Am I a fat-shaming shitlord, or is she lying about her dimensions? You decide. Bonus in the story section.
mybodygallery.com/photos-40935-body-shape.htm...Posted Apr 7, 2014, 11:54 AM UTC
4552
mybodygallery.com
Maybe she confused kg and lb?
31
No way is she 161kg.
10
161kg is totally plausible here.
8
That would be 357 lbs.... which I very much doubt.
I was 357 lbs for a while. Gut was about that size, but my man-boobs were (thank fuck) significantly smaller, and I'm significantly taller.
I'd guesstimate her weight at mid to upper 200's. So just good ol' lying, not a misunderstanding of conversions.
9
Perhaps she mistyped 161 instead of 261, which would be plausible.
9
And the waistband of her pants is at least two sizes too small. The only reason they "fit" is because the waistband is elastic and it's obvious that her fupa is stretching it to its limits.
5
[deleted]
8
That's exactly what I thought.
2
Yeah...she's not being truthful. I'm 5'7" and when I'm wearing a size 20 my weight is around 250lbs. There's no way she's 161lbs. Especially not with the muffin top above the size 20 waistline.
19
Report it as miscatagorized.
Nothing says you're a bit delusional than a shame-free website pulling your photo down for blatantly lying.
Report photo, miscatagorized.
15
To be fair, she does have her pants size listed as 20, which is pretty large. I really feel sorry for her poor bra though...it's being eaten by side fat, she really needs to go up a few band sizes.
12
Hey, my pant size is 32........................................ by 32.
I think I'm like a 15 in women's?
10
In the US?? I think you'd be...a 14...which is still 4" off of a size 20 (36" waist) based off of the size guide for jeans....and probably 8" smaller in the hips. I suck at height/weight though, sorry.
5
I am a size 6-8 at 36", so, probably a 2? Women have flared hips. Also, our pants measure the hip, not the waist.
Remember: Dat vanity sizing
3
She says she is 161 and a size 20. I'm calling bull shit. A 12 was loose on me at 161
2
Yeah, that bra. Ouch. Bras that actually fit can even be a little big uncomfortable if the underwire pokes in at a weird way. I can't imagine how that must feel. For the love of god, get a professional bra fitting.
1
She needs up a couple cup sizes, too, and probably should be wearing a full cup style bra. My boobs hurt just looking. :/
1
Typo? She's more like 261 lbs
10
I don't think you type it in there, I think you select.
3
[deleted]
7
more like 250 I'd guess. When I weighed 200 I looked WAY smaller than that.
6
At 5'7 I would honestly think she is more than that. I might look like that around 200 lbs, but I'm only 5'3.
1
[deleted]
1
No way, try 250-275
1
She's gotta be bigger than that. I'm 5'8" and at 235, I was a size 18. I'd say she's 250-270
1
She is lying. As someone 5'6 and 160 at my heaviest, I was wearing a size 10 pants, (some brands 12), and Medium shirts. If she was an inch taller she should be the same size. Or at least if it's all in her ass, her pants may be bigger but then her shirt size should be smaller. She may be 200 or something.
6
She's quite a bit over 200. I'm 5'6" and was 220ish at my highest. I never looked like that and wore a size 16 pants. Why do people so blatantly lie about weight?
10
[deleted]
5
When I was 160ish at 5'2" I was a size 14 or so. She is way lying. To look like that and wear that size, add 80 pounds.
4
I'm 5'7" and weigh 148 lbs. There is no way the weight she listed is accurate.
3
Chiming in that she's a liar. I'm 5'7" and when I was 250 I was a size 16/18 and am now a size 12/14 at 210 (slowly getting there man).
3
She looks a lot like me shape wise. I'm 5'7 and weigh 230lbs.
3
Here is someone who is 5'7 and 220 pounds.
And here is the person OP linked, at 5'7 and "160" pounds.
Yeah.
3
No fucking way is that right. I'm 5'5" and 235 and look better than her-and I wear size 14 trousers. At 161 I'd be a size 8/10 and looking barely chubby.
2
I am 5'5" right now and 160, I look NOTHING like her. I had that much stomach pudge when I was close to 240. this is 5'5" me at 165 ignore the weird smile
and at 160 first ever strapless dress
either that, or my scale is lying to me and I am an anorexic bitch because I pay attention to what I shove in my gut hole and occasionally get on my treadmill. I must be unhealthy because I am ignoring my "body cues" that I "need" to eat every 2 hours.
2
I am 5'7" and 157 pounds (size 10) and I assure you, I do not look like that. Even at 180 pounds, I didn't look like that woman, and I was a size 16 at the time. She's lying like a sack of shit, man.
2
My ex was 5'3", weighed 160 and was nowhere near that fat.
Bitch it totes lying about her weight.
2
It's possible she made a mistake and meant to write 261. It's human error, not delusional lying I think. There's just no way she can accept she's a size 20 and think she's 161lbs.
2
161 and size 20? Hmm, I'm 180 and a size 12. And I'm only 4 inches taller than this woman. Methinks there's been some mismeasurement.
1
She's definitely lying about her weight. I'm 5'4, around that weight, and look way better than that.
She is definitly lying. At 161, I was MUCH less fatty than that.
Same. Even at my biggest (~169 lbs) I was still under a pant size 20. I wore maybe a 14 pant size, and I'm like, 4" shorter. Like wtf no unless she is 161 kg she is not 161
165 and pant size 10. Granted I'm 5'9, so the weight has an extra two inches to stretch over.
Those are my approximate dimensions. To be fair, I usually feel that fat, but I know I'm not. And every other submission is a lot slimmer.
[deleted]
5'10". At one point I weighed in at 182. Even then I only wore a size 12. No fuckin way is she that size and a pant size 20.
Yup, definitely lying... 5'5" and 165lbs here, and oh, a size 10 pant...
I'm 5'6" and 190. I'm a size 14/16 in pants. There's some measurement fudging going on here.