Verizon can't tell new HTC phones apart in its latest ad
theverge.com/2014/8/20/6050459/verizon-cant-t...Posted Aug 20, 2014, 8:45 PM UTC
Posted Aug 20, 2014, 8:45 PM UTC
Who fucking cares lol
[deleted]
As much as I hate Verizon with a fiery passion, I assume someone in the marketing settlement just decided the remix looked better for the picture or didn't bother to look at the subtle differences while moving around stock photos... either way, I doubt this is really a reflection on the company itself...
Aka, tis a silly article.
Apparently no one here can tell the difference either
I read the article.
How are these "two different phones"? They are both technically "The HTC One (M8)". So Verizon has a nickname for one of them. So what? I hate Verizon as much as the next guy but this article title isn't just sensationalist, it's just plain wrong.
The one on the right (running android) isn't a HTC One m8, It's a HTC one mini 2.
Weird. The article sys (or said when I read it) that it was an M8 model running Windows phone that Verizon had a name for.
The article says it's the HTC One remix, aka the VZW version of the one mini 2.
The model running Windows Phone is an actual M8. The other phone is an HTC One Remix.
Because one of them isn't an M8...
Looks like you didn't...
It's not even Verizon. It's a marketing firm that Verizon hired.
Do they not know about Google? Or search engines?
[deleted]
That's not what they're saying. They're saying that the phone on the right actually isn't even an M8, and they're right (it's a smaller variant that's not called the M8)
Thanks, I stand corrected.
Yeah, though who could really blame them for not being able to keep all of HTC's shit straight.
Try actually reading the article, not just the headline and the pictures
Am I missing something? That's definitely Windows Phone on the left model and Android with BlinkFeed on the right?
You're missing something alright... like the entire point of the article
The one on the right is a smaller version of the One, it's not an M8.
ITT: People who didn't read the article. . .
More like "In Every Thread"