metsmonkey

Conqueror is worded as:

"Conquerors gain attack damage and ability power, increased by 3% for each war chest opened"

In a current game, I had 6 conqueror for a base of 40% AD/AP and after opening 6 war chests, the displayed stats are showing only 47%. That means that the bonus from the war chests is multiplicative with the base increase.

40% * 1.18 = 47.2%

The power value per war chest seems incredibly low. Stacking kills for the first half of the game for a 7% increase. Having the bonus from the war chests be additive instead of multiplicative would make each individual chest more impactful for the board's power and fit the theme of the trait. Is this multiplicative scaling the i

Effective stack is CO with 104 BB

Hero in SB with AsQh

CO opens to 3bb, button call, hero call, BB call.

Flop: Ac 9d 7H

Hero X, BB x, CO bets 7.6 BB, button folds, Hero calls, BB raises to 20 BB, CO calls, Hero calls.

Turn 6d

Hero x, BB bets 22.5bb, CO calls, Hero calls.

River 3h

Everyone checks and it goes to showdown.

I tanked on the flop after the BB raise and the CO call and again on the turn, but I felt that both times i was priced into a call top pair 2nd kicker. Am I incorrect with that and it is just a fold when aggression continues on the turn?

BB Ah 9s for a flopped 2 pair CO Ad Ks for top pair top kicker

Location - New Jersey

​

I currently work for a multi-location franchise of an international company.The franchise operates as a single employer and both locations have the same district manager. The franchise is structured such that individual locations are held under different LLCs. For example, Location 1 is [Name A] enterprises and location 2 is [Name B] enterprises. Both locations have an 'owned and operated by [franchise]' sign up with the same franchise name, so the only way that the employee would even know that they are different LLCs is by checking who their paycheck comes from.

​

At the direction of the district manager, I am currently working at 2 differen

I have been running into crashes while playing World of Warcraft and was hoping someone could help me make some sense of what the error messages are saying and possibly point me in the correct direction for resolving this issue. I know just enough to do basic troubleshooting and enough to know when I am lost

​

The error message is here: https://imgur.com/TDMXqx2

The error says that it is an "Access_Violation" and makes it seem like it might be related to my RAM, so I ran the Windows Memory Diagnostic and it showed no faults.

​

My questions are mainly:

Is this error message something that is likely specific to the program that I

This is a 0.15/0.30 game.

Player in the Big blind has 176 bb available.

I am in MP with 126bb Qd10d

UTG folds, I make my standard open at the table to 3bb. It folds around to BB and they call

Pot 6.5bb

Flop: 3d9hQh

BB checks, I cbet 2bb. BB raises to 8.6bb. I call putting the pot to 24bb

Turn 4d

BB bets 17bb. I call with my top pair + flush draw. Pot now 58bb

River Kd

BB bets 52bb and I tank. I have 2nd nut flush. Ad9d, Ad2d, and Ad5d I felt could reasonably play like this and have me crushed here. I call instead of shoving the additional 46bb I have behind.

BB reveals KsQh and I take down the pot.

How was this hand played? Calling the raise on the flop was likely a mistake as th

Game: 0.05/0.10 NL 6 player table

Villain: 204bb (small blind) 3rd party: 106bb (+1) Hero: 260bb (button)

Hero delt Ah10c

UTG folds, +1 raises to 2.5bb. Folds to Hero. I call. Villain calls.

Pot 8.5bb

Flop Ad9sAs

Table checks around.

Turn 9c

Checks to Hero. Hero bets 2bb. Villain calls. +1 folds

Pot 12.5 bb

River Ac

Villain bets 6bb. Hero raises to 21bb. Villain reraises to 36bb. Hero shoves and gets called.

Villain reveals 9h9d

4 of a kind 9s bested by 4 of a kind aces.

###Build Help/Ready:

This is going to be my first build in a while and I just wanted to make sure that I wasn't overlooking something super silly. I already have an OS and hard drives.

The goal is to be able to play star citizen and cyberpunk reasonably well as well as maintain performance for the next 3-5 years

Thanks in advance

PCPartPicker Part List

Type	Item	Price
CPU	AMD Ryzen 7 3700X 3.6 GHz 8-Core Processor	$279.99 @ Amazon
CPU Cooler	[be quiet! Dark Rock Pro 4 50.5 CFM CPU Cooler](https://pcpartpicker.com/

Is this ammunition actually subsonic/quieter in game? If it is, would the suppressor even be needed? A 3 slot mp7 is a lot easier to stash away than a 4 slot one.

I loaded up an offline game and the subsonic sounded the same so the AP round both with and without a suppressor on the weapon. Was this just a sound bug on my end and the other players in game hear different audio for the separate rounds?

My guild was having some... less than Ideal performance regarding the marks and finding partners. Is there an easy way in WCL to find out which two people collided to cause the Grand Trine?

This view shows one of the 2 people involved, but is there a way to find it without having to look through each replay to that exact moment?

No one can give you a definitive answer.

Check for yourself on PTR. Nothing is final yet and things are consistently changing. The full patch is rumored to be going live next week, so there is still plenty of time for more adjustments. If you are worried that [spec 1] is going to be worse than [spec 2], make sure that both are at 35 talents and start banking up your AP tokens for after the patch goes live.

Whenever an article comes out like BBD's Is Modern really a turn-4 format, people always start discussing various Ban list decisions. Whether it is Seething song, summer bloom (cited for breaking the 'turn 4 rule'), twin ('limiting diversity'), or pod ('restricting design space'), everyone always has an opinion as to what should and should not be allowed in the format.

As a group that focuses on competitive decks and what gives the strongest chance of winning, I would think that r/spikes would be a lot better at judging the overall power level of cards/archetypes. If you were in control of the ban list, what changes would

I want to address the boogyman that is Fire Mage and talk about where it currently sits and the changes that are currently on the PTR.

Note: All of the Warcraft Logs data that I will link to will be Mythic kills, 75%. I feel like this is a good representation of people who know their class, execute mechanics, and put up solid numbers. It also excludes people who were super lucky with either double BiS legendaries and with procs in the fight itself. This should be the type of data which is considered when making balance changes.

From what I have gathered, people seem to think that Fire mages are complete monsters destroying all PvE content that they see. This is not true. If you look at the