eblees

First of all, I would like to state that I'm not trying to be arrogant or a smart ass, I just want have a better understanding of U.S. politics. My question is aimed at the moral fundamentals of libertarianism, not the efficiency or practicality of policies

My question is if a person can afford to hire bodyguards to protect his property or can protect his property and himself on his own, why should said person pay for policemen for society. is it morally wrong to force said person to pay for something he has no use for, but others will use using his money.

First of all, I would like to state that I'm not trying to be arrogant or a smart ass, I just want have a better understanding of U.S. politics. My question is aimed at the moral fundamentals of libertarianism, not the efficiency or practicality of policies

My question is if a person can afford to hire bodyguards to protect his property or can protect his property and himself on his own, why should said person pay for policemen for society. is it morally wrong to force said person to pay for something he has no use for, but others will use using his money.

First of all, I would like to state that I'm not trying to be arrogant or a smart ass, I just want have a better understanding of U.S. politics. My question is aimed at the moral fundamentals of libertarianism, not the efficiency or practicality of policies

My question is if a person can afford to hire bodyguards to protect his property or can protect his property and himself on his own, why should said person pay for policemen for society. is it morally wrong to force said person to pay for something he has no use for, but others will use using his money.

First of all I support gay right and gay marriage. but the argument for gay marriage which states it should be legal because its between consenting adults can also be used for polygamy. so why don't polygamist have a right to marry each other.

just a hypothetical question, on what YOU would do. the disability I'm referring to is down syndrome