Why isn't there more discussion of the zombie invasion of Jerusalem on the first Easter?
According to Matthew 27:51–53, many dead saints came back to life after the ressurection and went to Jerusalem, where they were seen by many people.
And, behold, the veil of the temple was rent in twain from the top to the bottom; and the earth did quake, and the rocks rent; And the graves were opened; and many bodies of the saints which slept arose, And came out of the graves after his resurrection, and went into the holy city, and appeared unto many.
I've seen Christians trying to use the very few known historical fragments of information we have about the existence of Jesus to somehow "prove" that he must have been resurrected.
Yet this momentous event - lots of dead people rising up and wandering the streets of a city - seems to have every little discussion. Jerusalem was under Roman control at the time, surely an event like this would have been noticed and recorded?
The few discussions I have seen really jump through hoops to explain this away. They are caught between, on the one hand finding to find a reason to say that this part of the gospels might not be literally true, while on the other hand continuing to assert that all the other parts (including the various miracles and the resurrection) should be treated as historical evidence.
Surely they can't have it both ways?
Posted Nov 7, 2021, 10:08 AM UTC
Because it didn't happen
Nice logic.
the correct answer is i don't know because you are claiming you are doing the same as them relgious
Pics or it didn't happen. They are right
If only photoshop existed back then… would require cameras… and computers.. hmmm… magic stories it is…
An extraordinary claim presented without evidence can be dismissed without evidence; and in this case there is plenty of evidence against the existence of zombies.
what are you talking about zombies do exist
Define "zombie", then, because zombies do not exist for all commonly-held definitions of zombie.
Hi, im a pastafarian, we believe in the almighty Flying Spaghetti Monster, creator of the universe.
Some people don't believe in our religion because it is made up but like you said, they are claiming and thus are doing the same as us.
The sane approach is obviously to say the Flying Spaghetti Monster could be real or not and both are claims so it's a 50/50 chance right ?
Is there a precedent for people rising from the grave? No. However, there is a precedent for zombies not rising from the grave. So the claim that zombies rose from the grave is reasonable to dismiss without further evidence, and unreasonable to assert without further evidence. Get your false equivalence out of here.
I'm not sure if this applies to zombie invasions
That's not how logic and reason work