Please help settle a work debate

I was chatting with a friend at work today about hockey (I don't know anything about it) and the topic came out about how fighting at the pro levels is very much a part of the game, but at lower levels it is not. What was interesting to me was that the reasons why fighting is encouraged at the pro level don't necessarily disappear at lower levels, bar one.

My friend and I realised that there were four main reason why fighting is part of hockey:

  • It can change momentum
  • It gives the players a chance to catch a breath if they're gassed
  • It makes the game safer, by preventing poor behaviour from the other team
  • It protects your star players from bad treatment
  • It gets the crowd going which can provide additional support.

At lower level hockey, only the final point is irrelevant. The first four all apply whether you are playing in the NHL or at your local centre, and you could argue that in leagues where players aren't necessarily super fit, having two players scrap can give your team some time to heave some big ones in and get the oxygen back in your lungs.

The argument my friend made was that hockey is so violent already that any increase in this would be catastrophic, but I played rugby in Australia and the UK at the amateur level, and that was full contact with only a mouth guard as protection. I finished up at 29, and I certainly wasn't the oldest. Bruises and being sore on the sunday after was expected, but such is the nature of playing a contact sport.

So, hockey players, what am I missing?

Posted Oct 31, 2023, 7:54 PM UTC

176
puckOmancer•

It you're wondering why there isn't fighting in beer league, it's because you get suspended for it. Why do players get suspended for it? Because if beer league allowed fighting like in the pros, their insurance premiums would go through the roof. This would discourage people from joining leagues because of not wanting to have their heads caved and the fees would be prohibitively high. The leagues want to make money, so fighting is a no-no.

At the beer league levels. It's not violent at all. Yes, there will always be idiots that run around thinking they're tough, but they're beer league tough. Most incidents are two fat guys shoving each other. Their jaw muscles jabbering get more work than their fists. Because they know as soon as the gloves come off, they're suspended. If it's bad enough, it might be for the season or for life.

As for the reasons you came up with, yeah... When I was born Bobby Orr was in his prime. I'm not anti-fighting in the least. But I've also been alive long enough to hear, smell, and realize the excuses don't really hold much water.

Changing momentum? I'm very skeptical. So two 4th line guys pummel each other. Whoopie. The guys who have the greatest impact on the game are the stars. They're still playing. If a star ends up fighting a 4th line guy, it's not a momentum change. It's a poor strategic choice. I've heard NHL players say, from their perspective on the ice, there's no such thing as momentum.

In terms of giving guys a chance to breath. Yeah, no. At the pro levels, they're in such good shape, they do workouts after the games to wind down. Also, there's a reason there are shifts. Players are on the ice 45 seconds. They don't need 3-4 minute delay to catch their breaths.

In terms of protecting star players, maybe in the past, but now, nah. There's a reason the goon is all but extinct in the NHL. In the 80's you had guys with 400+ penalty minutes in a season as a league leaders. Last year the leader had 150. The all time leader in penalty minutes has nearly 4000. They played in the 80's. The current active penalty minute leaders have around 1300, and they're nearing the end of their careers.

Also with all the cameras now, players can't get away with things like they used to. And a big suspension can mean hundreds of thousands of dollars lost to the player.

5
HalfBlueCat1OP•

What about at the amateur level. If you’re totally gassed and two guys go for it, doesn’t that give you a chance to suck it in and get back out there?

1
puckOmancer•

No, because people get enough rest from simply line changing.

And like I said, people get suspended for fighting at the beer league level, and if you get suspended for the season that's like flushing $800+ down the toilet. That's an expensive way to catch your breath. It'd be easier to trip someone and spend 2 minutes in the box or simply skip your next shift.

1
jimjkelly•

I do not understand the argument that fighting keeps people in check. There was so much dirty shit back in the day, certainly no less than now. Similarly if you’ve watched any of the euro leagues where fighting is largely non-existent, it’s not like you are seeing a huge up-tick in dirty plays.

1
Express-Drummer526•

I play and referee beer league Hockey in Australia a few nights a week and generally there is a fight around once a week usually just 2 guys who have given each other a little behind the play slash/trip or something a little dirty. Fights result in suspensions generally for both players so it’s just stupid and not worth it at low level hockey, and it just pisses the other 20+ people who are there to just play hockey at 11pm on a Tuesday night or whatever. Fighting has no place in low level/recreational hockey.

1
Express-Drummer526•

I play and referee beer league Hockey in Australia a few nights a week and generally there is a fight around once a week usually just 2 guys who have given each other a little behind the play slash/trip or something a little dirty which leads to them feeling the need to roll around on the ice with each other. Fights result in suspensions generally for both players so it’s just stupid and not worth it at low level hockey, and it just pisses the other 20+ people who are there to just play hockey at 11pm on a Tuesday night or whatever. Fighting has no place in low level/recreational hockey.

1
HalfBlueCat1OP•

This is so interesting. As an Australian, I don’t expect people to fight if you’re playing kick to kick at a park, but if you’re lining up at Shute Shield level or VAFA A Grade then you realize people aren’t just there to get some exercise. Those games are full contact and full intensity, minus the paycheck

1
TheShovler44•

Sometimes a guy just pisses you off so you have a tilt. Some takes a whack or sprays your goalie. Protecting the “superstar” is bottom rung though they can fend for themselves. Unless it’s something completely blatant. Still there’s etiquette if you fight you don’t just fight anybody.

1
ReverendMak•

Lower levels of hockey are often not full-contact, and players often are required to wear face cages.

Also, unless you live in rural Canada, you probably don’t have any rural Canadians playing in your beer league. Those boys are different.

1

There is staged grandstand fighting and then there’s anger fueled, team mate protection fighting. I’m not stage fighting anyone, but if you don’t act right on Sunday night and you’re putting peoples health at risk, I’m gonna risk your health right back.

1
dbergman23•

There used to be a league in Canada that was all about the fighting. You would see 8-10 fights a game, with some hockey sprinkled in there. With the concussions, they tried to take it out, and from what i understood, attendance went down.

  • It can change momentum
    • This is one of the main drivers. Some times it works, others it doesnt. Rumors were that a while ago a coach would tell a player to get into fights for the sake of this outcome. However that has mostly gone by the wayside as players understand what long term damage from fighting can cause.
  • It gives the players a chance to catch a breath if they're gassed
    • This would be the weakest reason, and is most likely not true any more. A fighter is primarily on the 4th line, and probably not seeing much of the ice already. Better to not fight and not potentially land your team in an lopsided penalty.
  • It makes the game safer, by preventing poor behaviour from the other team
    • It doesnt prevent it, but does show consequences. The general rule is that you dont touch star players, because they've got a guy to fight for them. Now a days, you have to stand up for yourself more often than not.
  • It protects your star players from bad treatment
    • No, but its what they say its supposed to be there for. Most of the time, someone will run at your star, get off the ice and refuse to defend themselves. Then the rest of your team might just get more chippy than before.
  • It gets the crowd going which can provide additional support.
    • I see this one for sure. But if the crowd needs a fight to start cheering, then you're not playing good hockey in the first place (and point 1 is the reasoning).

Honestly, the NHL is full of men that have played for a long time. Most are 27-30 years old, and that means they've been playing professional hockey for about 8 years. Testosterone is killer for men in this age, and hockey players are no exception. The NHL recognizes this and doesnt prevent them from fighting for mainly 2 reasons. 1 money (good fights can bring a lot of attention to the sport), and 2 hopefully it gets the angryness out of the players so they can focus on good hockey.

1

I think fighting probably sells tickets in fringe leagues. I just watched a YouTube video about a guy named “diamond hands” that beats everyone up and the crowd seems to love him, I think he legit moves tickets.

For amateur/beer league if you fight you are a joke and probably no one likes you.

1
UnreadThisStory•

Yeah my experience is guys who get into a lot of fights in beer league typically have off-ice emotional issues..

1
cubs_070816•

i've never once seen an actual fistfight in a beer league game.

pros fight (in north america, at least) for many of the reasons you listed: to police the game, protect a star, change momentum and get the crowd involved.

it's still dumb, especially when it's planned before a face-off or something.

ice is hard. head injuries are real. let's evolve, people.

1
dicky72•

I'd argue with the assessment that fighting is "very much part of the game".

I think it happens in the game, but it isnt necessarily part of the game, anymore. Fights for the most part are reactionary to a situation in game. It honestly comes down to testosterone and adrenaline. You have a bunch of alpha males flying around in an ultra competitive environment with livelihoods on the line running into each other...at some point tempers will flare.

recreational hockey misses a few of those elements. Ultra competitive, livelihood on the line...without those you just have the adrenaline and testosterone, which do exist, and you'll see tempers flare in these leagues... but without the pace, and competitive nature existing...it just doesnt come to front as often.

1
Link_Save_HyruleSince I could walk•

Fighting exists because the players policed themselves, part of old time hockey. Teams used to have a player deemed "the enforcer" whose primary purpose in a nutshell was to keep the other team in check. Over the years, more rules came into play that this wasn't deemed as necessary. Also, the game got faster and the enforcer was pretty much phased out to put more skilled players on the roster. As far as "lower levels" if you're referring to rec hockey, you pay to play not get paid to play. If you're asking why there's no fighting or why it's not allowed in rec or beer league whatever you want to call it, then this is a stupid argument that should be self explanatory. If you're referring to minor league hockey, they do have fights maybe even more than the NHL. NCAA and maybe junior hockey (not sure about all junior leagues) players wear face cages and that's just stupid to punch someone wearing a face cage you'll hurt your hand obviously. Also some of the lower professional leagues (AHL, ECHL, European leagues, college, junior, etc) fighting is an automatic ejection and possible suspension. Your point about players getting gassed and they can rest never really heard of that being a thing and if it is probably the rarest of rare reasons. Point three and four are basically the same thing.

1
DiggWuzBetter•

Fighting exists in pro hockey (and other high level hockey like juniors and whatnot) because it’s considered part of the entertainment value of the sport, for fans. The fights themselves are entertaining, and it makes the sport feel more rugged.

It’s not somehow necessary - sports like football and rugby are more physical/violent than hockey, and they don’t have fighting, because the leagues choose to punish it harshly. It’s mostly absent from lower level hockey, even full contact leagues, for the same reason - ppl don’t want the long suspensions. The NHL (and other high level leagues with light fighting punishments) could easily choose to eliminate fighting if they wanted to, via long suspensions for fighting, but they choose not to.

1
HalfBlueCat1OP•

Great answer

2
Frankie__Spankie10+ Years•

Define lower level hockey.

If it's beer league, somebody has to practically murder somebody for me to want to fight them. Anyone who fights in a league they have to pay to play needs to get their head checked.

1
BevoBrisket26•

You have work in the morning. Taking a puck to the face is part of the game / a possibility so playing with that risk is known and adopted by players. Some beer leaguer taking out his anger issues on other adults in a B game via picking fights is not part of the game, nor are refs or any members of the league or rink paid enough to deal with that. Cost of insurance and dealing with that portion of risk overly outweighs the strategic benefit of a fight in youth - adult non professional hockey.

NHL players making upwards of 10k at the league minimum to over 100k per game play by a different standard as it’s their job / part of the entertainment that is professional sports

1
killing_my_ass•

IMO it's way simpler. People like bloodsport.

1

I think the biggest reason to why it’s a part of hockey is that it holds players accountable for their actions on the ice. You do something stupid you’re gonna find out by getting your shit rocked.

I’d rather this than if fighting were banned and players resort to cheap shot tactics which can be a lot more damaging to the player than a fight

1
HalfBlueCat1OP•

So why is it only in the NHL where it is tolerated? Are the lower leagues better behaved?

1

no in the lower leagues like junior a, b, and c fighting is prevalent and is that thing that holds players accountable for their actions. So they can’t run their mouths and not have to back it up

1

Honestly there’s nothing more embarrassing than watching two beer league players trying to punch each other. They’re not that strong, they’re not good fighters, and there isn’t a good reason for it - it’s often due to an accidental error because of lack of skill, and someone’s feelings got hurt at a perceived attack. I’ve played beer league most of my adult life and fighting is never necessary. If players need to catch their breath they can make a change, or ice the puck.

1
HSDetector•

Fighting satisfies only the blood thirsty and nothing more. True hockey fans want to watch clean, fast hockey, not fighting.

1
FullyPackedOO•

It sells tickets. That's it

1