Making money while you’re sleeping
This is a crosspost from r/antiwork [my own post there]:
- Hussle
- Every time you make about $320ish bucks, you buy 1 share of Goldman Sachs
- Current dividend on a share of Goldman Sachs is $8.00
- At about 40 shares, the combined dividend pays for 1 share [share price dependent]
- You keep adding to shares you have, using the dividend to pay for more shares over time
- At about 1812 shares [stock price depending, dividend depending] you make minimum wage [if minimum wage increases: just add more shares]
- When you have enough shares, the dividend yield is minimum wage, 4 times per year
- 3/4 of that money you use to live, 1/4 of that money goes to buying more shares
- Now Goldman Sachs works for -you-. You don’t have to do jack squat and you still become rich. You don’t owe the man, you own the man
In the 2008 real estate crash, Goldman Sachs owned a whole lot of toxic assets. They sold those toxic assets right before the crash, to another bank. When the crash came and the toxic assets tanked, the other bank went belly up because they now had those toxic assets on the books.
Goldman Sachs is murderously serious about making money. Making money is what they do. You want to own them [partially] because they’ll pay you for owning shares.
The share price used to be around $200 a while back, the dividend was $5/share. That same share now yields 60% more. Keep those shares and over time that share will yield more dividend. The only thing you have to do is to keep them [diamond hands for the in-crowd].
Do the math. One share at a time. Goldman Sachs is not going to stop making money, they might as well be working for you.
Tell me why I’m wrong.
Posted Apr 25, 2022, 8:54 AM UTC
This whole post is “put hundreds of thousands of dollars into a dividend stock and collect the dividends”
Modern day Warren Buffet
Hundreds of thousands that's all? brb..
I dunno about that... sounds suspiciously like 30 years ago Warren Buffet.
So, using a format used by one of the richest people on the planet is clearly the wrong strategy. Roger that.
that was sarcasm, warren buffett is anti-dividend
sarcasm doesn’t translate well to flat text.