r/pics•
MaybeComputer

They shit their pants so I don't have to.

They shit their pants so I don't have to.

Posted Nov 12, 2010, 12:28 AM UTC

1.3K752

They shit their pants so you don't have to scheiss in deinen hosen.

320
Volksgrenadier•

I would say that the D-Day landings' success meant that Europe would be free to not speak Russian, rather than German.

/history nerd.

125
Lard_Baron•

I think extract below puts the Western front in context.

On the Western fronts, in any case, the losses were relatively minor, a few hundred thousand here or there at most. My starting figures will be somewhat arbitrary: I have no choice, since no one agrees on them. For the total Soviet losses, I’ll stick to the traditional number, the twenty million cited by Khrushchev in 1956, while noting that Reitlinger, a respected British author, finds only some twelve million, whereas Erickson, a Scottish scholar who’s just as reputable if not more so, comes to a minimum figure of twenty-six million; thus the official Soviet number neatly splits the difference, give or take a million. As for the German losses – in the East alone, that is – one can take as a starting point the even more official and Germanically precise number of 6,172,373 casualties between June 22, 1941, and March 31, 1945, a figure compiled in an internal report of the OKH (the Army High Command) that surfaced after the war, but one that includes both the dead (more than a million), the wounded (almost four million), and the missing (i.e., dead plus prisoners plus dead prisoners, some 1,288,000 men). So let us say for the sake of simplicity two million dead, since the wounded don’t concern us here, including, thrown in for good measure, the additional fifty thousand or so men killed between April 1 and May 8, 1945, mainly in Berlin, to which we still have to add the roughly one million civilians believed to have died during the invasion of eastern Germany and the subsequent population movements, giving us, let’s say, a grand total of three million German dead. As for the Jews, you have a choice: the traditional number, even though few people know where it comes from, is six million (it was Höttl who said at Nuremberg that Eichmann had told him this; but Wisliceny asserted that Eichmann had said five million to his colleagues; and Eichmann himself, when the Jews finally got to ask him the question in person, said somewhere between five and six million, but probably closer to five). Dr. Korherr, who compiled statistics for the Reichsführer-SS Heinrich Himmler, totaled up close to two million as of December 31, 1942, but acknowledged, when I discussed the matter with him in 1943, that his baseline figures were unreliable. Finally, the highly respected professor Raul Hilberg, a specialist in the matter and one who can hardly be suspected of holding a partisan stance, at least not in favor of the Germans, reaches, after a dense, nineteen-page demonstration, a final count of 5,100,000, which more or less corresponds to the opinion of the late Obersturmbannführer Eichmann. So let’s settle for Professor Hilberg’s figure, which gives us, to summarize:

Soviet dead. . . . . . . . . . . 20 million
German dead . . . . . . . . . 3 million
Subtotal (for the Eastern Front). . 23 million
Endlösung. . . . . . . . . . . . 5.1 million
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26.6 million, given that 1.5 million Jews have also been counted as Soviet dead (“Soviet citizens murdered by the German-Fascist invaders,” as the extraordinary monument in Kiev so discreetly puts it)

Now for the math. The conflict with the USSR lasted from June 22, 1941, at 03:00, until, officially, May 8, 1945, at 23:01, which adds up to 3 years, 10 months, 16 days, 20 hours, and 1 minute, or, rounding off, to 46.5 months, 202.42 weeks, 1,417 days, 34,004 hours, or 2,040,241 minutes (counting the extra minute). For the program known as the “Final Solution,” we’ll use the same dates; before that, nothing had yet been decided or systematized, so Jewish casualties were for the most part incidental. Now let’s average out one set of figures with the other: for the Germans, this gives us 64,516 dead per month, or 14,821 dead per week, or 2,117 dead per day, or 88 dead per hour, or 1.47 dead per minute, on average for every minute of every hour of every day of every week of every month of every year for 3 years, 10 months, 16 days, 20 hours, and 1 minute. For the Jews, including the Soviet ones, we have about 109,677 dead per month, which is 25,195 dead per week, 3,599 dead per day, 150 dead per hour, or 2.5 dead per minute, over the same period. Finally, on the Soviet side, that gives us some 430,108 dead per month, 98,804 dead per week, 14,114 dead per day, 588 dead per hour, or 9.8 dead per minute, for the same period. Thus for the overall total in my field of activities we have an average of 572,043 dead per month, 131,410 dead per week, 18,772 dead per day, 782 dead per hour, and 13.04 dead per minute, every minute of every hour of every day of every week of every month of every year of the given period, which is, as you will recall, 3 years, 10 months, 16 days, 20 hours, and 1 minute

Taken from this

78
ruzkin•

Jesus Christ. Thankyou for this post, I never thought about the losses in those terms before.

8
Lard_Baron•

Jesus Christ.

That chapter continues:

Let those who smirked at that admittedly somewhat pedantic extra minute please consider that it is worth an additional 13.04 dead, on average, and imagine, if they can, thirteen people from their circle of friends killed in one minute. You can also calculate the length of time it takes to generate a fresh corpse: this gives us on average a dead German every 40.8 seconds, a dead Jew every 24 seconds, and a dead Bolshevik (Soviet Jews included) every 6.12 seconds, or on the whole a new dead body on average every 4.6 seconds, for the entirety of said period. You are now in a position to carry out, based on these numbers, concrete exercises of imagination. For example, stopwatch in hand, count off one death, two deaths, three deaths, etc., every 4.6 seconds (or every 6.12 seconds, or every 24 seconds, or every 40.8 seconds, if you have a marked preference), while trying to picture them lying there in front of you, those one, two, three dead. You’ll find it’s a good meditation exercise. Or take some more recent catastrophe that affected you strongly, and compare the two. For instance, if you are an American, consider your little Vietnam adventure, which so traumatized your fellow citizens. You lost 50,000 troops there in ten years: that’s the equivalent of a little less than three days and two hours’ worth of dead on the Eastern Front, or of some thirteen days, twenty-one hours, and twenty-five minutes’ worth of dead Jews.

1
avalonhill•

I believe the soviet number for casualties was derived from two census numbers. There was a census taken in Russia in the 1930's then another in the late 40's or early 50's. There was about a 20 million person decline in the numbers.

Now considering many of those people died outside the time frame, the number of dead per minute drops substantially. Also, no one was having babies at that time, so who knows how much of the loss was due to natural attrition. Also, records were very poor.

My 2 cents

3
Chester_b•

German dead . . . . . . . . . 3 million

3 million? WTF? German military casualties counts about 5.5 million. Where did you take number 3 from?

0
Lard_Baron•

Casualties include wounded.

It's shown how it is obtained above. Starts here.

As for the German losses – in the East alone, that is – one can take as a starting point the even more official and Germanically precise number of 6,172,373 casualties between June 22, 1941, and March 31, 1945, a figure compiled in an internal report of the OKH (the Army High Command)

5
[deleted]•

[deleted]

-4
DriftingJesus•

Don't mistake loses due to a failure in logistics and military planning for something that they are not.

Don't belittle the sacrifice of those which lost their lives on the western fronts because the casualties were not as great.

-5
zaferk•

Your point?

2
[deleted]•

[deleted]

-7
na85•

I think most people who look at those figures and seem to think "yeah, the russians had shitty tactics, all they did was rush with no weapons" are missing something.

I don't think Stalin said to himself "Ha ha, I'll purposely under-equip my armed forces so a whole bunch of them die!"

Most of Soviet industry was in the west, and when the Germans invaded they had to relocate almost all of it. Imagine fighting a rapidly-mechanizing conflict the scale of WW2 with no industry backing your troops, and then look at the staggering Soviet losses with new perspective.

22

Well, there are other reasons too. For example, Russian POWs were just left in the field to die. No food, no clothing, no heating. Like 3 to 5 millions of POWs just died in captivity.

Wiki: Nazi crimes against Soviet POWs

2
dotwaffle•

I think it's more heroic. I choose to remember those who were conscripted into warfare - those that didn't want to go and had no choice whether they could or could not.

You hear stories of WW1 where you were forced to walk over no-mans land as running "wasn't civilised" and wave after wave of people were sent knowing that the ever-present machine gun made the chances of success practically zero, and the benefits little.

You then hear stories of the Eastern Front in WW2, how Russians were sent out to fight not only without the proper equipment, but also sometimes without even basic training.

Someone who joins the Armed Forces has made that choice, and we should make sure he/she has everything they need to perform to the utmost best of their ability without putting them in too much danger. Someone who is conscripted and then put in situations where they're treated like cannon fodder deserve my (and everyone else's) respect. Remembrance Day isn't just about those who fought, it's about remembering the terrible things that have happened in the past, and to learn from our past mistakes.

1
Wibbles•

It's very unlikely that Russia would have been able to single-handedly push Germany out of every occupied territory in Europe and stifle local resistance afterwards.

23
HiveMined•

Russia would have steamrolled Germany into the ground with or without the Atlantic front. And keep in mind they stole all the atomic information they had, the US/UK didn't share it with them - they would have had the bomb, too. Local resistance afterwards might have been a different thing, but keep in mind in a lot of Western European nations had large and active Communist populations. Czechoslovakia, for example, had it's Republican govt. overthrown by elected communists within a few years of the end of the war.

26
hoodatninja•

See the problem here is that this is all speculative history. You can't actually prove what would or would not have happend. Russia, while finally launching a successful counter-attack, was severely aided by the fact that over a dozen divisions of the German Army were occupied doing AA work against Allied bombing (mostly by the US), not to mention much of their military was diverted to prepare for an allied invasion.

IF the US had not gotten involved then England would have pulled out earlier, the bombing runs in Germany and their conquered territories would not have occurred, and Russia would have had a much nastier foe on their hands. This is an equally valid argument when compared to your theory, if not more sound (sorry if I sound condescending). Russia was running out of able-bodied men: if you look at their draft statistics, by 1942 they were drafting older and older citizens. They were far from able to definitively stop Germany. Maybe they would have won, but steam-roll isn't even close. Stalin's statistics and statements about the size/might of the Russian army were pure fabrication.

tl;dr: Shit got real when the US joined up, if for no other reason than the strategic bombing campaign/threat of invasion. Russia was not prepared to "steamroll." I am a history major whose focus is Russian history and believe me I have a lot of admiration for the Russians...but I just can not side with you on this. Russia was critical in the allied victory, but they could not have done it alone, just like the US would have possibly lost had it not been for the Russian army taking on >70% of the German army

Edit: Clarity/grammar error

14
shustrik•

Um, actually the US/UK also got most of the info on the nukes from the Germans. So You might say both sides "stole" it from Hitler.

EDIT: sorry guys, mixed up nuclear weapons with ICBMs. The US used German scientists to develop intercontinental missile part, not the payload.

10
nikdahl•

In regards to Germany getting the bomb, [this article] is damn interesting.

1
Vercingetorixxx•

I can't agree with this. In my view, Germany would have been able to win the eastern front if they hadn't had to divert forces to fight US troops. In addition, US industry, funding, and loans kept the Allies in the fight where they would have been crushed.

Even if the Soviet Union would have been able to defeat Germany, which is definitely a possibility, it would have been a long, dragged out affair that wouldn't have been resolved in the 1940s.

0
Moridyn•

I prefer to believe that Russia at that time was so utterly badass that, had they so chosen, they could have kicked Germany to the curb and then kept right on marching all the way to London. Then turned around and smacked China into Australia, nuked Japan again just for the hell of it, blown up Pearl Harbor again, then lit a cigar and said, "In Soviet Russia, we kick your ass."

6
sarahfailin•

they did push nazis out single-handedly. when rednecks arrived, nazis were already on the run.

-1
MLBM100•

Unikely, but not impossible. This might make you think differently.

-5
ChingShih•

Most of that is just disproving conspiracy theories (the last three) and correcting for nationalism on both sides of the Atlantic (regarding points 1 and 2). There were a multitude of reasons why no one country would have been able to effective defeat the Axis*, but none of them were discussed in that terrible link.

* Even with atomic bombs there is no guarantee that the German army would have been sufficiently crushed.

Unlike the Russians, atomic bombs might not have been a compelling force in getting the Germans to surrender.

8
[deleted]•

[deleted]

4
[deleted]•

Fucking Melvin.

16
llehsadam•

Nah, I'm sure native languages would prevail.

2
Nemo84•

There is little to no proof the Nazis would have held on to their Western European conquests if they had won the war. And it is doubtful Stalin would have advanced through Western Europe unless the Western Allies would have been totally obliterated already. So it's more likely neither Allied nor Russian troops would have changed the languages spoken in Western Europe.

/another history nerd

2
sarahfailin•

d-day landing meant that americans would get to share brits' and soviets' victory spoils, even though americans did absolutely nothing in ww2.

2
Volksgrenadier•

What "victory spoils" would the British have gotten in World War II without D-Day? Furthermore, what "victory spoils" DID the British get from WWII? I would say that Britain, France, the Netherlands, etc. were, in the long run, some of the biggest losers of the war.

0
[deleted]•

/history nerd.

A real history nerd wouldn't be using logical fallacies to make a "point."

2
Volksgrenadier•

I was merely offering an opinion.

1
bjallemon•

Yeah, that's at least true for us from Finland and most of the Baltic countries.

/Finn

1
sarahfailin•

the countries sympathetic to nazis that is.

2
TheTilde•

This. Us the west are so uneducated (should I say brain-washed?) on this subject.

1
vivakyuss•

'Scheiße in deiner Hose'.

how appropriate; german grammar nazi here. ;)

35
lubosz•

They shit their pants, "so dass du nicht in deine Hosen scheißen musst."

German grammar Nazi, with correct grammar here. 'Scheiße in deiner Hose', means "Shit in your pants". "Shit in your pants!" (as an imperative), means "Scheiße in deine Hose!"

16
[deleted]•

I love how this got upvoted strongly whereas the other guy who offered a translation was downvoted for being a dick, even though all vivakyuss did was run "shit in your pants" through a translator, and sinews actually provided the correct German.

3
vivakyuss•

I don't need a translator, I was born in germany. ;)

1
jtp8736•

It's because the guy you linked to came across as a douchebag and that is discouraged.

1
edubation•

how appropriate; german grammar nazi here. ;)

And this is how it begins.

0
Xirkander•

This is for you. But I'm sure the grammar is incorrect. ;)

0
vivakyuss•

vielen dank, werter herr; aber ich glaube, sie irren sich.

1
Xirkander•

Aber es komt von den Google Translationsabteilung. Es kan nicht falsh sein.

2
Nukleon•

You know, IIRC, the ß has actually been removed from official dictionaries, but people still use it.

-1
derwisch•

You don't remember correctly.

5
Nukleon•

You don't just replace all street signs

1
nebbish•

I always say, having to speak German would be the least of our problems

4
[deleted]•

Nothing personal against you but for fuck's sake, there are several comments that deserve more votes than this one.

YOU DON'T HAVE TO UPVOTE HIM JUST BECAUSE HE IS WHO HE IS. THIS IS RIDICULOUS.

2
miller_time•

Reminds me of that movie Stalingrad.

1
Ooboga•

I'm sorry, but that toilet paper I see hasn't been used.

1
[deleted]•

[deleted]

0
sinews•

…so you dir nicht in die Hose machen musst.

Fixed that for you, and remember: if you don't know shit about German syntax, just don't.

-2
AndyJarosz•

Hey guys, a GRAMMAR NAZI!

49
flynnfx•

No, a grammar nazi nazi !

2
sinews•

Yup. Pandering to the memeheads equals reaping Karma like old spice commercials.

Just to clarify: ever thought about how broken English is trashed in places like these? But when it comes to foreign, i.e. all other languages it's just fine to assert your trivial S-P-O word order. Downboat ahead.

1
[deleted]•

U-boat ahead.

FTFY

5
Wibbles•

People are corrected for fucking up English when it's their first language, most people here don't speak German as their first and it's possible to correct grammar/syntax without saying "HAHA YOU SUCK DON'T BOTHER LEARNING ANYTHING EVER".

3
third-eye•

Ganz recht mein Herr. Apparently it's only ok to make mistakes if you're not writing in English. But beware if you use an apostrophe too much.

2
hookedupphat•

You corrected someones German and he called you a grammer nazi

Get it now?

1
frugal_masturbater•

Keine Angst, wir werden Dich verteidigen. Boot auf!

1
[deleted]•

[deleted]

1
Frankeh•

if you don't know shit about German syntax, just don't.

That's what I always say! If you don't know something, don't even try!

Fuck trying and FUCK YEAR!

1
tip_ty•

Ugh shut up.

-1
Phantom_Scarecrow•

Great-Uncle Denver was in there, somewhere. A funny Pennsylvania farmer who made stained-glass suncatchers as a hobby. Was lucky enough to live to be 94.
His brother, my grandfather, was a Captain, stationed in Hawaii. He was assigned to Bomb Disposal. When he came home, he was never the same, and would never speak of his service. Everyone assumed he had "Shell Shock" from being on bomb disposal, where your lifespan is measured in hours. It wasn't until after he died that my dad realised, he was a CAPTAIN- he wasn't disposing of the bombs, he was looking at the list of his men and deciding which ones would die that day. For the next 60 years, those men marched through his dreams, asking, "Why me?"
Not all war wounds are visible. Thank you, Grandpa and Uncle Denver.

299
keikun17•

;_;

29
brokenseattle•

Former US Navy here. Render hand salute

Your Grandfather and your Uncle Denver are both heroes.

22
Phantom_Scarecrow•

My father-in-law was USN, joined at 17. Was in the Pacific for the last year or so of WWII (USS Wildcat), then was in Kwajalein for the atomic tests. He's said many times that the Prinz Eugen was the most beautiful ship he'd ever seen.

1
[deleted]•

Did he describe those feelings to you? or bottle em in as most do.

6
[deleted]•

[deleted]

5
[deleted]•

I'm sorry. There is a stigma attached to Men having and expressing feelings, despite the fact it helps. That is unfortunately what ends up happening to the majority of vets who saw combat.

1
Phantom_Scarecrow•

Bottled. Tightly. He was a sweet, kind, caring man who loved his family, and acted as if he had never been to war. He never spoke of it to any of us, and would quietly avoid anything (TV shows, books, events) that might spark his memories.

1
Psandor•

I can't even imagine having to do that, that's nuts.

5
BrewN1nja•

When I stood on the beaches of Normandy near the water, then looked up to the area where the cover would have been, it really hit me what they had to do. We are talking a good 100 yards of nothing but squishy sand, while "Hitlers Buzzsaws" were firing all around you. It really put into perspective what these guys were asked to do, and they did without second thought because "it was the right thing to do." Thats also why today I honor them by flying them to see the WWII memorial in DC. I helped form our local Honor Flight hub, and am currently a board member today. Every single one of the vets I talk to says they would do it again, and that they just did what had to be done. Amazing people.

2
mrmyxlplyx•

I wish I could do that today at my regular job. I wouldn't have a hard time picking who went and who didn't.

I can say that in jest because I've BTDT. (Desert Storm veteran).

1
LogicProfessor•

Was Denver a nickname he was given? Kudos to you and your family for defending this nation.

2
Phantom_Scarecrow•

No, that was his real name. His siblings included a Ruth, a Rolland, and a Sigourney, though.

1
puhnitor•

Thank you to your Great-Uncle Denver for his work and sacrifice. I can't even imagine how hard it must have been to send men to their deaths. And I agree with George Carlin that it should still be called Shell Shock

1
wcoenen•

The "shell-shocked" condition was first given that name because it was believed to be caused by the effect of explosion shock waves on the nervous system. It seems only logical that the name was changed once people understood it better.

3
orangepotion•

Have you seen Kurosawa Dreams?

1
Phantom_Scarecrow•

No, but the description of "The Tunnel" sounds accurate.

2
meanpeoplesuck•

Your Grandfather and your Uncle Denver are both heroes.

1
[deleted]•

[deleted]

1
EtchSketch•

That's photoshopped, I can tell by the pixels.
Also, I happen to have the original picture. No wonder they shat their pants.

185
third-eye•

Obviously shopped as well. Experts agree that this is the original picture.

92
[deleted]•

oh my god. that's terrifying.

there is no stopping an army like that.

13
BigDawgWTF•

Well done.

1
[deleted]•

[deleted]

1
MaybeComputerOP•

I was actually a little worried there, cause I wouldn't want to have put something out there like this that was totally fake. But then I clicked the link and all was well. :D

40
[deleted]•

[deleted]

2
[deleted]•

I don't think all is well. I know this is the internet and all. Getting offended and pissed is pretty pointless but making light of the heroism these guys went though is a douche move, especially today.

I don't think the original post or picture intended to do that but the Photoshopped picture totally does.

RIP Grandpa. Thanks for fighting in WW2 so EtchSketch has the freedom to make fun of you.

-12
MisterMeat•

Both of my grandfathers fought in WW2. One lost both his legs when his tank was blown up in Holland. The other was a navigator on B-24 bombers on raids over Burma, dude navigated with through enemy fire and heavy cloud banks with basically a slide rule and a protractor. I get that EtchSketch is sort of poking fun at the picture. However when I looked at I saw a picture that of something from my childhood that was scary-as-shit when I first saw it. Saving Private Ryan certainly made this scene scary for me as an adult but generally I think we are pretty desensitized to a shot like the original. Yes there were no AT-ATs on D-day, but for a bunch of kids who grew up on farms who had never watched TV there might as well have been. Anyway, I get why it insulted you, it just reminded me of how brave these guys really were.

15
[deleted]•

That is an interesting perspective. Thanks for sharing.

12
TheThirdBlackGuy•

In all fairness, the freedom to make fun of someone was never an issue of contention in any war I've ever studied. I absolutely hate the overextension of what soldiers died for to trivial things such as this.

I'm not making a personal attack on you, for all I know you were joking, but the line has to be drawn somewhere.

11
[deleted]•

[deleted]

8
2ndAccount4Trolling•

I actually think he's honoring them by posting whatever he wants, no matter what other people might think of it. He's using his freedom, and sure, this could be offensive to you and piss you off, but I guarantee, everything in the world from sex to cute little puppies will offend someone somewhere. So if you think it's funny - fuck everybody else and just do it.

Oh, and I just made this account (notice the username?) it's so that I can say whatever the fuck I want without worrying about downvotes from now on.

3
[deleted]•

Good advice vis-a-vis account name but "fuck everybody else and just do it" is a little irresponsible. We owe it to ourselves and those around us (even online) to be decent.

1
porn_flakes•

And they fucking won....

6
moskaudancer•

That's not the original, this is.

5
cjnkns•

That's great. I had to share that on FB! :) thanks.

3
[deleted]•

[deleted]

5
zekkerjah•
2
codysattva•

maybe some other day that's funny, but kinda not so much today.

-1
[deleted]•

[deleted]

1
[deleted]•

you win at life

2
Chody•

I got one hell of a chuckle out of that.

2
flibitboat•

even if it is photo shopped, those mother fuckers were brave and bad ass and I will NEVER forget what they did for us. It always brings tears to my eyes to think about how courageous they were. I wish I could have shook each of their hands and said thank you before they got of that boat to fight for freedom. Hats off to you guys, hope to see you in heaven where you belong :)

1
baconcatman•

What do you mean for us? Those were soldiers from a galaxy far, far away.

Did you even look at the picture?

5
Alexybob•

Hey, they didn't all die.

3
dinsy06•

love it!!

1
NightOnTheSun•

Actually, they shit their pants so I can have the freedom to choose whether I want to shit my pants.

140
trollpimp•

I respect these men more than I can express on any computer. They witnessed countless friends succumb to the machine gun fire and artillery they were under but pressed on. Men as young as I am, 18. Drafted with very little training they fought for a cause. What I believe was the last just cause our country has fought for. Against tyranny and genocide. Even with these just causes I don't know if I could find the bravery to pull off what they did. Happy Veteran's Day to anyone who has fought with more bravery than I could ever muster.

110
[deleted]•

If you want to appreciate what you have, look beyond the states in that war. For every US soldier that died fighting in WW2, there were roughly 30 from the Soviet Union.

44
ribosometronome•

You don't think liberating Kuwait was just? What about protecting South Korea from North Korean invaders? Do you honestly think the world would be a better place if we had let North Korea conquer them?

-3
[deleted]•

Yeah, and that one where we saved all those kids in Sudan and Darfur.

4
neoumlaut•

Absolutely not.

1
[deleted]•

[deleted]

1
[deleted]•

Nope. Nope. And it didn't change anything.

-2
SoFisticate•

Sounds like we did good, then. Go to hell.

-5
JudgeHolden•

This is a very tired point that's basically been beaten to death on Reddit. Can't we just have a fucking Veteran's Day and appreciate our guys and not turn it into a sanctimonious history lesson?

-15
HiveMined•

Rememberence days are supposed to be a sanctimonious history lessons, it's about remembering those who died and why, so that theoretically, we don't end up in the same shit all over again. They are not meant to be days of national boner stroking.

30
Strangeweirdo•

Sometimes, a history lesson is why I click on the comments. I want to know the context of certain situations rather than remain happily oblivious to the things that happened in the background.

28
ceekly•

and appreciate our guys

because you know those other guys (Britain, Soviet Union), our allies, fuck those guys.

3
[deleted]•

Are you saying you should celebrate Veteran's Day without the history?

3
[deleted]•

Great. Another loudmouth American with no patience for history.

3
[deleted]•

Yeah, I remember this happening everywhere in Veteran's Day 2008.

before you and i had accounts
1
signallost•

I have incredible respect for the soldiers who fought, even though I am against war as a whole and have far less respect for those politicians who so carelessly have made the decision to go to war throughout history. For those who lived, for those who died, for those that lived but will never be the same again as when they left.

I also have respect for those left at home, every day hearing a knock at the door or a phone ringing, and desperately hoping "please, PLEASE don't let that be about my child/husband."

For those that did not fight, but were caught up in the battle as civilians and victims of the war, and those that fought the war at home.

Even for those of the opposing side, who were simply people like anyone else, mothers, fathers, children, brothers, sisters, who may have simply wanted to fight for their country or had no choice.

Everyone loses something in a war. I'd like to hope they're all remembered.

8
Monsieur_Flotini•

You echo my sentiment perfectly. Thankyou.

1
zz101•

I think the knock at the door is a relatively recent thing. In earlier days it was just a telegram.

1
[deleted]•

I think I'm going to put in my will that I'd like every male bachelor I know to receive the news of my death in the form of a strip-o-gram. They'll get telegram placard when the lap dance is over.

^ Genius idea I just had.

1
signallost•

It was usually delivered via the local cab companies though, and since it was from the army they had to knock on the door to make sure it was the right family.

EDIT: Not in all places, but some did get the knock or the cab delivery. Either way, any note or call saying your loved one was shot or blown to pieces sucks. Just knowing they're over there and could die at any moment is more what I was getting at.

1
kaosjester•

When I was playing through Call of Duty 2, I played the level with the U.S. Rangers climbing the cliff faces. At the end of that level they play a speech by the president describing the bravery of those men, and it hit me: they did that. The U.S. Rangers landed on a cliff face out of boats and climbed up the fucking wall on ropes while nazis shot down at them. I almost cried.

4
karnage42•

Keep in mind, some (like my grandpa) enlisted as young as 17yo.

1
edubation•

I heard some as young as 14/15.

1
unfortunate_ermine•

I agree. After WWII we just fought wars to get money.

1
thinkinofaname•

You need more upvotes.

-2
socratessue•

Yes. Makes me want to cry; for them, for their parents, for their unborn children. Best and the brightest, and all that shit.

Damn, what a downer. Sorry.

0
givecake•

Surely the guys were brave, but the guys that sent them to their deaths.. War is about profit, and lives are dispensable.

-2
trollpimp•

You can't say WWII was about profit. There were no war industries then. We turned regular factories into war factories. Not until after was there a permanent defense industry (which many say has been an encouragement to go to war, and I don't disagree). It was about freedom from tyranny and defense of the weak. Hitler had to be stopped.

3
givecake•

How did Hitler get the cash for his campaign in the first place?

1
The_Decoy•

So...did you do it?

20
xtrumpclimbs•

But... They don't even know what they've been doing in Afghanistan and Iraq. How smart is that?

3
The_Decoy•

That is the failing of the political/military leaders. Not the soldiers in the field.

0
xtrumpclimbs•

No soldiers = No war

2
silent_p•

The freedom to choose whose pants to shit, and when!

3
IPoopedMyPants•

I'm glad someone pointed this out. Some people choose to shit their pants.

2
righthereonthisrock•

That's kind of redundant logic. "Don't have to" != "have to not".

1
IPoopedMyPants•

I know they are not equivalent. I simply stated that I was glad someone made the distinction.

1
hoard•

The Nazi's won't let you shit your pants!?

2
xwonka•

It's a freedom I exercise every single day.

1
Richeh•

I don't shit in your pants but I will fight for the death for the right to.

1
[deleted]•

[deleted]

0
[deleted]•

Actually, French people are very annoying. Bread is bread. Just because you make it in France doesn't mean it's French bread and the rest of us should have to call it such. Get over yourselves. I just baked a loaf of American bread.

0
dmajoraddnine•

Came to basically say this.

-4
TheContrarian2•

My dad was in the Big Red One (US 1st Infantry) and Landed at Ohama Beach on D-Day. I'm now 46 and wonder back on the day my dad had to jump out of the amphibious landing craft. I really didn't 'get it' until I saw Saving Private Ryan. I know, that wasn't a documentary, but many war age men proclaimed that it was a realistic portrayal of the landing.

I think WW2 was our last justifiable war. To the men that fought in Korea, Vietnam, Panama, Iraq and everywhere else, I mean this comment as no slight. You go where your ordered to go and for that I honor you. I just wish our political leadership honored your lives in a similar way.

90
nick_arsen•

There was actually a spike in PTSD cases after many D-Day vets watched this film. Apparently it was one of the first films to also feature incoming fire and that was enough to bring back former stresses.
Great movie.

49
etherreal•

Brought my dad to tears in the theater. That's saying a lot.

30
[deleted]•

[deleted]

41
francohab•

I imagined the scene and I instantly had tears in my eyes...

11
dimensional_dan•

It was a shite movie, however the first 15 minutes were truly awesome in the true sense of the word. It's a pity the movie became a comic book fantasy after the oh so brutal introduction. Could have been a great movie.

-7
[deleted]•

You're going to need more to backup your argument after a claim like that.

3
dimensional_dan•

Well, it's an opinion, but... the first fifteen minutes, the d-day opening were some of the most gut wrenching scenes ever put to film. It was real "horror of war" material. Then the whole war is hell theme and ultra realism seems to be lost after the movie turns into a comic book adventure of a bunch of soldiers taking on the German army single handedly in order to save one guy for his mama. Then when it looks like the few soldiers are going to be overrun, they are saved by the cavalry.

Saving Private Ryan would have been so much more interesting if they had simply followed a real combat unit through the first days of D-day. The rescue fantasy had the effect of pulling me out of the awe inspiring introduction and reminding me that what I was watching was in fact, just an American fantasy.

2
[deleted]•

Korea was actually pretty justified. However, MacArthur kind of fucked that one up.

13
brokenseattle•

Mac A also got his ass fired. Brilliant tactician or not, you don't tell the President of the United States to go piss up a rope. That's just not a good career move.

3
Moridyn•

It was?

1
[deleted]•

I'm not exactly fresh on the details but the Soviet sympathizers attacked the south and as such the US and other countries were defending an attacked nation. I'm also pretty sure that most South Koreans are still pretty happy that they're not* living under Kim Jong Il at the moment. Then again had the Allies lost Korea, they would all be blaming the US for their misery. At the moment only North Korea is doing that. The wars after Korea are a more dubious issue. I guess Vietnam had some parallels and it's possible that had the US won, it would've been seen as a justified war.

5
stunt_penguin•

War does not decide who is right, only who is left.

4
Moridyn•

Well yeah, but why did we need to intervene? I thought we only did it to fight communism.

0
nikdahl•

So was the Desert Storm for the most past.

1
DesCo83•

Ah the Big Red One. It's been 5 years, and I can still sing every word of the Bro song.

Toast of the Army, favorite son...

4
dtwhitecp•

Was he alive to see Saving Private Ryan?

I have read a lot about how WW2 changed the scope of war forever-- basically back then it was a (relatively) extremely clear-cut good vs. evil that we will likely never see again. A lot of men that served in WW2 had major problems integrating back into normal life because it didn't compare to the clearly defined struggle. There's a movie about that but I can't remember the name of it.

1
TheContrarian2•

He was not. He passed away from a stroke in the early 80s.

He never spoke about the experience, except for one time, when I was able to 'interview' him for a history project. He talked about it to me frankly then, but spared me the gory details because I was only 11 or so.

Here's an interesting story: He related his most scary story to me and it wasn't the landing at Normandy. It was at the end of the war when things were being mopped up. He got caught behind Russian lines as he was scavenging for food for his platoon. At that time, there were many military leaders that wanted to continue the war and start fighting against Russia. I think all sides knew it, so he was worried when he got caught.

Thankfully, they just let him go.

1
[deleted]•

You go where your ordered to go and for that I honor you.

There is nothing honorable about that.

-9
jay76•

I agree with sioh. There wasn't neccesarily any honour in doing what you were ordered to do.

But the sheer amount of bravery is incredible. I am grateful for that, and while I doubt I'll ever have the opportunity/need to prove myself in a similar situation, this will always be one of my ultimate measures of what it is to be a brave person.

0
kefex•

You go where your ordered to go and for that I honor you.

I honour those who refused.

-11
supraspinatus•

I have always been fascinated with this Capa picture from Omaha Beach. The officer on the left (white vertical stripe on back of helmet) thinking "Jesus this is a cluster fuck." the dude with the May West hanging off his belt (middle center,) the fella who thought enough to wrap his M-1 Garand in plastic on the far right. It's just surreal to me. I wonder what happened to those fellas.

46
MaybeComputerOP•

For a while, this was my desktop background. I would look at it every day to remind me that, no matter how badly things were going or how good they were going, it was only because these men went through hell and back to make it so.

29
etherreal•
11
stay_away•

As much as people seem to like that picture, I think the thought of "harden the fuck up" is conveyed in a more meaningful manner if the text wasn't there.

21
brokenseattle•

I just keep thinking about the Chopper Read skit. Harden the fuck up

2
drknight•

That's been mine for a while.

1
[deleted]•

Mine too :)

1
quipitrealgood•

I did the same, except it reminded me every day not to bitch when times got rough, because I'd never be in a situation as shitty as the one these guys went through.

1
VulturE•
1
okayplayer•

That seems a bit gratuitous.

0
[deleted]•

The overall landings at Omaha suffered 10% casulties (5000 out of 50000 men), but the first wave would have been much higher at around 50% casulties. So chances are close to half that they either died on the beach or got hit badly.

Either way, it shows us how much guts it took to get off that boat and run up those beaches, knowing that you had less than 50% of getting out of there unharmed.

14
EgonYourMucus•

Never tell me the odds!

17
RommelTJ•

I can't remember what this is referencing. Care to remind me?

Edit: Wait, is it Firefly?

4
rcbizz72•

Han Solo from Star Wars, I think episode V?

7
HostisHumaniGeneris•

I was going to just tell you, but linking you here will be much more vindictive:

http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/NeverTellMeTheOdds

3
tempest993•

Corellians have no use for odds!

1
TheThirdBlackGuy•

I doubt they knew at the time what their odds were.

6
felpz123•

they probably knew they were pretty bad, considering all the dead allied soldiers that lay in front of them.

9
16807•

Except they're the first ones to land, so they were the only one who could play the dead allied soldiers.

4
[deleted]•

True, but you probably could get a good idea from all the artillery rounds and the machinegun fire, not to mention the hundreds of mines buried underneath you.

5
mayhap11•

10,000 casualties were expected. These men would have known that.

2
okayplayer•

Well, given that such probabilities are constantly changing, I don't blame them.

1
[deleted]•

[deleted]

2
Jack000•

I've always wondered why they didn't carry shields. I know it's too heavy for normal use, but for landing it kind of makes sense. Those landing craft are basically sitting ducks.

1
HelpMeThink•

I'm pretty sure they had absolutely no idea what the percentages of staying alive were.

0
tortiousconduct•

I'm pretty sure you're missing the point.

6
[deleted]•

[deleted]

7
andkore•

But... they didn't know that they had less than a less than 50% chance of making it out OK. In fact I think they greatly underestimated the defenses at Omaha Beach. They thought it would be somewhat similar to the other beaches, I think.

0
zBriGuy•

Thanks a lot. I stared at that image for like 5 minutes looking for a picture of Mae West before giving up and googling it and found out that you were talking about an inflatable life jacket.

2
trsdctvsb•

It's a world war 2 term that a lot of pilots used. When inflated; the jacket gave you a bosom that reminded onlookers of the gorgeously goodlooking actress Mae West - and especially her rig. I think that was about as profane people got back then.

1
kotrin•

death happened

1
tomparker•

I'm told that some jumped off the ramps, landed in shell holes 10 feet deep and drowned immediately under the weight of their gear and that image haunts me. Whoever you were, I am sorry that happened.

46
dmajoraddnine•

I'm no history buff, but I remember hearing that part of this was due to the fact that A) all of the pre-landing air ordnance was dropped too far inland and B) choppy seas forced some landing craft to deploy further from the shore than they expected.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Omaha_Beach#Initial_assault

16
[deleted]•

They show that in Saving Private Ryan

8
beargarms•

what a scene.

1
thirteenthirty7•

I was told that the people that knew how to swim mostly died because they fought to get to the surface and eventually succumbed. But the guys that didn't know how to swim walked along the bottom of the ocean floor to the shore and many more of them survived proportionally.

Dont know if theres any truth to it though...

1
plutooo•

no dude, you shit your pants thinking about what they did. they did a lot more asskicking than pantsshitting.

26
16807•

a lot more asskicking and dying

2
plutooo•

yeah. WHAT THE FUCK HAVE YOU DONE?

4
edubation•

Played as them in video games

3
binary•

I posted a picture of a funny cat last week

2
[deleted]•

So guys, you see that beach there with all the smoke, bullets flying, bombs exploding, people dying before they even get to it?

Yea, you gotta make it across all that.

24
mdwright•

hell, I wouldn't even want to be this guy taking the picture! How all these people just went for it blows my mind.

10
Luckybeargod•

The worst thing is after wading through hell, some idiot in London nearly destroyed all the photos.

Capa took 106 pictures in the first couple of hours of the invasion. However, a staff member at Life in London made a mistake in the darkroom; he set the dryer too high and melted the emulsion in the negatives in three complete rolls and over half of a fourth roll. Only eleven frames in total were recovered. Capa never said a word to the London bureau chief about the loss of three and a half rolls of his D-Day landing film.

90% of one man's day in hell, gone forever.

21
okayplayer•

I would have strangled every. single. one. of them. Jesus christ. As a photographer, I know how devastating it is to lose some of your most valuable work (HD crash). But this is on a totally different level. Shitshitshitshit.

4
elustran•

Their balls are so big, I'm surprised they could get out of that transport without tripping on them.

19
[deleted]•
-1
PoopingIn321•

Do I want to watch this video ? Yes. Am I scared of shitting my pants? Yes.

1
coconutcorey•

When I see pictures like this I wonder how they managed to step off.

16
DesCo83•

As someone who was in the Army (but NOTHING even remotely close to that) I can tell you the most important lesson I learned in the military, possibly in my life is: You can do amazing things when you don't have a choice.

43
identifytarget•

Very wise words, but never forget the inverse. You can do monstrous atrocious things when you don't have a choice.

14
okayplayer•

Please correct me if I am wrong, for I am by no means an expert. I listened to an NPR story about war, and how the Army dehumanizes its soldiers by training them to comply with every order or something like that. It's late, and I can't think. Does this make sense?

2
DesCo83•

It's true to a point, but I hate it when people phrase it like that because it paints a picture of mindless robot soldiers doing whatever they're told.

Yes, you're trained to follow all orders, but you have to remember that there are general orders and code of conduct that supersede any other order that you could be given. You can't be given (and legally be expected to follow) and order that contradicts a higher order.

There's nothing dehumanizing about it. Honestly, I found it rather...um...humanizing. It's cliche, but the Army made me be all I could be.

2
okayplayer•

Thank you very much. I appreciate your perspective.

1
Animent•
1
phister•

I've never been in a situation close to that but from what I've heard it's as simple as, "If I don't step off my buddy is going to die."

32
[deleted]•

that or it's more about the adrenaline kicking in and psychologically thinking that doing something for your survival is much better than doing nothing at all.

3
muirnoire•

Because thats what warrior do. 70 million died in WW2. Someone had to stop the madness.

10
HiveMined•

Wait, wasn't it warriors who started the madness? I'm confused.

1
muirnoire•

No. Politicians and madmen do that.

2
dimensional_dan•

Aren't politicians and madmen civilians?

2
scrumpydoo23•

Yeah, but most of them were civilians.

0
sam480•

Hence the stepping in.

9
munky_g•

They became soldiers.

They didn't become 'warriors'...

0
Hughtub•

People do dumb things when their leaders lie that X is trying to take over the world and take their freedom. It's the same illusion every soldier who loses his life in Iraq has died under.

-15
hoboto•

right. nazi germany definitely wasn't trying to take over the world.

/sarcasm

10
fec2455•

Poland attacked them right. Remember the Gleiwitz incident

1
Hughtub•

Poland, with unconditional support from England and France to do whatever they wanted to make Germany invade them, attacked the Gleiwitz radio tower. The Allies, who had crushed the testicles beyond repair, of over 100 soldiers in their charge, torturing many others, then got the "confession" of a single soldier, the SOLE source of this "incident". Allied revisionists invented the lie that German soldiers dressed as Polish soldiers, kidnapped random Poles and dressed them as SS men and then shot them. The problem: this event was not used by Germany nor was any reference made by them of SS soldiers killed, in the 44 reports made in the week prior to their invasion of Poland. Bottom line: if the event was done by them, they would have milked the hell out of it. They didn't. They didn't take a photo of the dead SS soldiers (polish) nor were there any neutral witnesses to it. Polish nationalists, egged on by the unconditional defense guarantee, and desire to expand Polish territory, attacked Gleiwitz, in Germany.

0
gmick•

Don't forget Japan. They were just minding their own business when China and our fleet got in their way.

1
[deleted]•

Honestly, I know that people say that you can be a hero when the time calls for it, but I don't think that I could ever be that brave. Kudos to them, we should be forever grateful.

13
MikeOfAllPeople•

The goal in war is not to shit your pants for your country, it's to make the other poor bastard shit his pants for his country.

13
turnlikeawheel•

Oh, Patton, you have a way with words, you do.

1
gehenom•

shat is the past tense of shit.

12
MaybeComputerOP•

I was making a general statement about the nature of the military, past and present. If I had been focusing on WW2 alone, you would have been absolutely correct.

11
maldio•

will have shat is the future perfect form of shit

7
flarkenhoffy•

Don't forget the present progressive: be shittin'

7
Jackie_Paper•

"Will haven shat" -Streetmentioner

0
cajungator3•

Shitting... Is a gerund form of shit.

3
turnlikeawheel•

So if you bit something in the past, you bat it?

0
MaybeComputerOP•

On a side note, don't think that I take this sacrifice lightly. These men faced soul-crushing fear and still did their jobs. They did them damn well, and as a result, I can post little comments like this without the fear they took for me. so yes, the title uses a swear word. But I guarantee they used those words too. Because men are human, and war is dirty, and like all people trying to make a point, sometimes they punctuated them with profanity for emphasis. Call it tasteless, but don't call it inaccurate and don't call it unrealistic.

12
professorboat•

I thought your title was actually incredibly apt. These were not superheroes, they were real people, young men just like me (and most redditors). So they almost certainly were shitting their pants. But they manned up and sacrificed themselves for us. It is something I doubt I could ever do. And I have been tearing up just thinking about the shit they went through for us when reading these comments. I think your title helps to remind that any of us could've been in that position.

2
[deleted]•

[deleted]

11
gjs278•

okay. I'm going to actively use that freedom and inform you that I'm ashamed you were part of a military that has done horrendous things to the afghani civilians.

5
[deleted]•

[deleted]

1
gjs278•

You are ashamed that I was part of the military?

yes. as an american, I feel ashamed that I live in a country that would have troops who signup for illegitimate wars when they know our government is incapable of using them properly.

1
okayplayer•

Afghanistinani?

0
synergy_•

Blame the government - he was just following orders.

0
gjs278•

blame him, he signed a contract that said he would follow government orders no matter what they were

2
reslez•

Thank you for your service!

0
[deleted]•

incredible bravery.

10
TrevorChristensen•

Yeah man, war photographers are bad ass.

9
Old_School_Thinking•

RIP Papa.

7