miles on them in the area. There is a decent amount of cosmetic damage, which is fine by me. The car history had nothing on it and was bought at an auction.
I noticed a few red flags though:
-
The roof liner is almost definitely new, the floor looks new and is a water-proof plasticy material
-
They forgot to clean the DC outlet, and there was a thin layer of dirt on the inside of the cover and in the outlet that looked a lot like dried muddy water
-
The engine and other major components looked well-cleaned...Many of the tubes and conduits in the engine compartment had the normal layer of dirt you'd expect, but you could see water-runoff-ish lines in the dirt
-
The frame didn't look rusted, but the exhaust pipe and driveshaft had a layer of orange on them. Is that alarming?
It's a truck and I don't mind it having gotten dirty in the past, but is it possible this vehicle was submerged (or something like that) and does that even matter? Are weird dirt patterns a red flag? Was this truck maybe just used for mudding, and if so is that a red flag?
EDIT The car is being sold in Washington state
Posted Mar 28, 2021, 1:12 AM UTC · edited
That sum'bitch has been under water. Look at the Carfax history - has it spent time in any region that suffered major flooding in its lifetime? Was it from Texas?
Remember flood water contains salt, dirt, silt, bacteria, feces, raw sewage, rotten fish, etc. You won't know the extent of the contamination and mold throughout the vehicle and haven't begun to experience the electrical gremlins that are going to plague that truck for the rest of its life.
It's from Washington - I don't think they have much flooding here, but maybe it was moved?
[deleted]