epigenetics
CAGCAGCAGCAGCAGCAGCAGCAGCAGCAGCAGCAGCAGCAGCAGCAGCAGCAGCAGCAGCAGCAGCAGCAGCAGCAGCAGCAGCAGCAGCAGCAGCAGCAGCAGCAG
gln-gln-gln-gln-gln-gln-gln-gln-gln-gln-gln-gln-gln-gln-gln-gln-gln-gln-gln-gln-gln-gln-gln-gln-gln-gln-gln-gln-gln-gln-gln-gln-gln-gln
the first thing you should know about genes
is that they don’t care how many people you
invite to your wedding
or how many times you’ve almost bought tickets
to Fiji
and clicked away
to save that money, that energy
that precious, imprecise time-
for a future that has now spun away
pollen lost to the wind.
the dream is corrosive, a hemorrhage of dread
erupting from each turn of the staircase
meticulously posited in the dead volume
of a sample cup.
every ten base pairs or so,
you have to twist
shielding your telomeres with your sleeve-
an expiration date in your burning, bruised arms.
Posted Apr 25, 2022, 2:07 AM UTC · edited
The few other times that I’ve seen work about epigenetics, there seems to be an almost optimistic perspective about how our choices can change us even at a cellular level. Yet this piece seems to have the opposite point – that our choices, even while they may change the presentation of certain traits, don’t have an influence on any mechanism that really matters. The narrator seems to see genes as “uncaring” in the sense that none of our choices change the fact that our telomeres are shortening with each round of cell division (i.e., that we will die). With each breath of life that we take, each movement within the dream, we are slowly and unstoppably dying. Even when we “shield” these telomeres, we can never stop the march of our genes towards our demise. The emphasis on wedding invitations/trips to Fiji almost seemed to try to remind readers to create and/or embrace meaningful moments because our energy/time will end sooner than we think.
There were a few lines that I didn’t feel added a whole lot to clarifying or expanding on these general themes. For example, “pollen lost to the wind” didn’t feel necessary after the preceding line. The lines “Every ten base pairs or so,//you have to twist//shielding your telomeres with your sleeve-” confused me slightly since my understanding is that telomeres are only at the end of chromosomes and I’m not sure how the twists of the double helix (or “you”?) relate to that. So maybe my criticism is just that I think this poem could be more refined by asking the question of how each line and word choice relates to the overall themes you’re trying to relay to your readers. Removing or modifying lines/words to enhance communication could really make this piece shine, in my opinion.
I always love seeing “scientific” poetry, and this one was particularly fun to think about. Thanks for posting, OP!
Thank you for the excellent feedback!