qnull

Just checking. I'm level 100 with all my glyphs at 21 clearing 70+ NMD and I've found 35 runeshards total and I'm 90% sure those 35 came from a season theme cache not a NMD.

Have I missed something the patch notes? I didn't have this issue in S4

As the title says. Resolution is QHD.

HP T740 does it with optional graphics card but I cannot find a SKU/model number for this option.

I know this is easier with a workstation & graphics card but that’s the last resort.

Roof on our first home is a bit tired. Typical villa home with an iron roof. It doesn’t appear to have any water tightness issues that my untrained eyes can spot.

Looking for advice on roofing and who to reach out to and who to avoid

So, seems AUT is not going to follow AU and remain online. On campus in class learning (with measures taken) if you’re fully vaccinated.

I figure there’s not a chance in hell we get through semester 1 without an outbreak.

Praying for clear microphones for recorded content sessions this semester.

I recall reading a blog post or article from a Maersk IT employee that described the efforts they went through to recover from the NotPetya attack back in 2017.

I think it was released not long after Maersk announced mass layoffs due to outsourcing of the IT department but I can’t find the post/article/blog anymore.

EDIT: found it - https://gvnshtn.com/maersk-me-notpetya/

Seems I have come to a cross roads in my career and I’m wondering if anyone has any advice/regrets for adjusting to a “non-technical” role.

I’m currently a technical SME and an opportunity has come up for an analyst role.

The role would see me on a path into architecture eventually, but for now it would be mostly requirements gathering, process mapping and analysis.

I’m not sure how I will adjust to the different work type, for example, instead of issues/escalations/project input I’d be head down in a single multi-year project.

This can’t be a problem unique to my org, but our firewalls are managed by a vendor.

We send them the firewall requests and they implement the rules, but we’ve noticed that sometimes what’s asked is not what we get.

We also have no way to manage firewall rules that are no longer required. For example, if a service is decommissioned it’s up to that project/owner to submit the firewall requests to internal ICT to review and send to the vendor, but this almost never happens.

A third concern is our dev environments, because while we still audit and approve the rules, an uncomfortable percentage of them are “this is dev and we aren’t sure which of this 30 rules we actually need”

I know audi

Curious to hear the opinions of this sub on timesheeting/time tracking.

It’s a necessary evil, but the process at my current employer involves filling out a spreadsheet every week with a seperate spreadsheet for oncall rotations then uploading it into SAP.

Surely there must be a better way.

Edit: lots of great comments and experiences in this thread.

While I really would like to improve our systems, I should have stated that I am a salaried employee on an internal IT team and I work for a large national company, and all my time is billed to capital projects.

Our current SAP CATS spreadsheet system caters for a lot of the “businesses within a business” that we have and all the differe

This might be an itcareerquestion but I think I will get a better response here.

I’ve just moved into a technical governance role from my senior engineering role, and I think I’m dealing with a little bit of imposter syndrome.

I’ve had a few stints in managerial team leadership style roles, but I’ve never been responsible for systems architecture, design and governance.

I’ve been in roles that required me to design and build architecture, but I’ve never been responsible for making sure someone else’s design meets our criteria especially when their designs are in areas of personal weakness.

For example, I have a lot of experience with Windows, virtualisation and VDI infrastructure and l

Okay, I’m pretty average at Citrix and I think I can do this with an access policy but I just want to validate my thinking/get some other ideas.

What I need to achieve is this, users on corporate devices connecting via Workspace on their machines should not be able to launch a Desktop but should have access to their apps.

If those same users decide to connect from a BYOD machine running window 10 then they should be able to launch a Desktop.

What I don’t quite understand is how I can tell Citrix when the device is a BYOD device vs when it’s a corporate laptop via Workspace app.

I think the easiest way will be to just have staff connect to byod.domain.com via a browser and login, then

I’m not sure how to phrase this exactly, but recently I’ve realised that I am getting involved in projects that require me to engineer something to make 2 or more systems talk to each other.

A lot of the things I’m interacting with (Linux/JMS/APIs) are outside of my expertise as I come from a Windows background and used to administrate the usual suite (Exchange, Citrix, AD, etc.)

Thankfully, I don’t have to be an expert, but when I am asked to design something to make system A and system B talk through system C I get a bit stuck.

Surely someone else has done a similar transition, or someone knows where can I find some decent resources on Linux and systems intergration/API to get up to spe

I’m sure this is a common requirement for anyone that manages secure/critical environments.

My company has a need to utilise the real time data generated by one of our critical applications which is unfortunately in our strictest zone and seperate from the corporate network with no internet access.

Just fishing for opinions on how I might be able to achieve this, I haven’t looked at middleware/integration stacks ever so keen to hear opinions.

We do have security controls for this environment that requires the connections terminate at the next zone before passing on so I can’t pass through or go around a zone.

When I first heard about it I though some sort of automatic SFTP service mig

So, I’m trying to figure out if it is possible to do user/device based certificates as a second method of authentication through the Workspace app.

Everything that I have read so far suggests you need to have the endpoint analysis software installed and go in via the external gateways web interface.

What I am trying to achieve is essentially not having to go to the external NetScaler Gateway web interface and just have the user login to the Workspace app.

These machines aren’t domain joined but they are AzureAD connected machines.

Users can login to the Workspace app with traditional domain credentials but as this is an externally accessible interface I want to put a second measure on i

Found out that there’s only a 4% pay gap between our second tier support and third tier support teams (about $100/week) which seems ridiculous to me.

Both teams support the same stuff (Windows server, AD, Exchange, Citrix, VMware etc.) the only real difference is T2 does more “Operations” (Break/Fix) and T3 does more platform management (Patch/Upgrade) and has more “responsibility” + oncall.

To me this feels like the organisation doesn’t really value the T3 team because I know that another company in my city pays between 80-90k for senior (T3) guys while it seems like our guys are between 70-80k at both T2 & T3 (I’m middle of the road at 75 but on the T2 team).

Obviously pay is only