New Job Offer: Base no Bonus vs Lower Base w Bonus
A classic question - but most responses I've seen have the Base2+Bonus to be equal or close to Base1 where its an obvious answer...
I have an offer at the same company for 170K with 10% bonus OR 175K with no bonus. So the on bonus earnings is decently higher than just base. edit to add: The thing is, this is a scale up and they don't have any bonus structure in place yet, so my manager would have to figure out an agreeable bonus structure.
Any thoughts?
edit: in the country I live in, bonus is taxed as income
Posted Jan 6, 2022, 12:55 PM UTC · edited
This is a strange offer, with the two base salaries so close together.
It tells me the company doesn’t put a lot to value behind the bonus (maybe not high likelihood of paying out in full?)
Unless the bonus is substantial and highly likely, I would almost alway opt for higher base pay. That’s the foundation for raises, and perhaps a future bonus on a larger number.
This right here.
I once left a job with base+RSU to take a job with base+bonus+bonus. The new job theoretically paid about 15% more and came with a better title (but at a smaller company).
On one of the post-interview calls when we were discussing terms, the hiring manager at the new job told me he "fully intended" for everyone to get the full amount of the bonus (after I expressed my concern that the language of the offer letter made one of the bonuses discretionary). I also expressed to him that I wouldn't be staying if the bonus wasn't paid up to the full amount in the offer letter.
Well, guess what happened? The discretionary bonus paid out at 80% AND the non-discretionary bonus also paid 80%. The hiring manager may have "intended" for the bonuses to pay out, but he knew the company didn't usually pay 100%.
So I called my previous manager, gave my 2 weeks and went back to my old job. Moral of the story: know your worth and watch out for variable compensation unless you know the exact terms of how it's calculated.
[removed]