Coinin

I was just looking at the titles, and I was wondering, does anyone here consider them exclusionary? They both, afaik, have rules in their sidebar against transphobia, but it seems a bit unnecessary to define womanhood and manhood in terms of genotype rather than identification if they're transfriendly.

Just curious.

Sorry if this is old news, I'm just thinking that stuff like the trashtalking takes away from our message a little. Exceptions should be made for discussing the terms themselves of course, but actually using them reflects badly on all of us. At the very least we should probably give all gendered slurs the axe (male and female).

Hey asktransgender! I just read this and I was just wondering what ye thought of it. Is this something you've ever done or could condone doing?

Probably should have posted this here to begin with. Ah well, original thread here

No replying to SRS or AgainstMensRights

They're not a group who are interested in an honest discussion. There are people out there who ID as feminists and are actually interested in discussing men's rights, wherever that may lead, but they don't come from SRS.

The best possible outcome of replying to concern trolls is that they give up and leave. The worst, is that they waste your time and possibly dominate an otherwise

No replying to SRS or AgainstMensRights

They're not a group who are interested in an honest discussion. There are people out there who ID as feminists and are actually interested in discussing men's rights, wherever that may lead, but they don't come from SRS.

The best possible outcome of replying to concern trolls is that they give up and leave. The worst, is that they waste your time and possibly dominate an otherwise useful discussion with logical fallacies and dodgy statistics. I can't really get into the head of someone who spends their free time hanging around a forum of people who