r/AskReddit•
[deleted]

Men: if you could be a "house husband", would you?

I'm not really looking for advice; I'm just curious as to what other men would do in this situation. My wife just got a promotion, and her salary doubled from $40,000 to $80,000. She now makes twice as much as I do, and has suggested that if I wanted to, I could quit my job, stay home, take care of the housework, and have time to work out and write. However, if I keep my job, we would gross $120,000 together, and be able to put away a shitload of money.

I'm tempted to keep my job. Earning my own salary allows me to retain a measure of independence. Since I'm paying half of the bills, I don't have to ask permission if I want to indulge myself. At the same time, I never particularly liked working for other people, and I am a lot better at the domestic shit than my wife is, since I had to help my crippled mother with the housework as a younger man. And I would have plenty of time to work out and write.

What would you do in my position?

EDIT: I won't be quitting my job, but I think it's interesting to argue the merits or lack thereof of men staying home and taking care of the domestic shit while women work. Given that the current recession has put more men out of work than women, it's a situation that a lot of people have to face by necessity. I'm lucky enough to have a choice.

Posted Mar 9, 2010, 3:55 PM UTC · edited

5151.4K
[deleted]•

[deleted]

374
[deleted]•

That's what concerns me as well. I think that if I were to take on the domestic role, I would be supporting her by ensuring that she has a clean home and warm meals waiting for her, but she might not see it that way. It worked out reasonably well when I took care of the housework while unemployed and looking for a new job, but that was a case of "Since I'm here, and it needs to be done, I might as well do it." She's done the same when between jobs.

117
Stogie•

WHY ARE YOU ON REDDIT ALL DAY GO CLEAN RAH RAH RAH

252
stdlib•

Your wife is Lady GaGa?

Rah rah oo la laaaaa

275
[deleted]•

All I can think of during that part of the song is "cock gobbler"

23
Servios•

I fucking wish. Secondly because of chaloux's comment.

1
S7evyn•

oo la

Great, now all I can think about is "Ulla!".

1
[deleted]•

Today's a slow day; I'm baby-sitting a bunch of data conversion processes that only require my active attention when something goes wrong.

29
hiS_oWn•

second question: what are you doing outside of the kitchen, not getting me a beer?

45
[deleted]•

Keep your job.

1
peacepoetry•

why are you playing xbox all day blahblabhalh

1
faprawr•

make me a samich, dude

-1
reddithatesjews7•

80% of couples where the woman leads in salary end up in divorce, usually the cause is cheating..

Better check the phone to see if she has someone named Theo on it

-8
vitiate•

Citation needed.

6
[deleted]•

[deleted]

2
Browzer•

Don't underestimate how completely boring it is to stay home all day. I'm starting a new job in a foreign country next month. In the meantime, I'm staying at my mom's place. Being home all day is dull as hell. Yes, I have some projects I am working on and am trying to be active, but you can only sit at the dining room table working on your laptop for so long. I can't wait to start my new job.

45
IndIka123•

I never get tired of sitting on my ass. Fuck I wish I had a woman that made 80k and would take care of me while I cleaned the house and cooked meals. Sounds fantastic.

34
Browzer•

Sitting on your ass is fun for the first week. After that, it gets old. Fast. I like to actually accomplish things.

18
[deleted]•

I never get tired of dicking around on the internet and watching TV, either. The complete inability to be bored is under-appreciated. I'm a feminist, but I'm also lazy as fuck, and I wouldn't say no if some dude wanted to work all day so I could sit at home cooking and folding laundry in front of the View.

1
[deleted]•

[deleted]

1
[deleted]•

[deleted]

1
paulrpotts•

It depends on you and your personality. Personally, I've got pretty much an infinite to-do list of writing, music, recording, podcasts, essays, programming projects... oh, and I love to cook serious meals, like a 7-course Indian feast.

and programming jobs at an office tend not to be that much different than working at home. Many days I wind up with no actual face-to-face interaction with co-workers at all.

What I do need to do is figure out how to set up more occasions and excuses for actually getting out, getting exercise, and interacting with people... getting none of that whatsoever is bad for you...

1
[deleted]•

it is strange, because my wife is a total women's libber. i find it hypocritical. men don't resent women doing all the household shit. but she resented it when i was in that role. so i work. and in fact, her goal is that someday she will be a stay at home mom. talk about hypocrisy. alas.

32
[deleted]•

The whole point of women's liberation was to liberate them from socially-defined gender roles. However, while there is a small men's liberation movement, it's more concerned with fathers' rights and false rape accusations than it is with ensuring that men aren't bound by socially-defined gender roles.

85
AMerrickanGirl•

Tell me about it. That "mens rights" subreddit basically tries to blame women for every ill known to mankind - they're just the male version of rabid feminists.

22
ac_m•

Personally, I think this is more of a psychological thing than it is a social or civil rights issue. I'm thinking women would like to have as much rights as a man when it comes to the government; but when it's gets personal, like a significant other, they really want a man that can take care of her and her children. We're animals. Survival of the fittest.

-8
[deleted]•

Well, to be fair, there is a LOT more work involved when there are kids at home. If you are just upkeeping a house, that's relatively easy. If you are doing that AND taking care of children, it becomes infinitely harder and more labor-intensive.

21
[deleted]•

nevertheless, there is a huge double-standard in our society. there is little to no resentment from a man when the woman stays home (without kids) to take care of the household, finances, and pets. but there is great resentment from women if the man doesn't have a job and instead does the household, finances, and pets.

4
ConstipatedSherlock•

I was a stay at home dad for a while both when a dad and not a dad... I did not think having to take care of the kid made it infinitely harder. Read to him, bathed him, played with him, etc. It wasn't too bad, just had a routine his looked something like this:

Play, eat, sleep, play, eat, sleep, play, pick up all toys, eat, bathe, sleep

Pretty easy to play with a little one, read to them, give 'em toys to chew on, make big structures out of wooden blocks they can knock over, chase 'em, tickle 'em, you get the idea. And if you get tired, you can always cuddle with 'em and nap too.

During his naps I'd either nap with him, clean, or play video games/reddit.

I thought it was super easy to stay caught up with all the house work and baby playing.

Sometimes it is distracting to do other work, because even if you are in the mood to do something, the baby is just so much more entertaining to watch and talk to.

Though it went on for a couple of months, these were exceptional circumstances mind, neither one of us are stay at homers. We are poor. My lady wasn't really resentful of me staying home, mainly because I'm a super awesome cook and generally cook anyway. It was stressful for her because I make more money though and she was stressed looking at the full financial burden of the family.

Eventually she wants to just be a stay at home mom. Which is fine by me, eventually I'd like to just be a stay at home dad, I don't know if we'll ever be in a position where that is more than a temporary possibility.

Staying at home, compared to my normal work, it is a lot easier and less stressful. Not to mention fun. So much fun.

1
Mannex•

their minds say "gender roles can be switched" but their hearts say "WHY ISNT THE MAN PROVIDING!?"

this is also why you should never listen to relationship advice from a woman. they lie to themselves and they lie to you, without meaning it.

5
Ella404•

dude there are several women on this thread talking about how happy they are with the stay at home arrangement.

8
[deleted]•

[deleted]

1
[deleted]•

don't let her? well, in this economy it is unlikely that we will be able to afford living as a single-income couple with a kid. ideally, it would be nice to have a stay-at-home parent.

1
uhm•

i would resent my wife if she decided to be a housewife. if she was a mom, then for sure, then i would be cool with it. but no work w/ no kids? yea, that would be grounds for a stern talking to...while she makes me a sammich.

1
cazbot•

You've got it better than me, my wife is a stay at home mom, but would rather be working full time, but also completely rejects the idea of me staying home instead. We both have the same earning power.

1
rogerssucks•

I keep telling you -- she's a bitch.

1
peacepoetry•

it was strange ... i was in woman's studies course (college senior level course) and I was one of two men in that classroom ...

... and pretty much everyone there wanted a career AND wanted to have kids and be a stay at home at some point.

they want it all.

1
achilles•

Sounds like a typical feminist to me.

-1
[deleted]•

[deleted]

5
paulrpotts•

Look at the tax situation before thinking it's a lot of money. Tax rates on 120K are a lot higher than tax rates on 80K. I'm not saying it wouldn't be more income, but just that it wouldn't be as big an increment post-tax as it might appear.

If they had kids, I'd say that it might even be a wash, if they had to factor in day care, sitters, or child care expenses. A lot of couples are basically throwing away the wife's income that way.

2
[deleted]•

[deleted]

1
fduppa•

man, really, in the long run, money will be an issue.

I'd suggest to keep your actual work, or at least get a part time job so you at least have some money to take her out to dinner, and be you the one who pays.

The fact that she says you can do it, doesn't mean that you should.

Unless that what she really means is that you should quit, and get full-time on some personal project that you might have unattended due to lack of time. That gets reasonable, since you would be doing something that could make you win even more money, doing your stuff. If you go on because of this, be sure to clean every day, to have a meal almost ready when she comes, and to work on that project at least your actual working time minus 1 hour.

But to stay at home, just to clean and workout, it's a no-no.

PS: sorry for my bad english.

3
xcbsmith•

I think it really depends on who your wife is and whether you are actually good at the job. One of my friends is clearly better at taking care of the kids and the home, and she clearly knows it. She'd like him to get a job because it'd give them more money and she thinks he'd be happier, but she is actually quite proud of the job he is doing.

2
orestia•

Being a woman whose husband is currently out of work, I can confirm that sinnerman is correct...

1
AnnaRKey•

As I said to sinnerman, as long as you're both pulling your weight, and she's not cleaning up when she gets home, I don't think you'll have problems. Level-headed people are going to keep themselves in check with stuff like this. If she likes her jobs, and suggested that you stay home while she works, I'd trust her word for it.

1
leevs11•

The problem is that most men can understand that the woman is busy all day keeping the house up and what not. Women don't have this same logic. She will eventually see you as just sitting on your ass all day.

So I think you must work hard to get published and I would leave every day to write somewhere else.

0
libertao•

To be fair, no house within reason has 40 hours worth of housework to be done each week (or 45-50 if we're factoring in commutes).

12
schoolisdeath•

Definitely true with Ortus's addition.

I would remember being home sick from school when I was young, and I was shocked at how little my mom did all day. ...And yet still managed to be stressed out. That's skill.

19
Ortus•

To be fair, no house without kids has 40 hours worth of housework to be done each week (or 45-50 if we're factoring in commutes).

FTFY

14
[deleted]•

For me it's not the house, per se, but our property. We are on a ranch and just yesterday the wind took our hay tarp off, so I had to trudge around and retrieve it, then put it back over the hay before the rain came.

Then, since the hay was uncovered, our horses broke three strands of barbed wire fence and bent over two steel fence posts, as well as breaking the electric fence wire at the top and breaking off a cedar post so they could get to the hay.

So after the tarp was covering the hay, I had to round up the horses and set up a temporary electric fence to contain them while I dug up and re-cemented the cedar post, removed and replaced the steel posts, and restrung the barbed wire and patched the electric.

This isn't typical, but this ranch and the house can keep me occupied for near 40 hours a week while I'm not working.

5
[deleted]•

You obviously do not have young children. When they are young (I have a 5yo, 4yo, and 2yo) they require constant care and can wreck a room in under 5 minutes. So, to be fair, you aren't being fair.

EDIT: the point here is that children can cause much more than 40 hours of housework a week in ADDITION to the care time they require directly.

4
leevs11•

No not at all. I keep my house up and work 40 hours a week. It only takes about an hour a week...

3
Mithros•

I'll agree that there's usually not much housework to do (especially when the kids are in school!), but I do vividly remember my mother volunteering for Boy Scouts, Girl Scouts, PTA and the Bridge Players' Club. As a stay at home parent, you're really only ever as busy as you commit yourself to being. Mom was pretty busy with things tangentially related to children.

3
ghostchamber•

Taking care of children factors in as well.

1
[deleted]•

[deleted]

1
[deleted]•

You cook for her? Oh lord. Well, if it doesn't bother you, go for it. No way I think I could or would do that. What's the point of being married? Do you have to ask her for sex, too? For christ's sake. Does she limit you to three sex sessions per week? Jesus christ. Do you realize that a hooker would be cheaper and less stressful?

-2
[deleted]•

Does she limit you to three sex sessions per week?

No, she doesn't, you sexist twit. And yes, I cook. I don't do it just for her. I do it for myself, because I'm a better cook than she is.

Do you realize that a hooker would be cheaper and less stressful?

Sure, if all I wanted was sex with a stranger.

2
komphwasf3•

50 years of women's lib movement try to convince men that women do more work at home then men do at work. The funny part being, women in the male's position think the same thing about men who are in their position

40
Jibrish•

Why do both parties have to do the same amount of work?

30
xcbsmith•

I don't know that there is a compelling case that everyone ought to do the same amount of work around the house, but one could see that a fair partnership would imply either that both parties put in equal effort to the "venture", or that there are to be a proportionate distribution of the rewards.

2
originalucifer•

human nature. somewhere along the line someone thought everything should be "fair".

1
Jibrish•

I'm more old-fashioned in the sense that, if I were married, would want her to stay at home. Though I understand that the house doesn't really require a full 40 hours a week without kids.

I personally want to be a provider. If she feels strongly about working though that's OK with me.

1
peacepoetry•

its all about being complimentary

my cousin who has 3 kids explained the concept to me... if you do the same exact thing as your wife 50/50 then in her eyes she'll think she's doing more and in your eyes you'll think you're doing more. It just comes down to bias.

So what you do is task yourself with different shit than your wife ... tasks that compliment each other.

1
[deleted]•

shh! we all have to work very hard at being equal until we can't tell each other apart, naked. if you can spot the difference between yourself and your mate, you're probably a sexist neanderthal.

-2
MsKillian•

Any feminist worth his or her salt knows that's not the goal of feminism. You just sound like you have a bone to pick.

47
rhino110•

Well, you are commenting on reddit during what I imagine are work hours. Just cause you're "at work" for 8 hours doesn't mean you're doing 8 hours of work, so don't expect her to do 8 hours of work at home to keep in stride with you.

2
PissinChicken•

I would honestly prefer it while my kids are young. I come from a house where both parents worked, a lot. From age 8 on I pretty much managed my own life and saw my parents in passing. Now I am in the corporate world and its a fucking joke. I would much rather invest my time in my childern (if I had any) then in some sham of a company who is going to bend me over and f me in the A anyways.

10
[deleted]•

[deleted]

6
framy•

That way it looks like him bending over, see those little legs?

1
paulrpotts•

Mod up for the glorious radical revelation that, you know, the world of work is often not all that meaningful or rewarding...

3
[deleted]•

lol, even if this is not true it is what I would expect. When she is at home she is working harder than me .. when I am at home and she is out working. she is working harder than me.. fuck I am jokexplainer now ...

4
[deleted]•

[deleted]

3
[deleted]•

just "cleaning" all day? when i was not employed, and acting as the house husband, i wasn't "cleaning", i was CLEANING. i did her laundry, her ironing, cleaned the bathtub so she could take baths, did all the shopping, all the chores, all the trash, dishes, and finances. why is it that men don't resent wives for doing all that, but women resent husbands for doing all that?

17
temp9876•

I know men who resent their wives for that

10
[deleted]•

I do 80-90% of the CLEANING, I'm the only one that walks the dog, only one with a license, and I have a kid, and I work (evenings and nights).

(Secret message: my house is a mess 50% of the time :D I'm currently putting off doing the dishes by browsing reddit.)

5
mydoghasocd•

oh, i get it, you do the CLEANING

0
[deleted]•

um idiot. i DID the cleaning. yes. get your tense right. i was not employed. what should i have done, sit on my ass?

1
Jibrish•

What you said is really about an hour a day.

The best though is people who go to work and dick off all day, then come home to complain to their S.O. about how busy they were. All the while resenting them for being home all day.

-6
YesImSardonic•

You have obviously no idea.

EDIT: I am incorrect.

1
[deleted]•

You know what happened? You were enjoying it too much. The only thing worse then a woman getting what she wants, is seeing her husband happy.

2
Glameow•

Since we are brainwashed our entire lives to think that any man who is not out at the coalface all day must be lazing, it's not going to be easy to get past that.

But anyway, the old way isn't exactly problem free. Plenty of husbands bitch that their wives are lazing at home.

2
GovernmentBubble•

That's because staying home with the kids is actually way easier than going to work every day.

1
Kancho_Ninja•

I have 5 kids. You want to say that again?

79
Kimos•

That's your crazy choice though.

58
Kancho_Ninja•

Choice? CHOICE?!

I'm Catholic! I don't have a choice! God makes the choice. HE gave me 5 kids to raise, and I'm sure in HIS great plan my burden has a purpose...

12
lebruf•

Fuck you, my mom wasn't crazy

2
[deleted]•

Someone's choice to have kids isn't related to the original statement of "staying home with kids is actually way easier than going to work every day."

PS, I didn't find it way easier. I've been the stay at home parent of one incredibly easy-going kid and I've been the working parent. Working is hundreds of times easier for me than being a stay at home parent. I'm not in an office job, either. My work is pretty physical and rarely affords me time to sit down outside of my dinner break.

2
poopmast•

5 bottles of extra strength benadryl and 5 kids are a breeze.

8
phreakymonkey•

I just duct tape them to the wall.

1
[deleted]•

5 bottles of Prozac and Oxycontin and 5 kids are a breeze.

there ya go!

1
paulrpotts•

4 kids here... my stay-at-home wife works her ass off...

3
[deleted]•

[deleted]

2
phlux•

yeah, but you live on MARS

1
[deleted]•

Staying home with the kids is actually way easier than going to work every day.

There, I said it (I've done it).

1
[deleted]•

I've done both as well and had the complete opposite experience. Stayed at home for 2 years and have been working for close-to 2 years. Working is easy cakes.

1
GovernmentBubble•

What do your 5 kids do when you're on Reddit?

0
temp9876•

What does your work do when you're on Reddit?

17
Kancho_Ninja•

4 in school, 1 underfoot. Check out my activity. You'll see it's not that frequent.

9
[deleted]•

I hate it when people ask questions like this. It's as though kids don't sleep or ever entertain themselves.

8
temp9876•

'Easier' isn't a very good comparison. I've tried to be a stay at home mom and I find it infinitely more difficult and less rewarding than holding a job. Different people feel differently about different kinds of work, there is no point comparing them directly.

31
FigNinja•

After a 9 hour day of babysitting my 3 year old nephew I was way more tired than a 9 hour day of my job. I basically played with him, tried to keep him from breaking himself or the house, and cleaned up after him constantly. Is that hard? No. It's tedious. My mom stayed home with my sister and I until we were in school. When I asked her about it, she said she did it because she loved us and thought it was best for us but she was so glad to go back to work and talk to adults all day.

I'm home right now because I go laid off. We don't have kids so I have less to do. Sure, I'm spending time looking for jobs and such. Plus I'm spending more time on cooking to save us money. (If I'm home all day, I can bake bread and make long cooking dishes that maximize cheaper ingredients.) I'm a bit envious of my husband when he gets home. I miss people and projects. I worry if I stay like this much longer I'll run out of interesting conversation. There's only so much I can talk about what I heard on NPR that day. I want to be able to talk about what I did today without boring him or myself.

10
BigHarold•

I hear you. I've babysat my brother's two kids (3 and 1 y.o). I was dead on my feet at the end of each day.

Pssst, go here: TodayILearned. Lots of interesting things for conversation.

3
brightifrit•

Do you have kids? You don't, do you? Not only is it just as hard and occasionally harder (just as going to work is occasionally harder, I know because I've done both), but for some people it's mentally and emotionally frustrating and can be a huge sacrifice. At work you have concrete goals, and you make a direct impact on the world. You talk to other people during the day. You bring home concrete rewards that your family and the rest of the world respect. At home, you're stuck cleaning the same messes, running the same errands, never changing, isolated from the rest of the world, trapped in a repetitive physical world that philosophers for hundreds of years have discussed as something less than fulfilling. Not only that, but you never get a break! Weekend comes, and it's actually more work for you.

23
poopmast•

"you're stuck cleaning the same messes, running the same errands, never changing, isolated from the rest of the world, trapped in a repetitive physical world that philosophers for hundreds of years have discussed as something less than fulfilling. Not only that, but you never get a break! Weekend comes, and it's actually more work for you."

Sounds like working a backoffice position at a financial company to me.

12
brightifrit•

That's part of my point. Both staying at home and working a paying job have their challenges, and I would never say that one is "easier" than the other. Different people have different needs, too, and I don't think those needs are clearly divided along gender lines.

3
godbois•

Or retail.

1
lynn•

Or my job right now.

1
tepidpond•

Sounds like every fucking job I've ever had. Except that I didn't get to stay at home, watching my kids grow up and be awesome.

1
klafka•

statements like this make me so happy i'm childless

3
brightifrit•

Well, I should mention that I also love my kid(s?) and overall love raising them, or I wouldn't put up with all the other crap. I'd be a full-time author or something. For me, it's worth it. For now. One or two more and I'm done.

1
Nougat•

Kids are hard, but the upshot is that you really can't get fired and you get to make every decision about how you want everything to go.

2
PityFool•

Bull. Shit.

2
MsKillian•

Do you have any experience with kids?

1
SirPlus•

Correct. If a woman complains, they aren't doing it right. In fact, if you manage it properly and bring the kids up right, the more kids you have actually makes it easier.

Any man who falls for this 'Oh my! What a day I've had!' crap from his woman deserves to have his head read.

-7
jojolawebb•

Many years ago my husband became unemployed and I upped my hours to 60 to 70 hours per week to make up the difference. After staying home, running the kids around, and cooking meals his revelation was. "How did you do all this and work, I'm exhausted".

Having done both I would rather work construction than stay home taking care of little kids, cleaning messes, and cooking.

6
Jubinator•

I can understand having that having to work and take care of all the household chores would be crazy, however I think they are trying to compare only working to not working at all and doing the housework. I personally don't think you can really compare the two, knowing myself, I work much better under stress and therefore I would probably work better at a job. It seems like it is much more of a personal preference.

1
SirPlus•

I've worked in construction and I have to say you must be on the easy end of the job if you think running a house is harder. You just have to get the effort ratio correct which takes a week or so.

1
emkat•

I'm assuming you have no kids?

1
ApathyJacks•

That's not a question.

2
emkat•

Pulls out squirt bottle

Go away pedant, go away

squirt squirt

4
ApathyJacks•

Never.

1
[deleted]•

no. and when we have kids, she's the one who wants to be the stay-at home parent, and she doesn't want me to be the stay-at home parent.

1

how about a AmA on this? sounds very interesting.

1
[deleted]•

I would, but I would also go to college too.

1
[deleted]•

Yeah wife at home = "you work 40 hours I work 24/7" me at home, prioritizing chores better = "you just sit around all day while I'm out working"

1
mydoghasocd•

Maybe you should take cooking classes and clean the toilet more often

1
ThePsion5•

If you could switch gender roles without problems, I don't think that we'd have such a hard time understanding each other.

1
nitrousconsumed•

I like your song.

1
ghan-buri-ghan•

There's a lesson here. If you find yourself in the reverse situation, and you genuinely think it's the right setup for both of you, you've got to avoid resentment.

1
rogerssucks•

If she's not a bitch she won't think this way.

1
desolo•

Did you try getting a part-time job, or something to show her that you do something productive?

1
AnnaRKey•

Uh, that sucks dude. As long as each of you pulls your weight, the other shouldn't get upset, or resent the other one. It shouldn't matter who does what, as long as it gets done, and all the weight isn't on the other's shoulders.

Why would anyone get jealous of the one staying at home? If you go/went back to work, wouldn't that mean more house-work juggling to be done between both of you?

1
[deleted]•

I've done it when we were abroad on an expat project she was given for a year. It was not good. I bored myself stupid. I worked from home, but without an excuse to go into town and meet people, and the interaction with people at work that I'd been used to, I nearly went nuts.

Not good if you're used to interacting with others. Also not good if you're accustomed to intellectual challenges and some sort of stimulating conversation on a regular basis.

1
exist2resist•

I was actually going to post a reply stating, NO. I read an article on role gender reversal and more often then not, the stay at home husband is resented, which often leads to divorce. Do not be a stay at home husband, it does not work.

1
[deleted]•

I'll save that to shut up any stay-at-home moms who bitch at me.

0
pdclkdc•

save some money. you can always quit later or both retire early. either way you'll be ahead of most of the schmucks living off credit.

fuck, save a ton of money.

318
[deleted]•

That's funny; I had just suggested this to Mrs. Van Helsing.

101
[deleted]•

Make no lifestyle changes for 2 years. Stay exactly as you are now for two years and take her 40 grand and pay off debt or invest.

107
[deleted]•

this is incredibly wise... I know so many people in upper management who are in bigger debt than me.

Rather than living their pre-promotion lives, they just scale everything up... instead of drinking $2 coffee, they drink $4.75 coffee.. instead of driving a honda, they drive BMWs.

I look at their salaries and think of it as all extra income to save, but does money make people forget how to live poor?

60
DoTheDew•

One of my bosses who owns about 10 pizzerias used to drive a honda accord with 280,000 miles on it even though he was a multi-millionaire.

40
slartibartfast24•

I find this phenomenon incredibly interesting. I think it is just easier to justify going to work everyday if you are using that money everyday. While temping I found it paradoxicly harder to keep working long term at jobs where I saved 50% of my income rather than those were I was only saving 10% of my income. Untill I decided to start saving for a house it just seemed that all that money was disapearing. On the few ocasions that I did buy expensive things, that work seemed justified.

11
[deleted]•

somewhat yes, but also you end up paying way more taxes too.

When I graduated I was making about 40k and after deductions was usually in the 15% bracket. Make a little more and now you are stuck in the 25% bracket. I got a raise to 60k, and then when I looked at my paycheck I was like 'thats it?' I got a 20k raise but almost half of it went to taxes (actually a little less than half - 32k AGI ~ 5k in fed income tax vs 52k AGI ~ 13k in fed income tax) add into that SS and Medicare and all of the other payroll taxes and your raise isn't really as big as you think it is. Of course if you increase your spending as if you were getting all of that 20k you are doubly screwed.

edit: the difference is about 5k vs the 8k I estimated above. source

7
[deleted]•

[deleted]

1
jrfish•

My income suddenly doubled with the start of a home business about four years ago. Instead of scaling everything up, I chose to live like I was living before. I didn't even quit my day job even though I could have. I basically went from making $50,000 per year at my day job to making that $50,000 plus another $50,000 from my business.

I'm very glad that I chose to just save the extra 50 grand, as I lost my day job two years later, and all that saved up money was a huge cushion for me. I own a house, so I have no idea what I would have done if I hadn't been saving that extra money. I probably would have gone into foreclosure.

1
[deleted]•

Conversely, applying some of your 'house husband' time to effective financial management (not to mention reduction in cost of working away from home), it's theoretically possible that you could stash away more money by not working.

Just food for thought.

In the end, this really should be something you and your spouse decide together.

4
elrizzy•

if you can reliably make $40,000 investing off of $80,000 gross a year you would be a financial mastermind.

17
[deleted]•

It's about finding ways to not spend the $40k. In reality, more like 25-30k after taxes. Then you take some more off for 2nd car/gas/insurance, etc. It adds up.

5
barryicide•

If he's going to make $40,000 while his wife is making $80,000, I don't think he would save more money by staying home and "financially managing" things. I don't think they would spend that much more money on work-related expenses (commuting, eating out, business casual clothes).

If his wife was making millions and he stayed home to manage the finances, that might make sense, but when he would still be making half her pay, it's not going to be an economical victory.

5
stephoswalk•

I think the point of a housespouse is that they manage the household chores including cooking (home cooked food is cheaper and healthier), cleaning (routine maintenance allows things to last longer) and budgeting (it can take a surprising amount of time investment to save money). There's a lot to be said for financial management by cost reduction.

1
mydoghasocd•

you think like an economist

1
[deleted]•

actually,... I think like a lazy person who would gladly stay at home finding ways to make his spouse's bacon all the more satisfying.

mmm... bacon.

1
robertbaker13•

Well. To save that kind of money by not working, you'd probably have to go straight-up urban scavenger. Reclamation and reappropriation of waste is good for both your wallet and the environment, and I imagine it is also very engaging and challenging, so you would definitely remain stimulated and active...

However, if she's anything like most American women making $80K, your wife is probably NOT interested in explaining to her coworkers that her husband is a 'freegan,' and that just because they have seen you digging around in the neighborhood dumpsters does not mean she is married to a homeless person.

1
MistyMountainHop•

Hey, do you kill vampires with a Fender Stratocaster? That would be awesome.

2
oldgreggthebunny•

If you can, use now to cut your expenses and live off one income or the other. My grandparents both worked and lived off one income for at least forty years, sticking the other one in savings of one sort or another. As a result, they are both retired and living at the same if not a slightly higher level than they had been while they were working.

1
d00n•

I agree that saving so that both of you can retire early is a great idea. That way, you both share in the joy of not working. :)

60
[deleted]•

At 50 you'll be so sick of the bitch you DO NOT want to see her all day. Count on it.

-17
[deleted]•

How old are you?

17
Melons•

I'm 12 and what is this?

5
[deleted]•

faggot

-9
Bikeridingjesus•

This is your chance to take a crack at your dream job. Do you have an idea of something you'd like to pursue? You said you're not really happy with your job...

Let me tell you a little secret. The amount that life gets amazing when you find something you love to do will blow your fucking head off.

Use this as an opportunity to find it.

15
[deleted]•

I wish I could upvote you more.

1
hogiewan•

save money now and when you have kids, you can have a reason to stay home.

2
[deleted]•

with the unstable seeming position of things today I would suggest he invest extra money in non-perishable assets like gold or land, not just save the money. Certainly keep some around, but if shit hits the fan you want something solid.

1
davidrools•

buy gold?! now is the worst time to buy gold. it's the perfect time to SELL gold, which is why there are advertisements everywhere trying to get YOU to buy other people's gold that they bought in 2007 or earlier for 1/5th of what it's worth now. That or they're trying to buy your gold jewelry for less than it's worth so they can sell it on the market for a killing.

good time to buy real estate though.

7
negitoro•

yeah, all those shady adverts trying to get you to mail your grandma's gold chains to the guy in the black suit for a pittance.

1
[deleted]•

it's funny, for as smart as reddit comes off, these kinds of comments always get downvoted. It's like, nobody wants to even consider the possibility of shit hitting the fan in the US. And then even the mere mention of it leads to "oh right, the apocalypse, etc etc"

Reality check for the rest of y'all: Paper currencies, "fiat" currencies ALWAYS fail. ALWAYS. Ours has lasted longer than most. That currency collapse shit gets messy. No, not everyone dies. Yes, a lot of people go through very difficult economic times. Gold will, actually, be very useful. Gold has been the standard for ... how long? Compare that to any paper currency in the history of the world. There's a reason why the rich are investing like crazy in gold and gold futures. Check out Marc Faber, for one. Or George Soros. Or Warren Buffet's investing partner at Berkshire, Charles Munger.

Not to say gold is the "silver bullet" so to speak. Any solid tangible asset will be of great value.
And yeah, keep some cash around, that will be useful for some time yet.

have an upvote sir, for knowing what you're talking about and dispensing worthy advice.

3
heliotropic•

yes, because when the shit hits the fan and the world falls apart gold will be very useful.

...

-1
SirTodd•

Indeed. Non-perishable food items will be the currency of our post-apocalyptic future.

"I'll buy that gun for 3 pouches of Campbell's chicken noodle soup."

8
Jubinator•

I think about things like this more often then I would like to admit. If my house could have a post-apocalyptic bunker, it would!

3
heliotropic•

they will be more useful than gold.

2
[deleted]•

when it hits the fan in one country it doesn't mean it hit the fan in another... and I also listed land.

0
[deleted]•

If shit hits the fan in America, it pretty much means it hits globally. In the absence of government, land will belong to whoever can keep it.

2
bofsta•

Agreed - Keep working, hire a maid to look after the house (sounds like you can afford it now) and put that cash away for an early retirement/early mortgage payoff.

1
[deleted]•

[deleted]

1
freightco•

Where will you get a 5% interest account today?

2
yipp_eeee•

A million bucks is not what it used to be. Trust me. If he's 60 in 20 years, maybe. Otherwise it probably wouldn't go as far as you think.

1
[deleted]•

I think being able to spend the entire day in your underwear trumps early retirement.

1
rdesktop7•

second

1
fuzzycuffs•

This is true. If you had (young) kids then maybe it would make more sense to stay home and take care of the kids if things like daycare cost more than you would make otherwise.

But if you are both single, keep working, save that money, do fun stuff in your youth, have children (if you like), and then use that money for them. Maybe if the situation is the same and she still makes a lot more than you, consider staying home.

1
CitizenPremier•

save a ton of money.

But not in dollars. There's trillions more of them these days. Invest in land, metals, bullets, cans of beans...

1
Lereas•

Seriously. Fucking 40k extra per year? Imagine your life with 80k and being comfortable. Now imagine being able to buy whatever the hell you want, and having something that I hope you find at least marginally interesting during the day. You can buy yourself a brand new flatscreen every month and more if you want.

It's worth it to have that put away.

0
[deleted]•

Now imagine being able to buy whatever the hell you want, and having something that I hope you find at least marginally interesting during the day. You can buy yourself a brand new flatscreen every month and more if you want.

I believe this what one might consider the opposite of saving.

2
Lereas•

Well, the point is that you have saved so much, you're able to do that. You could buy a flat screen every OTHER month and be saving like 25k a year.

1
StinkyWizzleteats•

but think of all the mindless television you could watch!

1
JustAGirl81•

My husband is a house husband. We decided even before we had a kid that he would stay at home and I would work because I have a college degree and he doesn't. He works part time for the school district so he has all the same days off as my son. He cooks, cleans, and does laundry and dishes. I don't think it's for everyone, but it works great for our family! I could never do the things he does around the house!

286
[deleted]•

Nice to get a woman's perspective, especially from a woman who appreciates what her man does at home.

146
turlian•

My last boss was the worker and her husband stayed home with the kids. She was the director of our IT department and there's no way he would have been making that much money. It worked out great, but she would tell me that the other moms kinda treated him like shit at school events. Like he was some lazy fuck letting his wife work. Aside from that, it seemed to work really well for them.

158
jblomberg•

I find this amusing, since those same moms probably complain about how much work it is being a housewife, and they work just as hard as their husbands. Because I've never heard that argument before. Ever.

198
HalfandHalf•

You get looked at that way even if you're not a man. For some reason people automatically think that spouse staying home = lazy, sitting around all day eating bon-bons and spending their SO's money. I can't speak from a males perspective but I'm personally a Homemaker and I constantly get looked down on or given looks because I'm not employed. I'm perfectly content being at home and doing the housework while my man brings in the money. Hell, I'm much better at being a homemaker than I am at being an employee anyway. I can honestly say I take pride and feel I'm living out some form of my purpose by taking care of the stuff at home. I dunno, wouldn't it be nice to have a clean house, fresh laundry, and a home-cooked meal to come home to after working long and hard (lulz)? Or am I just one of many who feel they'd have been better off in the 1950's?

23
rub3s•

Well, it is hard work ... for a woman.

1
seaoframen•

A typical day would consist of me waking around noon to smoke a bowl and order take-out. I would waltz around naked performing households chores. The rest of the day would be spent drinking in public and surfing. I would be a proud owner of a mini van and I wouldn't care what anyone else said about my manhood, because I was living the dream. When my wife came home, I would bitch about how hard it is being a stay at home dad.

1
[deleted]•

Feminists don't have a reputation for being a bunch of double standardising hypocrites for nothing.

-1
hellobrooklyn•

They just don't want the word getting out that being a housewife in the days of automation, nannies, housekeepers, tutors and daycare does not even add up to a 15 hour a week job.

-2
GetsEclectic•

Apparently they really want to retain their monopoly on vacuuming and doing dishes. If the internet has taught me anything, it's that I shouldn't care what society thinks about anything, because at least 73% of the people out there are completely retarded.

55
[deleted]•

I think you are estimating low with that 73%; I would say total population suffering from retardation (or rather, causing our suffering) is well into the 90% range.

26
as1126•

Crazy number, 73%. Where'd you come up with that?

(P.S. I think it's higher than that).

3
asdfman123•

at least 73% of the people out there are completely retarded.

Keep in mind many people are burdened with the demands of day-to-day life. Due to that stress, they don't have the perspective or ability to rise above it. I'd be less judgmental myself...

1
Beneventan•

My brother-in-law, who spent a few years as a house-husband, mentioned moms treating him nastily at schools and playgrounds as well. They always assumed that the only reason a full-grown man was hanging out near the monkey bars at the park was that he was a pedophile, not a dad.

52
turlian•

Exactly. I was at the park the other day and helped my 2 year old over a playground bridge by holding his hand. Another kid, 3 or 4y/o asked me for help as well, and I'll tell you I felt weird about doing it, like somebody was going to jump out of the bushes and accuse me of something.

It's a shame we men have been made to feel this way.

73
[deleted]•

I take my daughters to the playground and have met some nice people while playing with them. Some psycho's try to put out that attitude, but I just ignore them. I look at it as an easy way for them to let me know that they are people I don't want to know.

40
[deleted]•

tell your brother-in-law to shave off his moustache.

2
asdfman123•

My Dad really likes kids, but he has to hold himself back so he doesn't come across as a pedophile. I'm sure if he had the option, he'd play with random kids in the park. But that's simply not acceptable in today's society. And he's not creepy at all; he comes across as a upstanding citizen.

It's sad that we've gone from this "it takes a village to raise a child" attitude to "stay the hell away from my kids." We isolate ourselves far too much and I think investigative reporting has distorted the way we think, making us paranoid. C'mon people, if you want to protect your kids from physical danger stop driving them around in your car so much, and if you want to protect them from emotional danger then quit your fancy job and spend more time with them.

1
YesNoMaybe•

she would tell me that the other moms kinda treated him like shit at school events

Wow, that's crazy. When my wife and I had our first daughter, my work hours were very flexible. I did a lot of the parent stuff like taking her to her little gym classes and stuff. The other mom's LOVED it and gave me all kinds of attention. I mean, I never got anything like what that guy did (or any of the other dudes i this thread).

Of course, maybe they were giving him that kind of attention and he told his wife they weren't to make her not feel bad? I know I would never tell my wife about getting attention from other women.

34
slightlystartled•

do you happen to be a very pretty man?

37
swordgeek•

A lot of it is about context and locale.

A playground is fair game - anyone can walk up and skulk, even dirty old men. A closed environment (say a gym class or something with an instructor) has a (weak) requirement of being a parent in order to hang about.

Also, some places are paranoid - poor inner cities, places where stay-at-home dads are unheard of, etc.. My wife teaches on Saturdays, so last weekend I took my son to the neighborhood playground. Nearly half of the parents there were guys, and it was no big deal.

10
androk•

but, you made sure they knew you worked, not being a house husband is fine, you are just working odd hours in their mind.

1
badassumption•

They loved it because you were taking care of your daughter AND you had a job.

1
[deleted]•

I have had the exact same experience. My work hours are somewhat flexible so I do a lot of the parent teaching days at our co-op preschool. Everyone is more than friendly with me.

1
chambee•

I got that a lot when I decide to take 6months off to take care of my son so my wife can go back to work full time. people were always asking me where is the Mom ?

14
[deleted]•

You should have looked at the ground and told them you didn't know who the Mom was.

18
[deleted]•

Did you tell them "under the rose bushes"?

10
Glameow•

If they were being particularly bitchy, tell them she's dead/in a coma. That will shut them up with their nasty prejudices.

5
notcaptainkirk•

That's because women are sexist.

3
[deleted]•

[deleted]

16
mctaggert•

He tells his wife the other moms treat him like shit. I did the house husband thing for a couple of years when our daughter was in kindergarten and first grade. Once I got to know the other moms, they treated me fine. I even had a few propositions, but didn't go there.

I wouldn't want to spend a career being a house-husband, but if you have kids and get a chance to do it, do not pass it up. It was fantastic to get to spend so much time with my daughter. I really value that time in our lives. She's grown now, but we're still quite close.

2
poopmast•

How come women never assumes the husband might be super filthy rich and doesnt have to work?

1
[deleted]•

So those women were admitting they were lazy fucks and didn't want the secret out?

0
JustAGirl81•

Yeah, he's an amazing guy and it's worked for us for 10 years so far! I don't resent him at all. My mom was a stay at home mom and I just decided it wasn't for me. I think it's been really good for my son to have his dad at home. They are best buddies! I don't even know the last time I filled the dishwasher or vacuumed, and for that I am beyond thankful :)

41
mydoghasocd•

i'm jealous

9
panek•

Which country/state/cave do you live in that $80,000 is enough to stop working and fully support a family?

Sure, many families get by with much less. But if you ever want to have kids, an extra $40,000 for X number of years would probably help support them don't you think?

Keep in mind that no job is 100% secure. You wife loses her job in two years and you've suddenly been out of the game for two years and can't find work = financial disaster. Plus, you probably won't have that much money saved. Had you been working, you'd hopefully save some money for this type of situation.

Keep working.

You can be a stay-at-home-dad once your wife makes over $150,000.

22
int0x13•

80k is a lot of money to a lot of people in most parts of the country

44
panek•

I guess my point is not that you cannot support a family, but how does he want to live? An extra $40k a year goes a long way towards retirement, vacations, emergency situations and health benefits, possessions, and financial security (e.g., education) for your kids.

1
[deleted]•

Which country/state/cave do you live in that $80,000 is enough to stop working and fully support a family?

Pennsylvania.

26
ShadyJane•

PA represent. What part of PA?

9
YesImSardonic•

Texas, too.

3
[deleted]•

[deleted]

7
Glameow•

Going out to work costs quite a lot of money, so it's not always worthwhile.

For me the costs involve fuel, food, parking and smart clothes. Fuel is about £100 a month now, though the extra food costs can be kept down with some planning. If we had children, then childcare would add a huge amount. Then, as you mentioned, the house still needs looking after.

Personally I was always glad that I got to go home with mum after school, instead of being stuck in after school clubs for another two hours. I don't want any child of mine being raised by daycare. I mean no offence to child care staff, but they can't give my children the same love and attention that their parents and family can.

1
eatspam88•

Outside of major urban/suburban areas, $80,000 is a very good income. I don't make quite that much, and I'm still above the median income for my county and the surrounding counties.

6
[deleted]•

I was raised on 15-40k/year in southern california, family of 5.

4
cnadia•

-25k a year? you must be up to your eyeballs in debt!!!

1
FANGO•

There are costs associated with being a dual-income family, though. Sure he could go to work for that extra 40k, but then they have to either spend all their free time doing chores and whatnot or they have to hire a maid, and if they have a kid they have to pay for day care or a nanny, they'll end up eating more fast food because neither of them wants to cook after working all day, etc.

So he would be working for 40k, and then spending probably over half of it that he wouldn't have spent had he stayed at home. All of a sudden that doesn't seem like quite as good a proposition, no?

Of course if they don't have a kid then it's not so bad. But you mentioned wanting that extra 40k if you have kids, and I feel like having kids would lead to the exact opposite decision - in that case, it would be better for him to stay at home than to have a job of his own.

4
IrishShorty•

My parents raised two kids on 60k, and we were quite comfortable. 80k combined income, where I come from (smallish town), would make you the lower side of rich.

2
QnA•

Which country/state/cave do you live in that $80,000 is enough to stop working and fully support a family?

You can be a stay-at-home-dad once your wife makes over $150,000.

I can tell you are young, or rich. My parents raised the 3 of us on 30k a year and we lived ok. In a suburb that was starting to get a bit run down, sure, but it was no ghetto. 2 of us even went to college.

80k? 150k? Must be nice being rich. No offense, but if your concept of middle class is in the 80-150k range (USD), you have a very, very skewed view of the world.

2
[deleted]•

Just for comparisons sake - $80,000 (~ £54k) would be well above average income for a family in the UK (with the possible exception of London). Very comfortable indeed.

*Edit to add that of course in the UK we don't have to deal with huge medical bills and university fees for ourselves/kids, but also to add that I agree with your point. Saving up and working in the short term is bound to do you better in the long run.

1
mydoghasocd•

yeah but you guys have cheap healthcare and all those good safety nets and job security and shit.

2
JimmyShockTreatment•

Our family does just fine on 50K per year.

1
[deleted]•

My father raised a family (2 kids and a stay at home wife in nice little suburban 3 bedroom ranch) making <80k as a construction foreman, living in Northern Bergen County,NJ none-the-less. We didn't have a deprived childhood one bit. We had everything we needed, and even had luxuries like video games, toys, bikes and such. My mom drove a used but newer Honda. We did fine and he is still doing fine now. Oh yeah, we were also able to go to college without taking out student loans (we went to state schools). My brother and I had to work part-time for my spending money once we hit 16. He sacrificed a bit, but we never were really struggling. We just never owned a brand new car, or went out to dinner every week, but we went on vacations every now and then. It can be done, you just need to be good with your money. 80k is about 30k over the median income in the US.

1
ShinyRatFace•

Seriously? Depending on where you live, 80k is enough money to support three families.

In the area I live (Northern Florida) 25K can support a family of three comfortably. You can't judge everyone else's financial situation based on your own. I'm guessing you either live in a very expensive place or have a skewed idea of what it takes to finance a family.

1
[deleted]•

150,000? Seriously? Umm... we raise two kids very well on a pair of student loans. They have plenty of clothes, toys and extra-curricular activities. They are well fed. They even have RESPs because we don't want them to have to do the loan thing like us. Granted, we don't own a house, and we drive only one car, but other than that I don't think my kids get any less materially than their friends do. $80,000 sounds like a fortune.

0
[deleted]•

Appreciation is one thing. Sex is another.

Read up on the effects that "Mr. Momming" has on couples' sex lives. Apparently women like men to do a little housework, but being the stay at home dad is not a turn-on for many women.

6
JustAGirl81•

We have been married almost 10 years and still have sex at least 3 times a week. And it's not just boring blah sex- it's amazing. Who thinks about someone's job during sex? Is being a McDonald's worker a turn on? Is being a truck driver a turn on? Someone's job doesn't factor into a sex life.

3
[deleted]•

Sounds like you've won! Nice work!

3
battles•

"Who thinks about someone's job during sex?"

Women. Women are very concerned with the social status of their mate. Whereas men are typically concerned more with physical attributes.

0
[deleted]•

[deleted]

0
rogerssucks•

He must give fantastic blow jobs.

0
Deviant1•

My boyfriend stays at home. He lost his job about 15 months ago. It was a very specialized position, so the chances of him finding similar work are near-zero, even in a good economy. Additionally, the job was stressful on both of us. So, I told him that if he could make it easy for me to give more to my job - by cooking, cleaning, taking care of the dogs, taking care of the house - he could just stay home.

I see the value in what he does, and equate that to the money I put in to him being here (healthcare, food, shelter, toys). We have had some rough spots, though, because of his feelings of inadequacy about the situation. He would feel a lack of self-esteem, so he would act cranky or snippy. We've worked through most of it at this point, and I feel very well taken care of - dinner made every night, dry cleaning picked up, occasional random rewiring of things...

OP will need to discuss what "our money" and "my money" mean for each of them, where this money will come from and on what it will be spent. This has been a key topic in our household.

72
temp9876•

discuss what "our money" and "my money" mean

So important! If you make the choice that one partner focus on unpaid labour it has to be reflected in how the two of you manage finances. Giving up your job shouldn't mean giving up your right to disposable income.

50
diamond•

One simple solution to this is to have an extra account for each of you.

Here is the way we do it: My income and my wife's income both go into our joint account. But we each have a (low limit) credit card that is ours to use for whatever we want, and we pay each of those cards off completely at the end of every month. That way, our incomes are pooled to pay for bills, groceries, and overall family expenses. But we each have a certain amount of money that is ours to spend on whatever we want, without explaining or asking permission.

If you can't (or don't want to) get credit cards, you can do the same thing with individual accounts. Just get a joint account and two individual accounts, one for each of you. Have your bank automatically transfer a certain amount of money from the joint account into each individual account every month.

I think this is the best solution. A marriage should be a partnership, so I think it makes sense to have a joint account. But you should each be able to have something that is just yours.

3
temp9876•

I think that is one great solution. My husband and I maintain completely joint finances but we discuss all purchases, not for permission but to stay aware of where we're at. We have an understanding of how much we can spend on whatever and it has never been necessary to separate the accounts. I think it is helpful for us because we have to discuss finances constantly so it is really a joint effort to keep the books balanced.

2
Neo991lb•

I might suggest this to my wife. I think if we had a date fund and a little bit of money each of us could spend on ourselves each month, it would make things a lot easier than "pay the bills and don't spend money without telling me or I'll make you feel guilty later".

1
Deviant1•

True. The other interesting thing I've noticed is that the BF will often spend his 'disposable' income on things for the house or things for us, not just for things for him. After observation and discussion, I've decided that it fulfills his "need to provide" urge.

1
hellobrooklyn•

Only partially relevant, but, I had a roommate who was an only child and had difficulty with the whole yours/mine/ours thing. Basically anything of his was known as "my", like "Where's my lear jet?". Anything of anyone else's in the house was "our" or "the", for example "What happened to the brontosaur burgers?". Funny how some people have serious issues with those things.

16
[deleted]•

[deleted]

1
Deviant1•

Odd that you mention this. I am actually an only child, my BF is the youngest of four. He tends to phrase things much more as "my", "your" and not "our". I've referred to the house as "our" house since even before we came to this arrangement. He's become better about it, but it wasn't his natural inclination.

Our roommate is also an only child, and is also better about sharing. Go figure!

1
phuzion•

Where's my lear jet?

One would hope safely tucked away in an airplane hangar.

1
elrizzy•

hope and pray you never break up. one of my biggest regrets was supporting someone this way. the resentment you will feel will be enormous if you ever part ways.

furthermore, the way of life you have is not long-term sustainable, for there will always be a "worth" issue lingering over both your contributions to the relationship.

7
lynn•

If you part ways, you'll be resentful, so the way of life you have is not sustainable?

I'm having trouble understanding how this is supposed to make sense.

6
elrizzy•

i was unclear. edited.

2
[deleted]•

Yes, because no one has ever had one partner stay at home long term....

3
elrizzy•

there's a difference between "staying at home long term" and "staying at home long term and adding value to the relationship by doing a full time job such as raising kids"

lets be realistic here. there is a serious relationship inequality afoot. hypothetically -- if the boyfriend dies the house becomes messy and the girlfriend eats out a bit more. if the girlfriend dies the boyfriend starves to death and the loses the house/apartment.

1
[deleted]•

I agree. about to get divorced and that resentment is front-and-center.

2
HalfandHalf•

You would've found something else to find resent in even if your partner had been holding down a job. That's just my opinion.

1
HalfandHalf•

Can I ask why you broke up?

2
elrizzy•

it was an amicable break up, we decided that the love we once had was no longer an intense romantic love we once had and now just a "i like this person" friendship love. we still talk and while i hated the situation, i have no ill feelings towards her.

i think a lot of the transition was helped by the fact i ended up feeling like a fatherly protector -- while my partner felt a little bit helpless and unimportant. we tried many things to get around that but ultimately its hard to do even normal things like decide on dinner or argue over the remote if one party feels like it constantly "owes" the other something, even subconsciously.

1
Deviant1•

I am very lucky to make almost 3x my boyfriend's former salary. Not sure how two people with no children living on ~$150k/year is not sustainable in your view.

In fact, I would go so far as to say that one's lifestyle can be unsustainable at any salary level if you don't control the urge to acquire.

I hope that we don't break up, but realize it won't be the end of the world if we do. I feel, day to day, that I'm getting a good deal from him staying home, and he feels the same. I don't understand how one would not have resentment of an arrangement during the relationship, but suddenly would following the end of the relationship. It seems to me either you would have resentment during the relationship, you'd just be repressing it, or you'd be constructing reasons for resentment after the fact.

Just because it doesn't compute for me, though, doesn't mean it didn't happen for you, I suppose. I'm willing to acknowledge that everyone is different...

1
elrizzy•

i wish you luck and i hope you don't break up. i didn't mean to come across as "doom and gloomy".

the money is not the issue here, it's just the inequality in contribution levels for the respective partners is out of whack. sure, you love him and he loves you -- this helps you hurdle many issues and its a wonderful thing. but i guarantee that one day, you will have a fight or misunderstanding and one of you will feel either inadequate or like a babysitter and resentment will grow.

i guess as long as you can deal with that then you will be successful.

2
lurchysmokins•

u sound like my ex...

0
telebision•

sounds good my gf offered me this recently since she is finishing up her phd. When I was working I hated my job and I was always in a shitty mood, since I stopped working a couple months ago its been a lot better.

She did say she would put half the money she has left over after paying all the bills in a private bank account for me. It is really going against everything I've been raised to believe in but this way I can concentrate on school and other things. She also said she'd pay for a cleaning lady as I'm pretty shitty at housework so it probably won't affect our sex life too much.

7
[deleted]•

uhhhh so your girlfriend is going to let you live for free on her dime and she'll even pay someone to clean?

what exactly are you going to be doing all day? if you do nothing you're going to get bored and cranky and feel useless and spend all day drinking or self-loathing or something

and it'll hurt the relationship eventually as she won't feel like you're pulling your weight

make sure you have something to keep you busy... and don't hire a maid, man up, cleaning is easy if you have half a brain.

9
telebision•

if I stay at home cleaning all day it will completely emasculate me...

I may as well wear an apron when I greet her when she comes home

as someone else pointed out, girls still like their men to be men they might say it doesn't matter but it does and after a while they will get turned off

1
Deviant1•

As long as it's an arrangement that is truly agreeable to both of you, then it's a good arrangement. I've found that it takes more communication than just going with the 'status quo', but, for me, that makes it beneficial to the relationship.

3
rtb•

A friend of mine (well, an e-friend, I've never met him in person) was a househusband for a couple of years, and he said he always wanted somebody to ask why he stays home, so he could say (in a small voice) "We don't believe a man should work outside the home." But he got a job before he ever got to use it.

You should suggest that to your boyfriend. I'm sure you can get lots of humor value out of it.

3
Deviant1•

That is AWESOME! Thank you.

2
SirPlus•

He sounds like a swell fellow. Even though my kids are all grown up, I still manage the house for myself and my working gf. I wash all the clothes, do 70% of the shopping, clean the house while she's out. She loves it and so, apparently, do all her admiring girlfriends.

7
Drazi421•

You've just described my life.

1
scottcmu•

Does he surprise you in the kitchen wearing lingerie after you've had a hard day at the office?

1
JustAGirl81•

I think that may traumatize my son- lol! But he does have a nice cup of tea ready for me. . .

1
Kavok•

Do you ever tell him to get his ass in the kitchen and make you a sandwhich?

1
JustAGirl81•

Lol- he'd probably just laugh. Then he'd go make me a sandwich.

2
[deleted]•

How does your husband retain his sense of dignity considering he's willingly castrated his own manhood?

-4
JustAGirl81•

Really? I happen to think a man raising his son and supporting his family in other ways besides financial is just as "manly" as being an office monkey. Does that mean because I work as an office monkey and support my family financially I'm going to grow a dick? Way to have an open mind. Sometime come visit the rest of us in the year 2010.

5
[deleted]•

lol Just b/c it's 2010 doesn't mean the human animal can just turns it's back on millions of years of evolutionary gender roles. Why don't you do a pole of how many women honestly find men who work as "house husbands" attractive? Or pole your husbands friends (if he still has any) of how many secretly think what he's doing is pretty faggy? Or why don't you pole a bunch of high priced female power lawyers of how many have husbands, or how many that complain they can't find a man? lol Get real honey.

-5
JustAGirl81•

Are you married? Do you have kids?

2
Deviant1•

Suggest you learn the different between "pole" and "poll"... it will be helpful for future unjustified condescension.

My BF worked in a very "manly" field (auto racing). His friends are openly jealous of him.

I work in engineering. I manage a department and make nearly $150K/yr. My female counterpart in this office is incredibly jealous.

Because I don't have to worry about taking care of dinner, cleaning the house, and taking care of the dogs, I get more sleep, and, therefore, we have more time for mid-week sexy time.

2
[deleted]•

My wife and I discussed it and, although I like the fantasy of staying home cleaning, working out, and generally being a better husband... I know that my PS3 would call to me, World of Warcraft still exists, and... oh God, the porn...

107
nerdflu•

I'd be in and out (heh) of that phase too. After a couple of weeks/months it would get a bit old to just sit around and game/porn while seeing the house go to hell. I'd find many projects around the house/yard to accomplish.

9
derpderderp•

like growing shrooms and weed all over the backyard

44
boymangodshit•

I wish my girlfriend would support me in these hobbies... I promise to keep the house clean and make dinner too...

9
lynn•

And think of how much tastier dinner will be after smoking some of that weed!

1
thingamagizmo•

That's really not that different from the stuff that a lot of stay at home wifes do. Shopping, online bingo, girl's meet ups. I don't think there's anything wrong with you taking time for yourself, as long as you get the stuff you need to done.

5
[deleted]•

That reminds me of a contradiction I regularly experience in my home. Wife watches TV shows a lot. Not an unreasonable amount but it is clearly her primary hobby. In my case, I play video games. At most, for an hour a night. If she wants to talk to me while I'm playing a game and I don't immediately pause/stop playing and talk to her until she is satisfied I get all sorts of comments eluding to my laziness and my inability to "concentrate on her" when I'm playing a game. Two points, there is huge difference between a interrupting an easily pause-able TV show and interrupting a multi-player, real-time game (Call of Duty). She can go back to her show anytime... I usually die more than once while she's talking. Second point, I only play for an hour or so a day but each of her shows are around 45 minutes (of which she watches 3 or 4). - End rant

16
thingamagizmo•

At most, for an hour a night

You call that a hobby? I'm surprised you can even feel satisfied with less than an hour.

That said, I know what you mean. Non-gamers usually can't see the hypocrisy.

6
[deleted]•

[deleted]

1
[deleted]•

I hear you brother. Thats why I can't really ever play L4D. The campaigns are too long.

1
[deleted]•

[deleted]

1
PissinChicken•

+1 for honesty, it would be a fap fest

2
thephotoman•

Fapping gets old after a while.

3
PissinChicken•

In a universe that has time as a measure, everything gets old, it's all relative.

3
[deleted]•

[deleted]

1
[deleted]•

[deleted]

82
swordgeek•

Just about downvoted this, and then thought better of it.

If she's going to hate you for staying at home, she'll probably eventually hate you for something even if you go to work.

26
thepensivepoet•

My wife hates me all the time for things I didn't even do.

I just assume this is general female trait.

1
Musantem•

Hating you?

5
godbois•

It's a general human trait.

4
SashimiX•

No. It's your wife. I don't hate my husband.

And I don't assume he represents all males. But humans like to put things in boxes to better understand them.

1
swordgeek•

That's sort of comforting. It means I can't do anything about it.

1
[deleted]•

[deleted]

1
tetrawarp•

Either that or you will go stir crazy. If your kids & home are your work, then you never get time away from work.

2
cyancynic•

If you have kids, I recommend it. If you don't why bother? Keep working. I work from home as a programmer and send wife out to get job with benefits. So I get the kid to the school bus, help in the classroom, meet the bus in the afternoon, etc. I program half days - a four-five hour shift in the morning and another 2-3 hours after I put the kid to bed. Otherwise I'm daddy, get dinner, do house things in the afternoon. Lots of other guys I know around here do the same.

80
thedragon4453•

I hope this isn't a terribly offensive question, but how much do you make?

And the follow up, are you totally freelance?

11
cyancynic•

Freelance - yes.

I make freelance programmer's rates. I'm busy about 90% of the time. There are occasional late nights. But more often I have extra time and can take a play break or whatever.

10
Musantem•

I like the way this sounds. Can't say I wouldn't get lonely being at home alone for most of the day, though. I'd start to miss interacting with other adults.

5
liquidhot•

I also would like to know this.

3
StillAnAss•

I'm in the same boat. I'm at the point in my career where I don't have to bust my ass every minute to make enough to pay the bills. I make sure the kids get to school and if they miss the bus it isn't a big deal. I'm there when they get home, I take them to practice or they play with other kids and I know where they are.

Only real downside for me is as a freelancer I'm never really off the clock. Some nights I'm working until 2:00am. Other days I'm done by 4:00pm.

I'd have a very hard time going back to a "normal" office routine in a cubicle.

2
argily•

A friend and his son are both really into Go-Kart racing. So he parks his RV at the racetrack, works remotely all day, and spends downtime on the track. Bloody genius.

If I didn't hate programming so much, I would totally do this.

1
immerc•

That's really not the same thing.

The downside of being a "house husband" is the "not working" factor. Not bringing home any income, seeing as doing lesser work because you're only cleaning up after kids, doing laundry, making food, etc. If you're working from home earning a good living, all those factors disappear.

1
LouisCapet•

Hire a maid.

71
[deleted]•

I'm leaning towards this myself.

34
Stijn•

Just make sure it's a sexy one. mind wanders off

36
barfolomew•

Someone's been watching a little too much Spanglish...

11
brad3378•

and hire a 2nd maid that's ugly to do the actual cleaning while you watch the other maid.

1
rdewalt•

I have to agree on this, while not necessarily needing a daily maid, you can find plenty of cleaning services that will come by at any schedule you like (once a week, every two weeks, monthly...) and clean the house. My wife and I do the daily upkeep of our house, but having cleaners come in once a month -really- helps a lot.

As for the house-husband thing? Check with your office, see if you can take a month sabbatical. This way you can try it out, see if it works for you and your wife, before making a permanent plunge.

13
legoman666•

We have a cleaning lady come by every 2 weeks. She does the main living spaces and the bathrooms. It's only $75.

2
fancy_pantser•

A month or per visit? I have always wondered about the costs but all of their websites say they have to come by and do an inspection before they'll tell you about their services and prices.

1
TangentLogic•

Cheap way to teach your kids Spanish?

8
EvilGamerKitty•

I believe that's the idea behind an au pair. That sounds kickass if you can afford it.

3
bubbal•

An au pair is very inexpensive, as long as you have the room to house them.

1
squeedle•

My friend slept with his family's au pair....

1
CunningStunts•

This is one of the greatest decisions a husband and wife in your position could make. She'll cost about $10/hour and just have her once a week. $200/month and you and your wife will have so much more time to spend together doing fun things, your house will look better, fewer manhours will be spent on cleaning and you'll make someone's life $200/month better. I know a couple in their late twenties who told me it's one of the best and easiest decisions they made.

3
SirPlus•

Why? Its a waste of money and I bet you could do it better than any hired help. For me, it's a question of pride in my job, be it as an illustrator, a father or a house husband.

-3
mzieg•

It doesn't cost that much to hire a cleaning lady to come by and whisk through the house in 4hrs every two weeks. We had a lady from Ireland come by, and she had the funniest stories.

Beyond that, it's an important component of "trickle-down economics" to share some of your success with your community. It's great that his wife just doubled her salary, and that they can now pull down $120k. It's even better if they leverage their affluence to help others who are looking for work, and are willing to provide fair value for their wages. If the people at the top just horde their money, the whole economy suffers, hurting those at top and bottom alike.

At the end of the day, a dollar is like an electron: it don't do a damn bit of good sitting still (whether in your wallet or as part of conductive wire); but when it starts moving, hoping from place to place, that's when the magic really begins to flow. Keep your money moving!

19
thedragon4453•

Plus I fucking hate doing housework. As soon as it is within my means, I am hiring a maid. It is such a time suck, and I would rather spend time with my kids or play video games or something than fold laundry and clean my bathrooms.

2
SirPlus•

Dollars never sit still in my world.

1
[deleted]•

This is terrible advice. Your retirement fund is not a venture capital firm.

0
AnnArborBuck•

Why is hiring a maid a waste of money? You can get a pretty good maid for like $10 an hour. In 5 hours they will have your house clean from top to bottom. Most of us here facing this choice make way more then $10 an hour.

While I am the working husband my wife stays home with our kids. Our two little ones are special needs and we have to pay for some of their therapies out of pocket. We have actually found it cheaper to pay for a maid and have my wife do the therapy (we still go to the therapist weekly, but this way my kids get more therapy then we could normally afford).

8
kbedell•

You ever have a good housekeeper? A good one will keep your house much cleaner than you will -- and take less time doing it.

7
SirPlus•

They'd have to boil the furniture before they could do a better job of it than I do.

1
[deleted]•

Unless the maid costs more than $40,000/year, it's not a waste of money. It's more profitable to work and hire a maid, and it removes the "I work and you don't, you're a bad husband" aspect of things.

6
[deleted]•

It may be a waste of money to you but maybe it will free up their time to do other stuff, and also provide income/employment for the maid as well.

3
SirPlus•

Why would I pay someone to do something I can do better and quicker? That is not sound economics, mate.

0
[deleted]•

[deleted]

2
SirPlus•

I'm not much good at that kind of stuff. My DIY skillz are non-existent and I can barely put up a shelf (I let the wife do that).

1
sixmill•

I hire a maid to do a thorough cleaning of my house once every three weeks for ~80 USD. It's really worth it to only have to do simple day to day cleaning duties around the house.

1
colloquy•

I came here to say this. I'm a stay at home mom - retired military, but that's beside the point - If I were to go back to work, I would hire someone to do the household chores. There's no reason not to.

1
Tilt168•

retired or just ETS? cause retired and a stay at home mom...how old are your kids? either way good for you!

1
colloquy•

Yes - retired (though somewhat early thanks to the Clinton administration that offered "early outs") - I enjoy reading Reddit with my teenager. We share lots of laughs here and bond. :-)

1
sammythemc•

For some reason I read this as "hire a mermaid"

1
[deleted]•

I've been a house husband for about 20 years. Both the boys are in Berkeley now. Before I was a systems programmer in Cupertino.

I've written several mid-list books and now I (by accident) am making far more money than my Stanford-educated CPA wife through investing. (For example, Citigroup is up 7.72% as I write and so have made on paper about $20,000 today.)

We were poor for about a decade, but that was the time I spent reading the entire LoTR to the boys and watch their amazing development from birth until now. Great memories about teaching them logical conundrums or creating our own fantasy scenarios about ambiguous heroes and assisting them in making value judgments about everything you can think of such as finding the incongruity in higher dimensional volumes of spheres or the epiphanies of Raymond Carver.

It's hard to argue with being able to read and write as much as I want in addition to knowing my children as well as any man can.

66
danceswithsmurfs•

Don't forget that you haven't made a dime until you sell those stocks. I know people who had to figure that out the hard way.

33
[deleted]•

Don't worry, the last couple of years I've made (and booked) about 25% per year. I would have made even more if I had bought-and-held the equities I was looking at, so this year I am trying not be such an active trader.

Besides, investing is merely the soulless activity (albeit fun, as in suicide ganking a noob in Eve) I do so I can spend time doing other things I like, such as finding music for the boys or making sure I keep up my academic skills so I can give suggestions for their undergraduate classes in literature, physics, math, and of course computer science.

Other than the social discontinuity of gender-reversing the expected nurturing roles, being a house-husband is great. Yeah, the moms looked at me like a molester at the playground, and other men felt embarrassed that I've changed more diapers than my spouse. but this is the life. Go to the gym when I want, do some creative cooking when I want, plan vacations to exotic lands, and am always available on gmail chat to my boys, when they need to talk to me, usually on a daily basis. Hearing about their gaming, their professors, their hookups and dangerous drug behavior (?!?) keeps me young at heart too. I was far more of an idiot than they are when I went to college.

Finally, I supported my wife through her masters and CPA and her periods of un- and under-employment, so I feel good about helping her reach the professional goals that she would like to achieve in her life.

(I overcame the resentful-spouse-working-outside-the-home by accomplishing enough that I actually have achieved some fame (publications, wikipedia entry, etc) in my tiny intellectual niche; it also helps to actually bring in a higher income--but I admit that was pretty much luck, as I just sort of fell into investing after receiving a modest bequest. But this is the golden age of self-directed investing. You don't have to go to the big city to view the ticker-tape denominated in 32nds of a cent anymore, and ACH makes funds transfer a breeze.)

13
Imsomniland•

As a young man in a relationship that may (or may not) go somewhere, you inspire me to be a good future husband. Thanks for sharing.

2
[deleted]•

ESPECIALLY with bank stocks.

1
whatthedude•

Yeah, I'm sure a grown man that's been investing for years doesn't know that. Side note, you do realize you're the idiot by writing that comment don't you?

-1
danceswithsmurfs•

My comment is not just for investorC but for anyone reading his comment and thinking about doing the same thing. Not everyone has the same level of experience. It's actually very tough to force yourself to sell a stock that's shooting up. Most people can't do it. And, no, I don't feel like an idiot at all, thank you very much. My advice was intended to be helpful and I stand by it.

1
[deleted]•

[deleted]

1
whatthedude•

I really hope I can take your money some day.

-1
[deleted]•

how do you buy stock? do you use etrade or some such service? i've always been somewhat curious about this.

2
[deleted]•

I use both Vanguard and SogoTrade. Vanguard for my retirement account or large bets that I am not moving around very frequently (as their commissions are pretty high at $20 a trade for any stock up to a thousand shares).

SogoTrade is only $3 a trade for unlimited number of shares so it is ideal when you want a little high-frequency day trading to liven up the experience. I have heard very good things about Ameritrade, Fidelity, and other brokers. SogoTrade is definitely a bare-bones operation, so don't expect much support or ancillary financial services.

Using an on-line broker is easier than buying or selling on eBay. I use Google finance for real-time quotes; Level2StockQuotes to view real-time support and resistance asks and bids.

When I make a bunch of money in my brokerage account, I push a few buttons and it is transferred to my checking account. You literally can do this anywhere in the world. My last vacation to Australia I traded with my netbook at cafes in Sydney, and spent the money on dinner with my US-based debit card a few days later. That's the life.

Edit: I have a computer science background so I am aware of the importance of proper encryption of the session and the encryption in place of my netbook (I use TrueCrypt 6.3a full-disk encryption, BTW; so when the netbook is stolen, the thief gets the physical device, but not my account information or credentials.)

1
[deleted]•

could you recommend any resources? books, sites, blogs, what have you.

1
laverabe•

You made $20,000 in one day?

2
[deleted]•

And I've lost almost that much, too.

It is not a typical day. I am quite happy to make 1-2% of my capital at risk every week or two.

Overall, I've been very fortunate and have generated a full professional-type salary from my trading for the last 2 1/4 years. Once you can master (not extinguish, but master) the feelings of fear of losing money with the exuberance of greed, I think you have the best chance to beat other investors.

1
laverabe•

Personally, I buy and hold, as in to save for retirement. I typically buy an index ETF (SPY/SDY) or other general fund. Low P/E when I buy, and then I just let it sit forever, that way both you, and the company, help each other, instead of trying to screw the company for short term profits. Occasionally I'll buy individual stocks, like MMM, since it had solid financials and a bottomed out P/E. I bought MMM when it was at 50, now it's around 80. Some of my other buys didn't turn out as well, but typically I stick to index funds over the long term. Either way, it's all unrealized gain/losses, as it's a long-term approach.

I'm not really a good investor though. I would have been better off putting everything in CDs 10 years ago. I'm about broke even with what I was 5 years ago, since i stuck out the crash.

What exactly is your trading strategy, buying undervalued stocks and sell when they're overvalued? I don't day trade myself, ie short term buying and selling to make a profit; it's little different than gambling at a casino, except the losers are often working class people saving for retirement, since they're not as financially savvy.

1
[deleted]•

Well, buy and hold has traditionally been the most conservative and wisest investing strategy. 2008-2009, not to mention the tech crash of half-a-decade earlier trashed even that strategy. Unfortunately, articulating any strategy is self-defeating because of the self-referential nature of the zero-sum game of stock trading: once a majority of people use your winning strategy, it stops winning.

I have successfully used the contrarian "buy when there is blood in the streets" strategy and conversely to sell when everyone is buying, such as articulated by Warren Buffet. It doesn't hurt to be able to read a balance sheet and to try to figure out what is being hidden from you by the management. I am in C right now because I feel that it is fundamentally undervalued.

Stay away from anything that requires a knowledge of the Black-Scholes equation :-), alternatively, learn what a black swan event is. :-) :-) Don't borrow money to trade stocks.

1
[deleted]•

Gotta have money to make money.

1
2manybitches•

I bought at 3.18. When did you get in?

1
[deleted]•

You did better than me. I've averaged down to 3.31, but I am trying to get out of the market timing / day-trading mindset and go for some longer term capital gains. Day trading, currency trading, and option writing are more addictive than staying at the top of the leaderboard in Left 4 Dead 2. :-)

2
2manybitches•

Fair enough, I am reading everything I can get my hands on at the moment; it certainly is addictive and I agree that longer term investments are the way to go. Everything I read says not to worry about short term fluctuations, which is exactly what I'm getting so excited about!

1
[deleted]•

Keep working until you spawn Eddielings. That money in the bank will go a long way.

37
[deleted]•

I'll be dead before that happens; I had a vasectomy as soon as I was 18 and could find a competent urologist. I carry recessive genes for several nasty genetic defects and don't want to pass them along.

69
[deleted]•

Why not just suck it up, work for three years, save $100K then quit working? Pay off your mortgage dude.

31
[deleted]•

Pay off your mortgage dude.

Don't have one. And, believe it or not, I have a bit more than a hundred grand saved up for retirement -- or if I end up crippled. When I was younger, I disregarded women and acquired currency.

75
[deleted]•

Nice... I guess it just becomes a question of what you want to do. My thoughts: being unemployed blows donkey balls. With only two people and no kids, there simply isn't that much housework to be done. Do you love you job? If so, stay in it. If not, now is the perfect time to explore something different... start a business, launch yourself into full-time nonprofit efforts, whatever floats your boat. I would advise against sitting around the house all day. I get serious cabin fever. You need to find an outlet for productivity, creative or otherwise.

30
Tom-nomnom•

Upvoted for following the advice of gods.

7
thephotoman•

Wow, you really covered your bases.

Knock yourself out and have an awesome life, man.

3
[deleted]•

How old are you? You seem to be in your mid-forties.

2
jotabe•

If you do have the money saved up, I'd stay home and work really part time. Like 1/4 of the time, and help with the house with the rest of the time.

Saving all of your current income is great, but if you've taken care of the money problem already, I'd improve my life in other ways. But that's just me.

2
djangonaut•

When I was younger, I disregarded women and acquired currency.

You are my fucking hero. I'm in that "younger and disregarding women, while acquiring currency" stage right now. Sometimes I have doubts, but I haven't gone to a club or sought out a girlfriend in a long long time now.

Any regrets?

I think I'm on the right path, personally.

2
[deleted]•

Do you have currency, or do you have a ephemeral number in a computer somewhere. If you don't own free hold dirt in a very desirable location you don't have much. You should be thinking waterfront or view lot in the most desirable neighbourhood. Your wealth needs to track with inflation or your hard earned currency leaks away.

1
rgraham888•

Paying off your mortgage is a bad value proposition. When you take the tax deduction for paying the interest, you're paying about 3-4% on the mortgage. Putting the money into a stock/mutual find that pays decent dividends will generally put you farther ahead.

1
thingamagizmo•

If that's the case, you should consider adopting or foster parenting. Just from your actions already, I'd say you're pretty responsible, and there are a ton of kids out there who need the help.

3
[deleted]•

Just from your actions already, I'd say you're pretty responsible, and there are a ton of kids out there who need the help.

Believe when I say that I'm not the guy these kids need.

9
laverabe•

if only there were more like you..

3
thephotoman•

Are you still open to adopting?

2
cobolNoFun•

+1 i like where your head is at. Adopt kids and make them take care of the house.

2
[deleted]•

I do not think I would be a good father.

1
munificent•

There's always adopting. I agree with most posters here, if you can work, work. You never know what expensive surprise may come up. If I were in your shoes I'd:

  1. Keep my job.
  2. Hire a maid.
  3. Save up lots of money, travel tons, and do lots of awesome stuff.
2
FANGO•

You can adopt. According to people who adopt, I've heard, it's pretty much the same thing.

2
[deleted]•

should have just cloned yourself.

2
[deleted]•

This world barely survived the existence of one of me.

1
imnormal•

Did you freeze any seed? I'd have a hard time getting that one done at 18.

1
[deleted]•

Are you serious? How do you know you are not a carrier of some super-duper-freakin-kickass-awesome gene? The future of mankind may depend on you procreating. Get that shit undone right now ...

-1
ManIs5•

It's not the masturbation that kills your day. It's the naps you take afterward that are the real time suck.

25
[deleted]•

(chuckle)

2
warabo•

Two And A Half Men finally makes sense!

1
SirPlus•

I wholeheartedly support you should you take this step.

When my wife wanted to go back to work when our youngest was a year old, I took over the reins of the household as I worked from home anyway. I worked out the household stuff like a military tactician, so much so that I was able to have the rest of the day free after finishing all the chores around noon. I'd take the boy for a spin and then return home to get four or five hours of work done before the other kids came home. Then, I'd give 'em a snack and do their homework with them until their mum came home to a meal which I cooked while the kids were watching TV or doing their work. Also, it helps being an insomniac as I was working online in another time-zone which meant I could get in another four to five hours work between 10pm-2/3am.

I always get annoyed when I would hear women complain that looking after one child left them with no time for themselves. Bollocks! With a little time management, its possible to retain your financial independence, spend time with your kids and look after the home.

I think it is intolerably retro to view women as being the best at this sort of job. I've seen innumerable men excel at domestic duties.

21
thingamagizmo•

Plus, when do you get time on your own at work? Maybe you're physically alone, but it's not like you're free to lounge back and watch your favorite show on tv.

2
tuffstuff•

My husband is a house-husband. I love that he is home. He's a really awesome cook and he takes such good care of me. He is an illustrator and a writer. But he's been having a hard time finding work and has run out of money. So I'm paying the mortgage alone and we're scraping by. I don't resent him at all though. It would be nice to not be scraping by, but I know things will turn around and he'll have an income again. He works hard—always following up with editors, publishers, etc. He's doing everything he can to find work. If he wasn't working hard, I would probably feel resentful. He feels terrible and worthless and probably somewhat emasculated sometimes, but I don't want him to give up what he's working toward, and take some shit job that he doesn't really like. He's mostly very happy, and likes being his own boss.

But your situation is different. I think if I were in your shoes I'd try to sock away as much money as possible. Do you own a home? Because if you do, you could pay off a big chunk of the principle on your loan, build equity and lower your mortgage payments. I'd probably do that first, plus save a bunch of money as a nice cushion, then stay at home and write.

EDIT: Another thing to consider is that staying home all day alone can be difficult - even if you keep yourself busy. When people don't respond to your emails as quickly as you'd like or return your phone calls, you start to feel invisible. Also you rarely have any human interaction. You can go days without seeing anyone but your wife. This may seem great to you at first, but I know it's tough on my husband. We need to connect with people in person— whether it's a smile, a wave, or some stupid small talk. We totally take this for granted when we work in an office. When we don't have this interaction, we miss it.

21
mostapha•

Have an upvote for being an awesome wife.

5
volksman•

ditto

2
d0m0kun•

no shit. upvote.

2
[deleted]•

We don't own a house; we've been content to rent while owning properties that we rent out to others. We hope to make a profit off the rental properties as soon as the mortgages are paid off.

2
[deleted]•

I don't think I could do it. Call me sexist or whatever, but where I'm from, a man works. If his wife makes a ton of money, he still works. I couldn't let my wife support me. Take that extra money and hire a maid.

19
[deleted]•

I don't think I could do it. Call me sexist or whatever, but where I'm from, a man works. If his wife makes a ton of money, he still works.

That's the attitude with which I grew up as well. On the other hand, if I'm pulling my weight by taking care of everything so that she can focus on her job, I think I'd be supporting her as much as she supports me.

Still, I'm going to keep my job. The housework isn't so difficult that I can't do it on a Saturday morning, and I do most of the cooking anyway.

30
[deleted]•

I think you'd find yourself seriously depressed. I would anyway. I need something meaningful to occupy my time.

13
[deleted]•

I'm an unpublished writer, so it's not like I'd be sitting on my ass all day smoking crack and playing Donkey Kong.

30
[deleted]•

Fair enough. By the way.....pot is much better for you.

32
[deleted]•

[deleted]

5
Poezestrepe•

Wouldn't it be possible for you to combine both: work less hours (possibly in another job) so you keep your financial independence, and spend the rest of the time on your books and the house?

2
[deleted]•

You want to be a writer or You're actually a professional writer that hasn't been published yet?

2
oodja•

Don't quit your day job to become a writer. Right now literary agents are up to their armpits in query letters from the ranks of the newly-unemployed who always felt they had that novel/13-book vampire series in them. All this while the entire publishing industry is about to implode thanks to ebooks.

My advice as a fellow unpublished writer? Keep making money any way you can while making the time to write as you've clearly done thus far. Even if you do manage to get lucky, it may be a while (if ever) before you make any real money as a writer.

(If you haven't seen it already, Lynn Viehl, author of Twilight Fall, had a great blog post about the economic realities of being a professional writer.)

2
[deleted]•

An artist (writer is a fucking artist) who doesn't do drugs.. no wonder you are unpublished.

1
yugami•

it's not like I'd be sitting on my ass all day smoking crack and playing Donkey Kong

Isn't doing drugs and playing video games what 99% of the unpublished "writers" do?

1
fungah•

Crack? Crack? CRACK!!!!!!!!!!Crack? Crack? CRACK!!!!!!!!!!Crack? Crack? CRACK!!!!!!!!!!Crack? Crack? CRACK!!!!!!!!!!Crack? Crack? CRACK!!!!!!!!!!Crack? Crack? CRACK!!!!!!!!!!Crack? Crack? CRACK!!!!!!!!!!Crack? Crack? CRACK!!!!!!!!!!Crack? Crack? CRACK!!!!!!!!!!Crack? Crack? CRACK!!!!!!!!!!Crack? Crack? CRACK!!!!!!!!!!Crack? Crack? CRACK!!!!!!!!!!Crack? Crack? CRACK!!!!!!!!!!Crack? Crack? CRACK!!!!!!!!!!Crack? Crack? CRACK!!!!!!!!!!Crack? Crack? CRACK!!!!!!!!!!Crack? Crack? CRACK!!!!!!!!!!Crack? Crack? CRACK!!!!!!!!!!

-9
[deleted]•

My fiance grew up with that attitude as well. He scoffed at the idea when I suggested maybe he can stay home and be a house husband. He's been home for 6 months because of the economy (left military and can't find a job, but knows I would rather he take his time than return to the military).

I know he's quickly getting bored. He spends time filling out job applications, grad school applications, and he tries to join clubs, but I'd like it if he can find something he likes so he doesn't feel he's trapped in the house.

He's slowly getting used to the idea that I earn more than him and I'll probably always earn more than him. At one point he seriously considered ending our relationship because I'm the higher income earner and that apparently makes him feel he's "less of a man".

I'm glad he's turned around and understand I expect him to support me the same way I support him now if I were to become unemployed. He's also learning I just suck at housework (lucky enough to grow up with maids). He's taken all the cooking at home and prepares my lunch, and we split cleaning duties. I really like the arrangement. Ideally I want to keep this arrangement when we have kids so someone's teaching the kids something valuable. I don't trust strangers to not rot my future children's brains.

1
Kalium•

With children, it becomes an economic question. You spend a lot of money on daycare and such. When this amount is greater than the amount brought in by one of the parent working, it no longer makes economic sense for both parents to work.

10
[deleted]•

If you are paying out your salary in daycare, it's time to move.

4
Kalium•

Or you don't make very much.

8
[deleted]•

Not very much at all.

1
nolcotin•

However, by staying in the "career track" you are much more employable when the kids are out of daycare

3
[deleted]•

That's an absolute fact!! Besides, why take a break, ruin your career, and be potentially broke later in life when you can just bit the bullet, stay working, be successful, and retire rich??

1
turkproof•

That's absurdly cold. What about the emotional benefits to experiencing the growth of your children, and the assurance they're happy, safe, and learning?

2
Kalium•

With children, many things are economic questions. It's not a warm and fuzzy way of looking at things, but it's a necessary one. What are the costs? What are the benefits? Do the benefits outweigh the costs?

It's not warm and fuzzy and cuddly and touchy-feely. It's also how important decisions get made.

2
cphat•

And yet that is why so many kids are screwed up these days. Parents don't want to parent.

1
sethro•

Are you from the past?

1
[deleted]•

Aren't we all?

3
sethro•

Woah. I see what you did there.

2
[deleted]•

Take that extra money and hire a maid.

It's not healthy for the kid. My mom stayed at home just because my dad got a Ph.d and she only (haahha only) had a Masters degree. My dads friend has a Ph.d. Her husband works, but they got a hobby farm so he can be productive, look after the kids and have them in a healthy outdoors environment.

1
Hwaaa•

Gotta agree with this. Also, would a woman truly respect a man that did what is genetically and culturally a feminine role? Downvote me if you like, but I don't think so.

-1
arcsine•

I'd definitely consider taking a job I'd really like doing instead of taking one that pays enough to support a fun life if that was already being taken care of... But I'd have to REALLY, REALLY KNOW that the relationship would last a lifetime. I'd basically be throwing my career away if I did so.

19
[deleted]•

But I'd have to REALLY, REALLY KNOW that the relationship would last a lifetime.

We've known each other for ten years and been married for five, and already faced unemployment together. I want to think that we'll grow old together, but there are no guarantees in life. Besides, she might not be able to hack it in her new position, as it carries a shitload of additional responsibility (hence the doubled salary). If she ends up losing the job, my still earning a salary of my own will make it easier.

21
arcsine•

Sounds like you really know what you're getting yourself in to here. Why not delay things for a year until the situation settles itself down? Once that's the case, even if you go to a "cushy job", you can still work your way back up the ladder if your situation ever changes.

15
[deleted]•

Sounds like you really know what you're getting yourself in to here.

I've never been one to rush into a decision. However, I had decided as I was writing the original submission that I'd keep my job. The extra forty grand before taxes will be useful, and earning my own salary gives me a necessary measure of independence that allows me to deal from a position of strength in the relationship.

11
arcsine•

At least let it take a load off your mind, it's nice to know that you don't have to claw your way along the career path, sacrificing your sanity in the process, to assure a good life for you and your wife.

5
juniper_spider•

Look into what your taxes will be like now that you've gained an extra 40k. My husband's tax bracket is such that it is financially detrimental for me to work. Depending on him is a little weird, but we work with it.

2
tdk2fe•

Here's the thing - work now, put away all the extra money, and enjoy retiring several years earlier.

3
falconandwhip•

Sounds like my dream come true.

18
grooviegurl•

Mine too. Wanna get hitched?

11
godbois•

A reddit wedding?

I'll get the flowers!

5
AlantheCowboyKiller•

Dearly Beloved Redditors,

We are gathered here today to celebrate the joining of falconandwhip and grooviegurl in holy matrimony.

This is a sacred right. An ancient right. As falconandwhip and grooviegurl prepare to join their lives, it is important to understand that everyone present here on Reddit has played a part in shaping their lives, especially you, EddieVanHelsing. And, we will continue to play a vital role in their continuing future. And thus, we are here not only to witness their vows to each other, but to bestow upon them our blessing, preferably done through gifts of upvotes, orangered envelopes, and bacon.

Such a relationship should not be entered into lightly, but reverently, and after much consideration, to make sure they will be not any fellow to claim to be a big brother taking care of little girls.

If it is your intention to take each other as internet husband and wife, please unite your comments and step forward.

2
volksman•

I would and am!!! My wife and I are testing this out. I still do freelance work here and there but my primary focus is taking care of our children and keeping the house in order. My wife loves it.

The only downside is the stigma that others place on me as a male: too lazy to work etc...but fsck'em. It works in our house and our kids (and our relationship) are better off for it.

I'm not going to lie, being a house dad is the best job I've ever had.

16
daveysan•

My dream is to work about 10-15 hours a week (at a library, it is one of the few career fields where this is possible) while being a stay at home Dad as well.

My current partner doesn't want kids. If we stay together, I figure I will just have a really sick garden and grow all our food :)

13
[deleted]•

[deleted]

6
Merit•

Have you seen rabbits up close? They are a little too cute to kill, unless you are really hungry.

2
[deleted]•

[deleted]

3
brad3378•

The nice thing about rabbits is they can be used as either pets or meat

2
Merit•

When it comes to meat, only eat Rabbit sparingly as part of a balanced diet.

2
godbois•

I can't possibly imagine raising animals for personal slaughter and consumption.

1
bxblox•

I can't imagine raising animals that I will not slaughter and consume.

2
[deleted]•

[deleted]

2
[deleted]•

I have a small but high density organic vegetable garden. Done right, you can get a shockingly high amount of food produced for very, very little investment. I have about 100 square feet of ground surface total, but more vertical since I lets stuff vine over fences. At peak I produce a laundry basket of vegetables every two to three days. It is winter here and I still eating stuff I stored away.

1
mistakeforanaxiom•

Curiousity - how do you store the vegetables without them going bad? Can/jar them, or something else? What vegetables do you grow? And what resources did you find most helpful when starting your garden and making it productive (assuming you didn't already have childhood/job/other experience)?

Sorry for the onslaught of questions, I just think the idea of a garden like that sounds awesome and would love to have one of my own once I get the chance.

1
[deleted]•

how do you store the vegetables without them going bad?

Freezer, or just shelve them. Root vegetables have a long shelve life, like onions, potatoes, etc.. if stored correctly. Squash can store for more then a year. I just sacrificed one I the other day that I picked in November. The rest I freeze, for instance carrots and tomatoes freeze well. We always make tomato sauce fresh from tomatoes we freeze, the skin slide off right away under hot water, and it tastes an order of magnitude better then anything in a jar. Some vegetables you have to blanch to freeze, I usually skip those, or don't freeze them for too long (enzymes break them down).

And what resources did you find most helpful when starting your garden and making it productive

Square Foot Gardening. It's a system created by an engineer for intensive organic gardening. I use the spacing it advises, plus make my own adjustments. Be aware, following his method to a 't' is overkill and will cost too much money. The book is for people who have never grown a thing, and has solutions for every single problem you may encounter.

Build a raised bed (four pieces of wood and some screws), easy access, less weeds, warms faster in spring. Use the existing dirt, get rid of the grass there is there is any, but be sure to bang all the dirt off. Use compost from the cities composting program, or if you live in some backwards place that doesn't do that, get cheap manure and peat moss and mix it in. Mix it in well, make sure the soil is good and broken up. be sure to add some cheap ass bone meal or dolomite lime to add calcium. Grow beans, carrots, peas, chard, zucchini, squash, broccoli, cucumber right from seed in the ground. Be sure to plant extra and thin out. DO NOT buy these already started, huge waste of money. Buy tomatoes, peppers, eggplants already started. Use lots of cheap bamboo (big ones) to build what things need to grow up. Plant tall to short so they don't block out light. Lettuces and spinach, grow in pots, or else too many bugs/rabbits. A few small pots/old buckets/whatever seeded densely will feed a family continuously with baby leafs. Learn what bolting is and how it relates to vegetables where you eat the leaves. Learn the difference between determinate and indeterminate tomatoes are, learn the correct way to prune and stake indeterminate tomatoes. Give vining plants like beans, squash, cucumbers, etc... space to grow out and away. Plant tall plants in the back, short in the front so they don't block out light. Mix in herbs and a few flowers (marigolds) to attract beneficial insects. Follow the square foot gardening spacing, not the spacing on the packet. That is it, that is 90% of vegetable gardening right there.

Here is a pic of my garden so you can see how I use vertical space and short plants in front. I have a wood structure, but all you need is tall bamboo: My Garden

Here is the spacing: Garden Spacing

Message me anytime with questions.

1
jcodec•

You have a rare and special opportunity to pursue your dreams instead of drudging away at a soulless IT job you are clearly indifferent about. If you squander this opportunity you may regret it later.

However, if you just jump in headfirst without making preparations first, you'll likely have to return to corporate America (I assume, since you quote numbers that look like they could be U.S. dollars) with your tail between your legs.

Here are the steps (in order) that illustrate how to make the jump from 'someone else's employee' to 'a man following his heart':

1. Know exactly how much money you're dealing with. Calculate what your monthly cost of living is (both recurring bills and estimated variable expenses). Calculate the difference between your cost of living and your combined take-home pay. This is your monthly disposable income. This number is magic.

For example, Bob and Sarah take home $6000/month after taxes (woohoo, new promotion!).
Bills and expenses are $3500. That leaves $2500 as monthly disposable income

2. Build a six-month buffer. Multiply your cost of living by six. Divide that by your monthly disposable income. That's the minimum number of months you should stay at your current job.

Bob and Sarah need to save $21,000 to have six months of expenses covered.
That will take Bob and Sarah 9 months to build, saving $2500 per month.

3. Eliminate outstanding debt. Being as debt-free as reasonably possible is one of the keys to making a successful jump out of corporate wage-slavery. I understand that certain types of debt like homeownership or six-figure student loans are not trivial matters. However, consider any debt in the five-figures (car notes) and certainly any debt in the four-figures or fewer (credit cards, personal lines of credit, other revolving debt) as high-value candidates for your total outstanding debt figure, to be zeroed. Add up all your total outstanding debt. Divide by your monthly disposable income. That's how many months you'll need to stay at your job to be (reasonably) debt-free.

Bob and Sarah have a car payment and some credit card debt - $14000 total.
It'll take 6 months to zero these debts.

Bob should stay at his job for another 15 months.

4. Submit your resignation. You're free to focus on your creative passion full-time. With a six-month expense buffer and much less debt overhead (which actually makes your six-month buffer even longer), you have the time to get started, put in 8 hours a day at the home office, and start getting paid.

Bob writes books from his home office, as well as typical "house husband" stuff.
Sarah still makes more money, but they're both much happier people.
13
[deleted]•

You have a rare and special opportunity to pursue your dreams instead of drudging away at a soulless IT job you are clearly indifferent about. If you squander this opportunity you may regret it later.

Thanks for the advice. My wife and I were talking about this over lunch, and we decided that we'd both keep working, kill off our debts, and save as much as we could. If I end up getting published and making it big, we'll retire together immediately. Otherwise, we figure we'll have enough to retire by the time we're both 45, barring catastrophic reversals of fortune.

2
jcodec•

There's a rudimentary debt elimination calculator available at Debt MD. There are obviously much more sophisticated software solutions for this, including ones that optimize exactly how much to pay each month to each creditor to minimize interest charges, but this one works well for debt management forecasting.

1
otherwiseyep•

I would be a househusband in a heartbeat if the situation were right.

12
deletevalue•

Same here, but only in the sense of not having a traditional job. In addition to the household tasks, I'd see what hobbies I could make some spare money off of (writing, programming, etc...).

1
vessenes•

The SIMS, think of the SIMS.

My wife and I used to play The SIMS together, and we quickly learned that a good family situation involved having someone home to take care of the house, keep up relationships with the neighborhood, etc.

We called this person "The Drudge," and usually had two workers and one drudge in the house.

After a while, we noticed something weird, though. The Drudge was always the happiest person in the house, less work stress, time to talk to people, some self-improvement time.. This became a running joke in our family. My wife no longer works outside the home, and when we feel like joking about it, we do refer to The Drudge from the SIMS.

I just asked her what she thinks about your situation -- she says 'I love my job and I wouldn't trade it for anything, but I don't know anything about being a man, sorry.'

So, there you go.

11
EnderMB•

I used to do this as well, have one person to work and allow one person to improve themselves to the point where if they were to step into a job they'd be promoted every day.

2