U.S. near deal for Nvidia (+AMD Epyc-equipped) supercomputer as it waits for delayed Intel machine -sources
reuters.com/technology/us-near-deal-nvidia-su...Posted Aug 25, 2021, 2:21 PM UTC
Posted Aug 25, 2021, 2:21 PM UTC
Kudos go out to u/Oneoverbeta, who linked additional background-information and full story on Argonne's and HPE's web-sites respectively. Seems components arriving now at Argonne for Polaris-installation. Again, thank you chap!
The supercomputer wars are going to be very exciting in the coming years. The big players (intel, AMD, and Nvidia) are working to be as vertically integrated as possible, and it’s leading to some interesting developments. It’s no wonder Nvidia wants to get their hands on ARM. They don’t want to rely on their competition for the processors to these types of contracts. Especially with both intel and AMD pushing their own GPU solutions. If I’m remembering correctly, this might be Nvidia’s first announced exascale contract, at least publicly. It’s a pretty significant gap compared to both intel and AMD, and it seems that Intel’s own delays is what gave them the opportunity. I would expect even if the ARM acquisition ends up in flames, nvidia is still going to pick up some ARM based chip maker, like Ampere.
It’s a pretty significant gap compared to both intel and AMD, and it seems that Intel’s own delays is what gave them the opportunity.
That bothers me actually the most! If it weren't for Intel's delays since 2018 with Xeon Phi, neither AMD nor nVidia would've gotten a chance to get that contract and Polaris wouldn't even existing, right? Blows my mind.
Hey OP — Your post has been removed as it is not in compliance with Rule 4. Please read the rules or message the mods for any further clarification.
Hey OP — Your post has been removed for not complying with rule 9. Please read the rules or message the mods for any further clarification
I'm sorry but I thought it actually was in compliance with rule #4 – I immediately made required comment to point out how it relates to AMD; Rule #4 states that …
“If a post is made and it is not clear how it relates to AMD, an explanation in the thread will be required that details why you believe it is relevant, if the post lacks said comment, it will be removed”
I followed the rule and made said explanatory comment accordingly.
Regarding rule #9; I guess if I wouldn't've had made such explanatory AMD-relation within the brackets, it would've been removed due to rule #4 – since the relation to anything AMD wasn't made evident enough to stay.
No rumour any longer: The Argonne National Laboratory confirmed “Polaris” via official press-release.
Polaris' Specs …
Delivers approx. 44 Petaflops peak double-precision, and ~1.4 Exaflops theoretical AI-performance
280× HPE Apollo 65xx Gen10 Plus systems, w/ 560 × 2^nd (Rome) and 3^rd (Milan) Gen AMD EPYC™ processors
2,240× Nvidia A100 nVidia^® GPU-accelerators /w Tensor-cores – ALCF’s largest GPU-based system to date
Using HPE's Slingshot high-performance Ethernet-fabric, designed for HPC and AI solutions
The Reuters-article also mentions …