Apartments in Melbourne
A few nights ago, my family was discussing property, I brought up that I am looking at buying an apartment in the city (in the future, I am not close to having the funds right now), as that is where most of the work in my industry (software development) is, and I want to reduce travel time to work as much as possible, which would also allow me to forgo public transport and car costs, as I would be able to bike pretty much everywhere.
However, it was brought up that it was not necessarily a good investment to buy an apartment in the city, partially because it's just difficult to get into the market (apparently it just doesn't work the same way as houses/units in the suburbs?), and the prices are supposed to remain mostly stagnant. I have doubts about the accuracy of these statements, I cannot imagine one area staying stagnant while prices rise in the rest of the state, but admittedly I do not know too much about this stuff. Is this actually true?
Thanks in advance, guys :)
Posted Jan 21, 2020, 12:48 AM UTC
Your family is correct. I find it concerning that your views are echoed on subs like this - it shows how little research ppl do when making investment decisions.
It seems to me ppl make decisions to buy apts based on some strange notion that 'it is always better to buy then to rent'. You have to ask yourself - why do you believe this? Have you actually done research and compared your investment options?
[deleted]
Interest is dead money too
Property doubles every seven years! Every three years if you negative gear
10 jokes to make you laugh, here is #1
Capital growth can convert to real money
When you are buying an apartment, you are buying a tiny share of that piece of land that "god" created. The value has been added by the developer by using that same piece of land and then extending it upwards into the sky. The developer then takes that added value back by selling the apartment for a lot more than it costs to build.
Your argument works better when you buy a dwelling on it's own block of land.
Good points, but I think you missed his sarcasm.
[deleted]
I love this argument, because interest repayment money is also "dead money" by their definition
Bank interest repayments are dead money by anyone's definition.
Apartments aren’t land, that’s part of the issue
[deleted]