THE CULLING IS BACK!
Posted May 12, 2020, 4:36 PM UTC
9323
Yeah its pretty bs
8
It's pay2pay, not pay2play
5
Even old arcade games wasnt that scummy. At least I didn't had daily limit on playing them.
1
Lol imagine you die in 5 minutes and have to wait a whole day to play again
5
more like 10 second lol
1
[removed]
2
:(
1
[removed]
1
[removed]
1
Stupid ass system
1
Holy fuck I thought this was a meme until I saw that video. This is pathetic.
1
Yeah well cant find any matches on xbox one, which is a shame cause before they took it off I used to play it alot and you would almost always get a match.
1
I actually think it's fine. You can buy a month pass for almost nothing. This is probably the only way that the developers can actually keep the game alive long term. Nobody cares enough about funny hats to spend money on them so monetizing aesthetics didn't work.
-9
they couldn't keep the game alive if it was totally f2p with 0 micro transactions, with other FREE br's like warzone and fortnite, nobody cares about the culling.
filter this subreddit by new, and ignore the posts that are less than 4 days old, there are about 4 new threads here per month.
the developers have deluded themselves into thinking that they still have a fanbase that wants nothing more than the culling 1, back again. they need to wake up and realise that nobody cares about their third re-release of their 2016 game that literally nobody asked for.
IF there where thousands of posts on this sub in the last few years begging for the game back because everyone loved it soooo much, and xaviant came back and said, "ok, we'll bring it back, but because there are only a few thousand of you asking, we'll have to have a sub fee to make it viable" then sure, but do not delude yourself into thinking thats what this is.
7
Monetizing aesthetics works just fine in literally every successful F2P game, or add in a little progress booster for reward cosmetics and similar crap.
When your game has already died multiple times due to a lack of player base in a market that's primarily F2P with heavy cosmetic buy in, coming back with a pay to own AND pay to play model is just insanely idiotic. It's like just when you thought Xavient couldn't make any worse decisions, they flip on their heads and shit in their own mouths.
3
Buddy, this is NOT gonna keep the game alive long term. Not even short term.
2
[removed]
1
[removed]
1
Shhhh, you can't say that here. It's just a cashgrab. Has to be. No other way.
0
Of course it is. How can you be so blind?
0
Do you think they run their servers with love and compassion?
1
Imaging trying to compete with other battle royal games THAT late with abysmal idea that will lower your player base EVEN more than Culling 2 had on day 1. IMAGINE!!!
Honestly the only reason why OG culling was so big is because it came out in that weird time period before PUBG and Fortnite were out and battle Royale only existed in Minecraft and arma lobbies. Once big names made BR games it was over for this game and it's probably never coming back imo
I remember The Culling's original launch. I was so excited because it was basically Minecraft Hunger Games: The Game. Honestly that's all they had going for them and here we are four years later, the genre dried up and they still have nothing new to offer.