cmries

I've lost way too many hours trying to sort this out, so I'm begging you all here. I have a Vue starter app built with Webpack:

https://github.com/chaseries/vue-basic

Everything is good, everything is what I expect—except styles. They just don't work. They never get applied. I have spent ungodly hours trying to figure out why, and I still have no idea. I'm sure I'm betraying some fundamental misunderstanding about Vue or Webpack.

I know the loaders are being applied correctly because it compiles correctly and the style output is there in the dist. It just doesn't work. But when I compare it to my similar (totally functioning!) projects' configs—or those of others, or to the docs—I see n

So I'm in a pickle. I'm living in PA. I picked a name and registered the domain for a business, and I've been casually using it with clients. I really like the name, it's somewhat unique, and it suits the business perfectly. I know of no other business within my industry (domestically or otherwise) using it or even a variation of it, and I've done a little digging on this front.

What I hadn't done until tonight was look more broadly at its use in other industries. I checked in with the state tonight in advance of LLC registration, and lo and behold, there is a business—a single business—in PA with the exact same name, registered in the '70s. It's in about as far-flung an industry as possi

I'm writing a little server with websockets and I'd like some advice on testing. The functionality is actually close to that of the official example, so I'll use something akin those types:

import Data.Monoid ((<>))
import qualified Network.WebSockets as Ws

type Id = Int
type Client = (Id, Ws.Connection)
type Call = [Client]

-- Cull any stale connections of a given client and then add the fresh one
addClient :: Client -> Call -> Call
addClient client@(target, _) call = filter (\(id, _) -> target /= id) call <> [cli

Je veux dire simplement « we called him (on the telephone) ».

Je lisais Lawless French (ici, en bas de la page) et elle écrit que le verbe « appeler » prend un complément d'objet indirect, donc lui. Les exemples Collins French en revanche n'utilisent pas lui ; ils utilisent le. Qui a raison ?

From On Brûlera by Pomme:

Que la mer nous mange le corps

Que le sol nous lave le cœur

I know that definite articles tend to replace possessive adjectives when speaking about body parts, so I'm pretty sure this means

May the sea eat our bodies

May the earth wash our hearts

I guess my question is: if my translation is right, is this a common construction, or does it only apply to pronouns that include I, like je and nous? Like if I were to say "the dog bit his arm," would it be « le chien l'ai mordu le bras » ?

I hope that's clear!

Dans l'écriture et le discours informel, est-ce que on doit utiliser ne avec plus pour rendre le négatif ? Par exemple:

1. Je ne veux plus de beurre. I don't want more butter.
2. Je veux plus de beurre. I want more butter.

Is it possible that given the right context one's speaking partner would understand (2) to mean I don't want more butter? Or must one always use ne in such an ambiguous situation? Are there more such examples of this?

Bonus question: In typing this up, I realized I don't know how to modify multiple nouns with the same adjective, particularly when they're of different genders:

1. l'écriture et le discours informel
2. l'écriture et le discours informels

Is

Bonjour tout le monde. J'ai des questions sur l'usage de en, particulièrement dans ces exemples :

Tout semble faux, j'en perds mes mots

(De "Tu vas me manquer", par Maître GIMS)

En anglais, "je perds mes mots" signifie "I lose my words", non? Donc c'est quoi ici, en ? Est-ce que il dit quelque chose de plus près de "I lose them, my words"? Ou est-ce que c'est quelque chose d'autre? Is there something else going on, or does "j'en perds mes mots" mean "I lose my words" while more literally translating to something like "I lose them, my words"?

Elle n'en sort plus de ta mémoire

(De "C'est écrit", par Francis Cabrel)

Qu'est que c'est ! J'ai trouvé *[s'en sortir](http

Le lien pour l'enregistrement est ici. Merci beaucoup !

I don't know what to say to fill the pause when I'm trying to think of what to say next. In English I'd say uh, um, or like, but I have no idea what the French equivalent is. I've heard something like buh or bah and euh, but I'm not sure they fit the bill.

I'm given to understanding that the word genre can sometimes replace instances of the English colloquial like. For example il était, genre, grand would translate to he was, like, tall. Wikipedia calls this an instance of a hedge word, but in other usage it has different terminology (including discourse marker, filler, and speech disfluency).

I'm, like, lost. Um. Does anyone have any, uh, insight?

I've noticed that a lot of write-ups on French reflexive verbs are conspicuously missing the future tense. The few that I've found that hit on the future at all conjugate le futur proche without explaining why they ignore le futur simple. Even Google translate does it!

Is it just a matter of common usage? It's true that in English I'm more likely to find myself in a situation where I'd say "I'm going to get dressed" or "I'm going to shave" than "I will get dressed" or "I will shave," but I can certainly imagine scenarios where I would say the latter two. Surely there's a use case for reflexive futur simple in French as well?