imatrapper

Cops beat blacks unnecessarily

You don't need a gun for self defence

Cops FIDO

You don't need a gun for self defence

Cops use agent provocateur to kill protests

You don't need a gun for self defence

Cops target homosexuals for screwing in a public park

You don't need a gun for self defence

Cops too busy screwing young girls in their cop cars to do their jobs

You don't need a gun for self defence

Cops arrest people without cause at protests

You don't need a gun for self defence

Ok now let's go on to the gov't as a whole

Gov't mandated people being rounded up and moved to a remote area

You don't need a gun for self defence

Gov't mandates time and

For some perspective (2010 numbers since I can't seem to get newer, and yes, they are dumbed down for digestion)

15000 total homicides

6000 by hand guns

350 by rifles

And depending on the numbers you get (I used Priorities for Research to Reduce the Threat of Firearm-Related Violence, O'bammers sCDC study), there are between 108000-3000000 DGU's a year.

33000 vehicle deaths

10000 involve a drunk

Was banned for three days for "inciting violence" when I said I'd defend myself against an attacker.

We spend more than $2 million a month to protect JT. That's around 270 RCMP FTE's worth of funding. Now granted, some of this is supplies and travel, but it's a significant amount of money and effort. This staff exists to stomp out, violently any potential attack. Each of the staff involved are trained and equipped with firearms. Another perspective: nearly 3000 average Canadians pay the entirety of their tax burden for this purpose.

And yet, if we use a firearm for our defense, it's almost a guarantee that we will go to jail and be severely harmed by the process even if we're not guilty.

Has there ever been an attack on a prime minister? Because I'm pretty sure there has been on reg

If sex and gender are not the same, why do trannies work so hard at trying to make them the same through invasive surgeries, chemical treatments and costumes?

The modes at ogft banned me for mentioning that her fingering a chinaman is sinophobic.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BsEJvKSP7KQ

When the white man came here he brought with him a language and culture that wasn't shared by us. He had no interest in learning our culture or language beyond what was convenient to him

He put our children in schools removing us from our parents and depriving us of the parenting skills that come from exposure.

While he was doing that, he punished us when we tried to practice our culture and language.

Now we have a gov't who is importing people en masse who do not share our language and culture who have no interest in learning our culture or language beyond what is convenient to them.

The gov't has our children in schools, teaching them things that traditionally are taught at home. The

Those on the side of trannies know they are on the side of using violence to protect their ideology right?

I mean on the other side, is people who simply wish to stick to science, that a man is a man regardless of how he is disfigured. They do not wish to harm trannies, but at the same time, do not wish to delve in to their delusion either.

The tranny side of the argument however, has escalated to the point where if you don't validate the delusion of the mentally ill, that you deserve sanctions, and refusing those, physical violence until such time as you acquiesce. In short "think how we think or else".

How can someone be on that side and think that's a good idea?