[deleted]•

[deleted]

11
AvonBarksdaleCallingThe more you talk, the more things sound the same•

Total Men in US 1,323,133

0.40947734578544626%

Though if the age range wasn't 35-54 (narrow that down, good lord) it would be much lower. Still trying to figure out if this calculator is the kind that makes me stabby where it doesn't understand not all of these are independent variables.

edited to add for fun that I am apparently either 1 of 1, 2 or 4 depending on how trash person I am with exercising at any given time. So yeah, I don't think this is really very accurate

8
Crim_de_menthe•

It’s been posted here before, it treats them as independent variables

6
AvonBarksdaleCallingThe more you talk, the more things sound the same•

Ah thanks. I wasn't quite sure because the way this one was set up I could see how it might possibly be using data from people who actually identified as each thing and then extrapolating out.

4
TaleofTwoDerpsOP~Tell me I'm pretty~•

Total Men in US 1,323,133

DAAAAMN mine was like 11 ~ 12k. Also yeah, that age range is ridiculous. It should be broken down into smaller increments, but I think they pull census data which uses similar scales.

3
AvonBarksdaleCallingThe more you talk, the more things sound the same•

Not caring about dick size really helps apparently.

6
[deleted]•

[deleted]

5
AvonBarksdaleCallingThe more you talk, the more things sound the same•

I mean ideally I would like a one to be present sadly.

Otherwise I definitely would have started dating women long ago.

2
aechtI'm aware.•

stealing my line

2
TaleofTwoDerpsOP~Tell me I'm pretty~•

Yeah, not caring about cup size didn't change much of anything for me...

1
kai333Nap daddy 😭•

25-54 (narrow that down, good lord)

lol no kidding. 'slightly younger' to 'hi dad, meet daddy' age range.

3
AvonBarksdaleCallingThe more you talk, the more things sound the same•

My bad, typo. It was 35-54 but still. That is a literal generation.

I also had to include younger than I would go because of the 26-34 category.

5
kai333Nap daddy 😭•

still tho, the age brackets for most people in 'our' demo would have to choose 26-54 to actually encapsulate who we're looking for. Like, dang people, chunk that 34-54 bracket in 2!

3
WhatDoYaFiggaTigga•

Doesn't matter. It only takes one beautiful idiot with poor taste and worse judgement.

7
[deleted]•

[deleted]

4
TaleofTwoDerpsOP~Tell me I'm pretty~•

Welcome to American then.

1
kai333Nap daddy 😭•

Hmm... apparently 19-25 yo, >100K making, post graduate degree having, Asian, single, poly, catholic, libertarian, underweight, 150+ min/wk exercisin, hetero, doesn't have kids but wants, over 5'8", with E+ cup women don't exist.

(7.30699236900864e-11 % apparently. no that's not my preference, just trying to see the least likely combo. ;))

For the record my 'real' pref was 1,059,311 / 0.327%

4
AvonBarksdaleCallingThe more you talk, the more things sound the same•

Her EE cup boobs tipped her just over the line on the BMI scale. Tragedy really.

4
KazanFuck the Alt-Right/Neofascists•

30lbs in the bra can do that easily.

Edit: the woman who told me this, and the discover magazine article claiming it were inaccurate.

-2
AvonBarksdaleCallingThe more you talk, the more things sound the same•

I really hope you're not serious

5
KazanFuck the Alt-Right/Neofascists•

A pair of D-cup breasts weighs between 15 and 23 pounds—the equivalent of carrying around two small turkeys

http://discovermagazine.com/2005/nov/physics-of-bras

I know a gal who is a 32I (as in Island)

EDIT: Discover Magazine fucked up

-2
Vagabond21COUGAR BAIT•

makes that 99% match 0% enemy I found on okcupid seem much more rare than I thought

edit: forgot to mention she actually lived in LA. Only like 3 freeways stood between us.

4
spock-amok29/M•

9,652 women wtf?

(26-34yo, >$50k, bachelor's+, not religious (except Jewish), not conservative, not overweight, doesn't want kids.)

3
Milazzo32/F/NYC/A Very Sophisticated Bot•

I bet the "doesn't want kids" alone eliminated a full million women. Go back and test that.

3
mybro4saleThe prettiest princess•

Bumped me from 1.5m to 0.11m.

3
Milazzo32/F/NYC/A Very Sophisticated Bot•

Yuuupp, it's a much more dramatic shift than me adding men who don't want kids.

5
mybro4saleThe prettiest princess•

So more men don't want kids? Interesting.

3
Zorin8•

And 1/4th of americans are overweight or something

-1
AvonBarksdaleCallingThe more you talk, the more things sound the same•

This is why those variables are not all independent thing comes into play.

Age, race and income all will cause a huge variance in obesity statistics for instance.

3
KazanFuck the Alt-Right/Neofascists•

3/4ths

Percent of adults aged 20 and over with obesity: 39.8% (2015-2016)
Percent of adults aged 20 and over with overweight, including obesity: 71.6% (2015-2016)

https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/obesity-overweight.htm

2
Milazzo32/F/NYC/A Very Sophisticated Bot•

Got it working on mobile: 238,803 men in the US. .07% of the population. It only goes up 100k if I add 26-34 year old men in.

However - I ran my stats in the male version and I am one of only 196 women in the country. That's fascinating, I would love to brunch with the rest of them.

3
TaleofTwoDerpsOP~Tell me I'm pretty~•

"Hi, I'm here with my reservation for 197".

4
Milazzo32/F/NYC/A Very Sophisticated Bot•

Seriously, can you imagine out of the entire fucking country you are one of 196 women who are white, single, hetero, monogamous, have college degree, don't want kids, over 5'6", make over 100k, whatever politics, whatever religion, and healthy weight.

Actually, I went back and realized I selected the wrong age, it is now down to 90. NINETY FUCKING WOMEN IN THE WHOLE COUNTRY. Jesus.

2
AvonBarksdaleCallingThe more you talk, the more things sound the same•

I'm one of either 1, 2, or 4 depending on exercise habits. And that even included three different options for religion (Jewish, unaffiliated and other). Height is a lot of it, but damn.

(Or more likely it's not the best calculator ever)

3
BigLebowskiBot•

You said it, man.

2
RanTheRedCedarMod Zedong•

66k. Like 0.02%

2
TaleofTwoDerpsOP~Tell me I'm pretty~•

Haha, mine was significantly lower than that...

I'm gonna die alone.

2
RanTheRedCedarMod Zedong•

I did this matching my gf's stats. 1 total or 5.5-7%

1
TaleofTwoDerpsOP~Tell me I'm pretty~•

Yep, I just did my ex's with some variance and she is roughly 1 of 500 in the US.

2
kharper4289Not gay but $20 is $20•

Total women in US 44,842

% of population 0.013877567220817658%

fuk

2
mybro4saleThe prettiest princess•

Total women in US (1,582,784)
% of population 0.4898327147869224%

If I don't want kids, it drops it down to .03% and 110K people.

When I fill it out for the opposite sex and fill in my own statistics, I'm

Total Men in US - 724
% of population - 0.000224288050217198%

Turns out I'm special. My momma was right.

2
FarBeyondtheSunrokc supersoldier•

Total women in US

800,103

% of population

0.2476123803648%

progressive, single, childless, 19-34, not overweight

Okay I guess I die alone 🙃

2
[deleted]•

[deleted]

1
TaleofTwoDerpsOP~Tell me I'm pretty~•

Try using this better link?

http://www.iwonderifyouareoutthere.com/

1
Milazzo32/F/NYC/A Very Sophisticated Bot•

It's not loading for me at all.

3
viperstrike05sweaty crocker•

same here

3
Milazzo32/F/NYC/A Very Sophisticated Bot•

Oh good, I deleted because I figured I was insane or something.

3
TaleofTwoDerpsOP~Tell me I'm pretty~•

Might be something else then. I literally load both pages in under a second.

2
[deleted]•

[deleted]

1
KazanFuck the Alt-Right/Neofascists•

jfc. less than a 10th of a percent. i knew it was bad being poly but jesus.

edit: stats

Age 26-54 (too fucking wide of a range, seriously)
Income: 50k+ (I've done the 'vastly vastly disparate incomes' thing. no thank you)
Education: High School+
Religion: Unaffiliated
Politics: Liberal/progressive
Weight: Healthy weight or overweight
Self-identifed as: hetereo/bi/other
Children: Don't have, Don't want

0.02%

adding "Mutually agreed to be open/poly"

0.0008%

1
hiddenmuensterNot dead yet, getting better, would like to go for a walk•

Using my stats, it says there are 80 other ppl like me. Time to go all Highlander...

1
amilikefunny•

a project called “i wonder if you are out there” deserves much greater treatment than this travesty of a site

1
ReyF33331/F/Glasgow•

Approx 180,000 guys. Scaling down for the size of Glasgow and assuming similar statistics that's 600 guys. Not too bad

1