I don't even know what to say... Accidental pro-life argument
Posted Sep 20, 2021, 2:47 AM UTC
1359
"Man oppressed women. So in order to obtain equality women must oppress men."
It's kinda this logic unfortunately
18
Kind of like when they say no womb no say, only women get a say..
But Roe vs Wade is written by men?
8
A: "Because the law looks at it from the child's perspective..."
B: "But it's just a clump of cells, right?"
A: "No, it's a baby if it's WANTED, if not, THEN it's a clump of cells. Duh!"
B: "Seems legit"
8
it's just that pro-choice people do not take issue with depriving people of life, that person would be killed if they were aborted so there's no issue with it then
I kind of hate how having children is less about the child itself now, like a woman may killer her own child for a multitude of reasons and that's fine to some but then they may want to have one later, I'm not sure how to explain it but it turns my stomach
1
They’re so close to realizing. so close….
4
So, substitute “man’s right not to pay child support” with “woman’s right to bodily autonomy” in that comment and it’ll be downvoted 1000 times instead.
and bodily autonomy and financial capability are equivalent how?
No, they're not. But neither of them can be elevated above the right to be alive.
Financial capability, as the way child support is enforced, greatly effects bosily autonomy, just not as directly as pregnancy.
If, 33% of your paycheck goes for child support guess what? You have to work 33% more for the same quality of life. Guess what? Now the child support amount may be raised.
This is extra relevant if the father does physical work.
Instead of 40 hour now you work about 56.
You cant or dont pay? Off to jail.
So yeah. It effects BA indirectly.