SomeArtistFan

Is it?

TL;DR: I do not understand the Faithkeepers well and would like to learn more.

I have played a fair bit of FP1 (around 30 hours) and chosen faith a few times, though I do not have played FP2 yet. Now, there is one main question on my mind, especially with the release of FP2: What is Faithkeeper theology like?

Fundamentally what I know is that they revere the Generator as a nigh-divine tool to solve the problem of the Eternal Winter and usher in a green paradise. I also know they have a structure somewhat inspired by the catholic church, or at least did during the FP1 days. They dislike body adaptation and other forms of making oneself wholly independent of the generator, and are also big

Is there an effective/consistent way to either enact the law or promote a revolution that enforces it? I've never even gotten slightly close to either, but would like to do so for a roleplay campaign soon - is there a specific interest group/personality overlap that promotes it, or something like it? Maybe a country specifically?

Any advice or thoughts are welcome, and thank you in advance! :)

I was gonna post this on the hoi4 subreddit originally but they don't allow text posts so here goes-

I bought hoi4 for my partner recently since I play and like the game a lot. I basically thought "I can explain it to them and show them a few vids and then we can play together, great!"

...in actuality of course that didn't quite work out. We played a few times but they always got confused, and the in-game tutorials certainly don't help either. They've also watched some videos I sent to them but hasn't managed to quite grasp the many intricacies you need to have fun with the game.

So, does anyone have advice to get someone "into" the game? Videos to watch, basic guides, simple advice on ho

Hello, I'm currently attempting a run as Goering in TWR and would like to avoid the civil war by appointing him as Hitler's successor. I've picked every decision that increases his power in events, as well as things like the party debates which increase his influence. I've also made a new constituion, picked the four year plan, everything.

Yet when I try appoint him as successor, it says that Hitler does not trust Goering. How do I fix this issue?

I want to have a nice CSA campaign but the game lags a lot by the time I finish the ACW like normal, so I'm wondering if it's possible to have a two-way civil war somehow. I know it at the very least used to exist in normal Kaiserreich, but I can't find any info on how to do it in Kaiserredux or even if it's possible.

Any help is appreciated, thanks :)

Hey there!

So, I've been trying for the past few hours to get the hussite monarchy path for Bohemia- Getting the revolution itself and the hussites wasn't a challenge at all, but now the event for the crowning of the monarch hasn't fired about four months after I won the revolution.I kind of assume that I won the war too quickly (there was one militia unit in Vienna and nothing else on the border) and so the event didn't fire, but maybe I'm wrong? Did I miss a focus I need to take, or if I really did mess up the event does anyone know the event ID (or how to get it)?

Any help is appreciated :D

I believe I saw a very nice painting on here a while ago, it was of Xi Jinping visiting a village (I think in the southwest) with excited people walking alongside him, it was in a very realistic style which stood out to me because everyone was wearing modern clothing not common in paintings of this style.

I'm sorry if my description isn't very good, and if this isn't allowed here I'll delete the post, but I'd love it if anyone knows the painting I'm referring to.

Thanks in advance <3

Bose in OTL was fairly politically ambiguous in some regards but is from what I've learned generally labeled either a simple nationalist or a fascist, since he did cooperate with Japan for an independent India

So I wonder why he's socialist in this timeline? I know that both the princely states and the bharatiya commune are opposed to imperialism which would draw Bose toward them, but that doesn't directly make him totalist (there's quite obvious parallels drawn between him and Mao in some aspects)

So why is it? Did the developers just decide that Bose changed his ideological stance because the situation called for it? That's not unreasonable of course, I'm mainly just interested

Zenz's articles are cited pretty often in topics regarding China, and while I know he's not a very trustworthy source I don't have anything specifically devaluing any of his stuff (state funding, personal views and motivations etc)

Is anyone able to help me out here?