Is 'dark money' boosting Bernie Sanders?
publicintegrity.org/2016/01/21/19167/dark-mon...
publicintegrity.orgPosted Jan 21, 2016, 5:57 PM UTC
012
publicintegrity.orgI searched this article to see if it had been downvoted into oblivion from the r/politics echo chamber. I was not disappointed.
2
Less than 2 minutes up and it's already downvoted.
Sigh, children.
-4†
Positive Sanders story = upvotes.
Negative Sanders story = downvotes.
It reminds me of when Ron Paul was running.
3†
This isn't even negative. It's just stupid, and disingenuous.
Sorry you're in the minority of people who any tell the difference.
0†
What's disingenuous about it? The headline asks is Sanders benefitting from dark money, and the article answers yes, he is. It then points to the 501(4)(c) that takes money from anonymous donors and uses the money to run pro-Sanders advertisements. Also known as, "dark money". At what point were any infactual or misleading statements made?
1
[deleted]
0
Was that even negative?
-1
[deleted]
1
[removed]
-2
Someone's paranoid...
-2†
posts on r/politics
sits, waits for up/downvotes
"Why doesn't everyone love my disingenous posting???"
3†
Well, seeing that fucking KARL ROVE is spending money to help Sanders in NH and Iowa pretty much tells you all you need to know.
-5†
That Karl Rove is an idiot I thought we learned that lesson already?
2
Q: Is 'dark money' boosting Bernie Sanders?
A: Yes, against his own will. In this case, that's what makes it 'dark' money.