Trios solo is harder than duos
Posted Aug 2, 2021, 4:18 PM UTC
67
Yeah, I hate it. Duos made sense but there’s literally no need for trios with a permanent mode for teams of 4. Not to mention, out of 10 games I’ve only had 3 games where everyone stayed a full round. I hope they make duos permanent after this and do away with trios.
9
maybe they could make trios last one week and keep duos at 2 weeks. or just cycle through them faster. i’m sure there are quite a few groups of 3 who want to play without a random
1
[deleted]
1
[deleted]
1
Less rewards as well, I haven’t even bothered with it yet and I’m not looking forwards to the clank challenges for the next event.
5
Anybody else think trios is harder than duos solo? In the times I’ve played I have lost by one of my players not being able to finish a race even though I got in the top 3 and then people quitting mid race- which is more likely to happen with two partners over one partner. Not looking forward to clank now :/
2
I think all good players are currently farming crowns and speedrunning the heck out of Lily Leapers. When this show is over and Clank appears, they'll join Trios.
3
2nd to last round was LL and I placed first. Our 3rd leg couldn’t make the finish line and we tied for 3rd. Fall Mtn. Final was a barn house tinder fire, absolute 🗑
1
Logically if you're an above-average player, you will have a harder time playing trios than duos since your score will have less impact on the final score. If you're a below-average player, you will have an easier time qualifying.